Re: [dspam-users] Re: Dspam Project still active?
Well why would we need to build own svn/cvs/git or what ever you call it when there is already places what offer all of this. Examples: sf.net, freshmeat.net, launchpad.net Alexander Prinsier wrote: Dov Zamir wrote: I say, let's just do it. Let SN do whatever they want to do. They can leave us or join us, who cares? I believe that everyone on this list wants to get DSPAM back where it was two years ago. So let's just do it. Let's not wait for the developers to show up on this list and say their ready to help. Developers typically do not read the user's list, they have their own list. They'll come along when they're needed.if we can get the project up again as a community project. DSPAM is just too good to let SN, or anyone else kill it!! I agree. In the past, several people showed up and said they were willing to setup basic services like subversion/git, a mailing list, bug tracking system, etc. Could those people come forward now? I think it's time. Personally I'm offering to install and maintain one of the above services, I have experience in this kind of system administration, just not the time to maintain _all_ those services. Alexander !DSPAM:1011,494e74a2150922088486582!
Re: [dspam-users] Re: Dspam Project still active?
Oh, hi Steve! It's nice to see some old community members still here :) First I would like to see new release what would just include all the community made patches to 3.8.0 version. Also rpm spec file for missing distros would be really great, it would make it more easy to get it to 3rd party repos or even something like EPEL. After that when people has stop moaning that there has not been update for years, web management would need to rewrite and add new features. Also config could be more flexible. I would also like to see all /var/dspam stuff put into database. That could be a start and should have more than enough job to do right? // JiiPee Steve wrote: Original-Nachricht Datum: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:55:47 +0200 Von: Jani Partanen jii...@sotapeli.fi An: Richard i...@richard5.net CC: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] Re: Dspam Project still active? Okey time has again gone forward and it looks like all fork talk is quiet again. So will it be again same thing that 1 year is quiet and then someone pop up here and yell that this project need a fork! It has happen already at least 3 times. Every time there is much talking and much promises from current project owner, but nothing is really done. So will we again wait another year and hope that maybe this time? I have been looking other directions also and bogofilter is something what I might take a closer look. Assuming we would make a fork. What would be the things you would like to see in DSPAM after the fork? What functionality, etc... I personally would support a fork as long as DSPAM stays totally free. The current code does have some parts which are hidden and you only get if you buy certain hardware. And currently the DSPAM code is free but SN can at any time turn the code into closed source. They can't revert the already published code to be closed source but they can transform any future releases to be closed source. Anyway... I am much interested to hear what functions and enhancements you would like to see build into DSPAM after a fork. // Steve Richard wrote: First it's good to see the discussion heating up again... As I promised in the earlier discussions I'm willing to do the testing on the Mac platform as I currently support some users on OSX and have got my own mailserver running on it. i've included DSpam into my documentation/instruction set for setting up a mailserver under mac osx (see http://diymacserver.com/docs/). So answering question on using/compiling/configuring DSpam on OSX would be my way of helping. Let's see where it takes us... Richard On 29 Oct 2008, at 8:42 PM, Kyle Johnson wrote: I would like to help out. --Applied On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Imposit.com - Webmaster webmas...@imposit.com wrote: So well do it Im still readin about mailman/phpbb linking, maybe weve to wait for a link but ill setup a forum and a dev mailman maillinglist this week So what I need I now MODERATORS and listmanagers :-) shure I can and will do also some work. But help is welcome so send your applications now :-) Von: owner-dspam-us...@lists.nuclearelephant.com [mailto:owner-dspam-us...@lists.nuclearelephant.com] Im Auftrag von Mick Johnson Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2008 20:17 An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Betreff: RE: AW: AW: AW: [dspam-users] Re: Dspam Project still active? Hey all, Forum's a good idea – we'd be more than happy to link to it from the main page. Cheers mick From: owner-dspam-us...@lists.nuclearelephant.com [mailto:owner-dspam-us...@lists.nuclearelephant.com] On Behalf Of Imposit.com - Webmaster Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:15 AM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: AW: AW: AW: AW: [dspam-users] Re: Dspam Project still active? As we can see no easy desicion :-) I will take a look about the linking thing I think a dual solution maybe suitable, but the maillingaccess must be much better documentated so new users (and you wont belive how many don't know how to subscribe) have it easier. But what we need then is the link from the homepage to the new list and forum. Without that it would be a nice feature for existing users but new get lost When we get this we can also make some posts to it newsplattforms like golem or so and tell them that the project is active and developers are needed. Maybe well get response and some more users :-) !DSPAM:1011,494e7694150926538838526!
Re: [dspam-users] Re: Dspam Project still active?
Okey time has again gone forward and it looks like all fork talk is quiet again. So will it be again same thing that 1 year is quiet and then someone pop up here and yell that this project need a fork! It has happen already at least 3 times. Every time there is much talking and much promises from current project owner, but nothing is really done. So will we again wait another year and hope that maybe this time? I have been looking other directions also and bogofilter is something what I might take a closer look. Richard wrote: First it's good to see the discussion heating up again... As I promised in the earlier discussions I'm willing to do the testing on the Mac platform as I currently support some users on OSX and have got my own mailserver running on it. i've included DSpam into my documentation/instruction set for setting up a mailserver under mac osx (see http://diymacserver.com/docs/). So answering question on using/compiling/configuring DSpam on OSX would be my way of helping. Let's see where it takes us... Richard On 29 Oct 2008, at 8:42 PM, Kyle Johnson wrote: I would like to help out. --Applied On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Imposit.com - Webmaster webmas...@imposit.com wrote: So well do it Im still readin about mailman/phpbb linking, maybe weve to wait for a link but ill setup a forum and a dev mailman maillinglist this week So what I need I now MODERATORS and listmanagers :-) shure I can and will do also some work. But help is welcome so send your applications now :-) Von: owner-dspam-us...@lists.nuclearelephant.com [mailto:owner-dspam-us...@lists.nuclearelephant.com] Im Auftrag von Mick Johnson Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2008 20:17 An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Betreff: RE: AW: AW: AW: [dspam-users] Re: Dspam Project still active? Hey all, Forum's a good idea – we'd be more than happy to link to it from the main page. Cheers mick From: owner-dspam-us...@lists.nuclearelephant.com [mailto:owner-dspam-us...@lists.nuclearelephant.com] On Behalf Of Imposit.com - Webmaster Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:15 AM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: AW: AW: AW: AW: [dspam-users] Re: Dspam Project still active? As we can see no easy desicion :-) I will take a look about the linking thing I think a dual solution maybe suitable, but the maillingaccess must be much better documentated so new users (and you wont belive how many don't know how to subscribe) have it easier. But what we need then is the link from the homepage to the new list and forum. Without that it would be a nice feature for existing users but new get lost When we get this we can also make some posts to it newsplattforms like golem or so and tell them that the project is active and developers are needed. Maybe well get response and some more users :-) !DSPAM:1011,494dcc56150929008872405!
RE: [dspam-users] web interface is getting slower and slower
Thats why this information should be placed to SQL! Not into text file. Anyone able to make patch for it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Dadgar Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 8:12 PM To: DSPAM Users Subject: Re: [dspam-users] web interface is getting slower and slower On May 20, 2008, at 9:58 AM, Yoon Kit Yong wrote: Hey Group, Now when I go to the cgi web interface it takes almost a minute before showing results. I've currently only got 905 messages in quarantine. It seems to just be getting slower and slower over time. Any ideas what I can do to speed things back up? Check the log file in the dspam directory. It tends to grow large, and when it does, the cgi sucks up alot of memory and time. I have a cron job which culls the file every week. I do the same. The downside to this is that it also crops the history graphs and stuff. - Mark - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Check out my JustRacing homepage at: http://www.justracing.com/homepage/mdadgar !DSPAM:1011,4835e237150925509817984!
RE: [dspam-users] Dspam Fork?
You might wanna read all that history back what was talked before. Development was quite dead when this thread started. At least it woke up some people last time and made cvs possible. But cvs is nothing without STABLE releases time to time. And nobody won't accept more that a year release cycles when there is lot of known bugs and also some new features added into cvs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ZyanKLee Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 2:25 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: Re: [dspam-users] Dspam Fork? Anyway - I don't understand the need for a fork. Even if the projects developers can not put enough work into dspam there is no need for a fork. Talk to the developers and help them. Try to get involved with the development of the main project instead of dividing the work forces with a fork. So said - have a nice weekend! Zyan K Lee Jani Partanen schrieb: It's been half year now when this was rised. Now what has happen? Latest Stable Release [ v3.8.0-STABLE ]March 19, 2007 So nothing. And how many patches ubuntu/debian/gentoo/rh/suse/[insert your distro here] has already made for that stable latest release? I think if development was really happening, there would have been new release out already. I will again vote for fork! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:36 AM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: [dspam-users] Dspam Fork? Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:16:47 +0200 Von: Jani Partanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: \'Paul Cockings\' [EMAIL PROTECTED], dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Betreff: RE: [dspam-users] Dspam Fork? Well if I remember right, Jonathan has said his opinion already. It's GNU licensed, so anyone is free to use dspam as base for new project, just follow the instructions of license. /* DSPAM COPYRIGHT (C) 2002-2006 JONATHAN A. ZDZIARSKI This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */ gentoo community has made alot patches for dspam and what I have read gentoo forum, there is some people who does know dspam inside out, lol. I think you are referring to me. On the Gentoo forum I am known as SteveB. I am the one who created the DSPAM Gentoo ebuild as it is known and used today. Just last week I submitted around 11 or 12 patches to the Gentoo Bugzilla. so it would be very good for project if some of them would join if there will be a new project based dspam. Be sure that everyone using DSPAM and capable of coding or doing other thins for DSPAM and some spare time will work on and for a forked DSPAM. Gentoo as community based Linux distro will sure be on board. I don't mean just me. All of the Gentoo users and maintainers. I don't know debian community well but I think they have done some tweaking too. Not to forget all 20 or something like that patches what is posted on devs list. Gentoo has currently 27 patches for DSPAM 3.8.0. -Original Message- From: Paul Cockings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 10:19 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [dspam-users] Dspam Fork? My preference would be if the dspam community as a whole could move to a new project, but I'm not sure if anyone will come! A new project would need to maintain the bulk of the knowledgeable people found here, a return of Jonathan in some way if he is able, and a structured way that we can all commit back those patches without turning dspam into a black hole of focused smaller projects, that in time will become unmaintained. I see a need for a fork, but have no experience of a project lead in this way - the setup on sf.net is the easy bit, but will anyone else be interested if I did it? Paul Jani Partanen wrote: Maybe it would be better to start new project into sf.net for example? There is everything ready what is needed. Just a new name and adopt latest dspam code.. Thats what has happen
RE: [dspam-users] Dspam Fork?
It's been half year now when this was rised. Now what has happen? Latest Stable Release [ v3.8.0-STABLE ]March 19, 2007 So nothing. And how many patches ubuntu/debian/gentoo/rh/suse/[insert your distro here] has already made for that stable latest release? I think if development was really happening, there would have been new release out already. I will again vote for fork! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:36 AM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: [dspam-users] Dspam Fork? Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:16:47 +0200 Von: Jani Partanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: \'Paul Cockings\' [EMAIL PROTECTED], dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Betreff: RE: [dspam-users] Dspam Fork? Well if I remember right, Jonathan has said his opinion already. It's GNU licensed, so anyone is free to use dspam as base for new project, just follow the instructions of license. /* DSPAM COPYRIGHT (C) 2002-2006 JONATHAN A. ZDZIARSKI This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */ gentoo community has made alot patches for dspam and what I have read gentoo forum, there is some people who does know dspam inside out, lol. I think you are referring to me. On the Gentoo forum I am known as SteveB. I am the one who created the DSPAM Gentoo ebuild as it is known and used today. Just last week I submitted around 11 or 12 patches to the Gentoo Bugzilla. so it would be very good for project if some of them would join if there will be a new project based dspam. Be sure that everyone using DSPAM and capable of coding or doing other thins for DSPAM and some spare time will work on and for a forked DSPAM. Gentoo as community based Linux distro will sure be on board. I don't mean just me. All of the Gentoo users and maintainers. I don't know debian community well but I think they have done some tweaking too. Not to forget all 20 or something like that patches what is posted on devs list. Gentoo has currently 27 patches for DSPAM 3.8.0. -Original Message- From: Paul Cockings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 10:19 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [dspam-users] Dspam Fork? My preference would be if the dspam community as a whole could move to a new project, but I'm not sure if anyone will come! A new project would need to maintain the bulk of the knowledgeable people found here, a return of Jonathan in some way if he is able, and a structured way that we can all commit back those patches without turning dspam into a black hole of focused smaller projects, that in time will become unmaintained. I see a need for a fork, but have no experience of a project lead in this way - the setup on sf.net is the easy bit, but will anyone else be interested if I did it? Paul Jani Partanen wrote: Maybe it would be better to start new project into sf.net for example? There is everything ready what is needed. Just a new name and adopt latest dspam code.. Thats what has happen with amavis and many other projects before. Amavis actually have seen 2 different project, amavisd-new and maia mailguard. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cockings Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 9:49 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: [dspam-users] Dspam Fork? What happened to the ideas of a Dspam fork? Did anyone every get a response from Sensory Networks? (if you monitor the list please respond!) Does anyone have any thoughts on how the project can move forward when there is such a diverse user base, many different patches for many different set-ups, and several web guis etc - I can't fit the size of all that into my brain. I think at least two people offered trac/svn/webspace - did anyone come forward as admin? Any takers? Paul
RE: [dspam-users] dspam learning
I use amavisd-new and dspam. Basicly my setup is like this: postfix - amavisd - dspam - postfix - dbmail I have personaly disabled spamassassing checks from my account, so amavisd makes only clam scan. But all other users run both checks, spamassassin and dspam. Mainly because they are too lazy to teach dspam and I'm too lazy to setup shared group for dspam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robbie Garrett Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:59 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: [dspam-users] dspam learning Hey all, How many of you use spamassan and dspam together? if so.. can you please tell me about your setup?
RE: [dspam-users] Setup recommendations
You can configure postfix to listen example 127.0.0.1:25 where it won't do anymore any content checking, where you feed message from dspam. Then you have example 192.168.0.1:25 what will do content filtering and sends mail to dspam for scanning. so: postfix - dspam - postfix - cyrus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Brunson Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 1:43 AM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: [dspam-users] Setup recommendations I'm currently using spamassassin to tag my spam, but I've been talking about switching to dspam for a long time and finally have a server to set it up on for testing. My existing set up is like this: postfix --(via content-filter)- spamd --(via sendmail wrapper)- postfix --(via lmtp)- cyrus-imapd What I'd like to move to would be: postfix --(via lmtp)- dspam --(via lmtp)- cyrus-imapd and later add clamav through dspam's built in support. First of all, is that a reasonable architecture? Or would it be better to use dspam as a content filter within postfix? I'm currently using the sendmail wrapper to resubmit because it submits via a mechanism that skips the content filter associated with the port 25 listener. If I did use a content-filter, can I get around having to resubmit via the wrapper? Second, I've compiled dspam to run as a dspam user and created a normal user account to run in it's own homedir. Is that going to lead to any problems down the line? Third, not knowing too, too much about lmtp, does dspam have to have access to my users and domains (postfix virtuals) to deliver via lmtp? It's important because all that is stored in a mysql database that postfix and cyrus-imapd access directly. I didn't think it did, but I just wanted to cover all my bases. Finally, I have a corpus of spam filtered by spamassassin of about 600 email and a corpus of known good email (my inbox that I've hand deleted any false negatives out of) of about 2000 messges. Is this a decent foundation for training? Thanks for your time. Sincerely, e.
RE: [dspam-users] RPM?
Tony. I think we all here on the list are for two simple reasons here: We either need or we want to give help. I am here because of the later. So if you have a segmentation fault then I declare your problem as my problem and try to fix it. Help me to get to the point where I can help. What do I need to do to replicate your problem in my environment? I can take a CentOS 5.1 system and play around with DSPAM. But you need to feed me with information so I can quickly nail the problem or draw a circle around the areas where the problem could be. Without that I am lost and can not help the way I would like. Well he does have too big ego to ask help ;) I think the first thing to do is to build a RPM having a Red Hat layout. If we get that, then we could start to work from that point. What do you think? Can you share your .spec file to me, I would like to take alook at it. I have used Tony's spec file, but done some smaall modify. My goal has been to make spec file almost exactly what you already does, but never had actually time to make it. Next thing when we have good spec file should be that it will be released to some repository. atrpms would be good because it support fedora and rhel.
[dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools
Hey dudes, After I made new build from CVS where is included lot of patches, dspam_admin and dspam_stat tools at least stopped working. I did try to retrain message via webui and this is result: apache 11103 96.5 0.0 14772 704 ?RN 08:50 454:09 /usr/bin/dspam_admin agg pref [EMAIL PROTECTED] it just hang there. Some happen if I try it from commandline and dspam_stat do exactly same. Any ideas what might be a problem? I run dspam with mysql db. Pelikaista / Mediatraffic Oy Jani Partanen System administrator tel. +358 505 817 817 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Partanen;Jani FN:Jani Partanen NICKNAME:JiiPee ORG:Pelikaista / Mediatraffic Oy TITLE:System administrator NOTE;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE: =0D=0A TEL;CELL;VOICE:+358 505 817 817 ADR;WORK:;;Kiventie 1;Vampula;;32610;Finland LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Kiventie 1=0D=0AVampula 32610=0D=0AFinland ADR;HOME:;;Kirjolohentie 8 a2;Saimaanharju;;54915;Finland LABEL;HOME;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Kirjolohentie 8 a2=0D=0ASaimaanharju 54915=0D=0AFinland URL;WORK:http://www.pelikaista.net BDAY:19740316 KEY;X509;ENCODING=BASE64: MIIF4zCCA8ugAwIBAgIDBAlKMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHkxEDAOBgNVBAoTB1Jvb3QgQ0Ex HjAcBgNVBAsTFWh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY2FjZXJ0Lm9yZzEiMCAGA1UEAxMZQ0EgQ2VydCBTaWdu aW5nIEF1dGhvcml0eTEhMB8GCSqGSIb3DQEJARYSc3VwcG9ydEBjYWNlcnQub3JnMB4XDTA3 MDkxMzE3NTgwMFoXDTA4MDMxMTE3NTgwMFowgfoxGDAWBgNVBAMTD0NBY2VydCBXb1QgVXNl cjEhMB8GCSqGSIb3DQEJARYSamlpcGVlQHNvdGFwZWxpLmZpMRowGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFgty dGZtQGlraS5maTElMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYWamlpcGVlQGxhcHBlZW5yYW50YS50azElMCMG CSqGSIb3DQEJARYWamlpcGVlQHB1bmtzYnVzdGVkLmNvbTEkMCIGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYVamlp cGVlQHBlbGlrYWlzdGEubmV0MSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxqYW5pLnBhcnRhbmVuQHRhaXBh bHNhYXJpLmZpMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDl83O7QtdjBWktNPf2lY3B +qCEbQupvvTM7oVgtAC4cugmx3ov/i964M2FA+XuoETstu7bKGJpcweslqB/r1FnjYFPllBw fwEXEmd+PhDRI2A+Mi7BhtZXcZdKipOQ/CX6ND2mjKMneuhcImAEUwsHZ1rvQjfUZc8yNdco A7JhjwIDAQABo4IBdDCCAXAwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADBWBglghkgBhvhCAQ0ESRZHVG8gZ2V0 IHlvdXIgb3duIGNlcnRpZmljYXRlIGZvciBGUkVFIGhlYWQgb3ZlciB0byBodHRwOi8vd3d3 LkNBY2VydC5vcmcwQAYDVR0lBDkwNwYIKwYBBQUHAwQGCCsGAQUFBwMCBgorBgEEAYI3CgME BgorBgEEAYI3CgMDBglghkgBhvhCBAEwMgYIKwYBBQUHAQEEJjAkMCIGCCsGAQUFBzABhhZo dHRwOi8vb2NzcC5jYWNlcnQub3JnMIGRBgNVHREEgYkwgYaBEmppaXBlZUBzb3RhcGVsaS5m aYELcnRmbUBpa2kuZmmBFmppaXBlZUBsYXBwZWVucmFudGEudGuBFmppaXBlZUBwdW5rc2J1 c3RlZC5jb22BFWppaXBlZUBwZWxpa2Fpc3RhLm5ldIEcamFuaS5wYXJ0YW5lbkB0YWlwYWxz YWFyaS5maTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAgEAckQdO/e2RQdYnC45HEevwhDCcBPELtYCgGvB I8eS1ibR8WAtz0pEiMpV4GWicgimU5vsgwHZvnAxNx8yB49xvqlELFYZRmcvVktptKiLaHBR FdNeUEYzJoJT5AUretzOsf+hsTTPYs39GR5Zob5cnt//ojr7QvgqsJ575ww4txnnMclx6bD8 4E3np0xcss9Z3SH1QB4GKTDV23V8sXG9PIuUrpRt1MP6fWvZnEE2GoJG6Qijuutr5JsToof/ Jez8wmUkrtq0CsmeliNjG6zuYBYXPE9Fw0IM2Dh9NtGwMcMH31pu6glbmEjnwWBH7kF7rqCV 3a/Jc4NtBv3C+h7sI1sKnYpV3cjF632JznOUP5NbeZ0ji7aqbdEIfjZpIbiUMI7nMCMufmu5 P79x8u2iYuV7/oQAu+ieq28t5qFrfzb+0MfCtyABwuQ6244VSpnYC+9d7QfEPgZektR7uVdH KWxBtMQ3X+HZ/Oq3u6sCEEH6jC/4fzv5vfutr4kbiNTdBDa8I/c0YlvnpODInCOsRGjbCeTx hyoIvH5Hrh4alMaXnuwl8yam+7GEGSnFCj6P7kaFCc2TRwjEgMtobIu8k6TGCNvwNDGKDYqc 7ye65+OBNMVNBRQfYA7l1dalRDAwBANVR3HBLiKt6CtzT1B6Jf7MtSPaRmQDxudnlmiCJHs= EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] REV:20071008T022046Z END:VCARD
RE: [dspam-users] Dspam Fork?
Maybe it would be better to start new project into sf.net for example? There is everything ready what is needed. Just a new name and adopt latest dspam code.. Thats what has happen with amavis and many other projects before. Amavis actually have seen 2 different project, amavisd-new and maia mailguard. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cockings Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 9:49 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: [dspam-users] Dspam Fork? What happened to the ideas of a Dspam fork? Did anyone every get a response from Sensory Networks? (if you monitor the list please respond!) Does anyone have any thoughts on how the project can move forward when there is such a diverse user base, many different patches for many different set-ups, and several web guis etc - I can't fit the size of all that into my brain. I think at least two people offered trac/svn/webspace - did anyone come forward as admin? Any takers? Paul
RE: [dspam-users] Dspam Fork?
Well if I remember right, Jonathan has said his opinion already. It's GNU licensed, so anyone is free to use dspam as base for new project, just follow the instructions of license. /* DSPAM COPYRIGHT (C) 2002-2006 JONATHAN A. ZDZIARSKI This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */ gentoo community has made alot patches for dspam and what I have read gentoo forum, there is some people who does know dspam inside out, so it would be very good for project if some of them would join if there will be a new project based dspam. I don't know debian community well but I think they have done some tweaking too. Not to forget all 20 or something like that patches what is posted on devs list. -Original Message- From: Paul Cockings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 10:19 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [dspam-users] Dspam Fork? My preference would be if the dspam community as a whole could move to a new project, but I'm not sure if anyone will come! A new project would need to maintain the bulk of the knowledgeable people found here, a return of Jonathan in some way if he is able, and a structured way that we can all commit back those patches without turning dspam into a black hole of focused smaller projects, that in time will become unmaintained. I see a need for a fork, but have no experience of a project lead in this way - the setup on sf.net is the easy bit, but will anyone else be interested if I did it? Paul Jani Partanen wrote: Maybe it would be better to start new project into sf.net for example? There is everything ready what is needed. Just a new name and adopt latest dspam code.. Thats what has happen with amavis and many other projects before. Amavis actually have seen 2 different project, amavisd-new and maia mailguard. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cockings Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 9:49 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: [dspam-users] Dspam Fork? What happened to the ideas of a Dspam fork? Did anyone every get a response from Sensory Networks? (if you monitor the list please respond!) Does anyone have any thoughts on how the project can move forward when there is such a diverse user base, many different patches for many different set-ups, and several web guis etc - I can't fit the size of all that into my brain. I think at least two people offered trac/svn/webspace - did anyone come forward as admin? Any takers? Paul
RE: [dspam-users] DSpam + Postfix - what's the best way?
You problem most likely was that you used TEFT mode for training, you should use TOE mode, global group and database purge and you should never hit 30G database. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benedicto Júnior Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 7:52 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: Re: [dspam-users] DSpam + Postfix - what's the best way? Hi fellows, I am a DSPAM/Postfix enthusiastic and used this pair for some time. I need a solution for 20,000 accounts and aproximate 500,000 messages/day. The problem was that, even with all the databases tunnings I found, my dedicated mysql server got this huge ammount of records (~30Gb) and didn't handled the system at a satisfactory time. So, sadly, I had to drop to spamassassin/postfix without bayes and everything is working, except for a lots of false positives and false negatives. I thought maybe it was a mysql problem and a solution with other database handler would solve the problem. I would realy apreciate any directions you point to me to get my dspam running again. Thanks, Ben (sorry for the english) Tony Earnshaw escreveu: David Reid skrev, on 09-11-2007 13:09: Think the subject line says it all. I've been using DSPAM + Postfix for a while now and it works, but last time I posted someone mentioned a different (better?) way of integrating the two. So, rather than trying to hunt round the web for the various howto's and write ups (many of which seem very out of date or incomplete), can anyone here point me at a current, up to date resource for what they think is the best way to use DSPAM with Postfix? Obviously my way is the best way of integrating dspam with Postfix (and amavisd-new, whatever). But I'll be damned if I'll do a writeup on it; tell what you what you want, what you've done and doesn't work. I have had a philosophy of exactly what I wanted dspam to do with messages from Postfix, integrating that with amavisd-new. And heavy shell scripting. And OpenLDAP. And MySQL. I'm a Unix/Linux sysadmin and used to thinking for myself. Best, --Tonni
RE: [dspam-users] Setting training mode fails
TOE = Train On Error TUM = Train Until Mature TEFT = Train Every Fucking Time Copy paste from conf: # Training Mode: The default training mode to use for all operations, when # one has not been specified on the commandline or in the user's preferences. # Acceptable values are: # toe Train on Error (Only) # teftTrain Everything (Trains on every message) # tum Train Until Mature (Train only tokens without enough data) # notrain Do not train or store signatures (large ISP systems, post-train) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Auke Jilderda Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 10:28 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: [dspam-users] Setting training mode fails Hi, I have been using DSpam for a year or so and am very happy to see it has restored sanity to my mail boxes. Recently though, I noticed its run-time data has grown to huge amounts with some users' user.sig directory at over 1 GB at the moment. It looks like DSpam continues to train on every incoming message even though (I think) I configured it to train on errors only. (Can anybody tell me what the various training modes stand for? I reckon TOE means Train On Error. What does TUM and TEFT exactly mean?) I run DSpam 3.6.8 on Debian 4.0. I have set TrainingMode teft and AllowOverride trainingMode in /etc/dspam/dspam.conf. In addition, /etc/dspam/default.prefs contains trainingMode=TOE (after having set this in the admin section in the web interface). Finally, the users involved here have their personal preferences set to train only when the filter makes a mistake. Despite this configuration, DSpam continues to store a .sig for each new message. Any ideas why? Thanks, Auke
RE: [dspam-users] Setting training mode fails
Well there is global settings and user settings. If you allow user to overwrite global settings, then it might be that user setting is still TEFT -Original Message- From: Auke Jilderda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 11:46 PM To: Jani Partanen Cc: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: RE: [dspam-users] Setting training mode fails Thanks Jani. I thought I had seen it somewhere but just couldn't find it back. Turns out I had deleted it from my config file and I couldn't find it on DSpam's web pages. Anyway, on to my primary question: Why does DSpam keep storing signatures while I have it very much configured to train on error? Auke TOE = Train On Error TUM = Train Until Mature TEFT = Train Every Fucking Time Copy paste from conf: # Training Mode: The default training mode to use for all operations, when # one has not been specified on the commandline or in the user's preferences. # Acceptable values are: # toe Train on Error (Only) # teftTrain Everything (Trains on every message) # tum Train Until Mature (Train only tokens without enough data) # notrain Do not train or store signatures (large ISP systems, post-train) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Auke Jilderda Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 10:28 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: [dspam-users] Setting training mode fails Hi, I have been using DSpam for a year or so and am very happy to see it has restored sanity to my mail boxes. Recently though, I noticed its run-time data has grown to huge amounts with some users' user.sig directory at over 1 GB at the moment. It looks like DSpam continues to train on every incoming message even though (I think) I configured it to train on errors only. (Can anybody tell me what the various training modes stand for? I reckon TOE means Train On Error. What does TUM and TEFT exactly mean?) I run DSpam 3.6.8 on Debian 4.0. I have set TrainingMode teft and AllowOverride trainingMode in /etc/dspam/dspam.conf. In addition, /etc/dspam/default.prefs contains trainingMode=TOE (after having set this in the admin section in the web interface). Finally, the users involved here have their personal preferences set to train only when the filter makes a mistake. Despite this configuration, DSpam continues to store a .sig for each new message. Any ideas why? Thanks, Auke
RE: [dspam-users] analysis graph: x axis only has one data point
Are you using virtual aliases? I get this also if I try to view my other aliases details. And spam marking isn't working also. But everything works fine for master address. -Original Message- From: Cory Coager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 5:29 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Cc: Jani Partanen Subject: Re: [dspam-users] analysis graph: x axis only has one data point Here you go: http://www.endosoft.com/download/dspam%20x-axis.gif Jani Partanen wrote: Maybe little more details would be good, like example shot or something. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cory Coager Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 4:12 AM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: [dspam-users] analysis graph: x axis only has one data point For some reason on the analysis graph, my X axis only has one data point for both hour and day graphs. How can I change this?
RE: [dspam-users] analysis graph: x axis only has one data point
Have you made symlink into /var/dspam/data/ or what ever is your dspam home dir to reflect /var/dspam/.dspam/ ? Something like: lrwxrwxrwx 1 dspam dspam 9 4. heinä 08:29 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ../.dspam and in /var/dspam/.dspam/ folder I have: ls ../.dspam/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ../.dspam/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ../.dspam/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ../.dspam/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ../.dspam/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ../.dspam/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ../.dspam/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ../.dspam/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ../.dspam/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ../.dspam/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ../.dspam/[EMAIL PROTECTED] And all other users datafiles. Thats where dspam need some work. I don't like at all of this that I have one folder full of all kind of stuff what would be much better to keep in sql database when you run virtual system. -Original Message- From: Cory Coager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 5:43 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Cc: Jani Partanen Subject: Re: [dspam-users] analysis graph: x axis only has one data point Yes, it is a virtual setup, I only have one user. So this doesn't work then? Is there a bug open for this? Jani Partanen wrote: Are you using virtual aliases? I get this also if I try to view my other aliases details. And spam marking isn't working also. But everything works fine for master address. -Original Message- From: Cory Coager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 5:29 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Cc: Jani Partanen Subject: Re: [dspam-users] analysis graph: x axis only has one data point Here you go: http://www.endosoft.com/download/dspam%20x-axis.gif Jani Partanen wrote: Maybe little more details would be good, like example shot or something. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cory Coager Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 4:12 AM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: [dspam-users] analysis graph: x axis only has one data point For some reason on the analysis graph, my X axis only has one data point for both hour and day graphs. How can I change this?
RE: [dspam-users] analysis graph: x axis only has one data point
Maybe little more details would be good, like example shot or something. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cory Coager Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 4:12 AM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: [dspam-users] analysis graph: x axis only has one data point For some reason on the analysis graph, my X axis only has one data point for both hour and day graphs. How can I change this?
RE: [dspam-users] Problem with global spam/ham alias
Noone can't help?
I have still this problem and I haven't found any solution.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jani Partanen
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 5:20 PM
To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
Subject: [dspam-users] Problem with global spam/ham alias
Hello,
I try to setup global ham/spam alias but can't get it work..
what I have done is I have setup to postfix master.cf this:
dspam-retrain unix- n n - 10 pipe
flags=Ru user=dspam argv=/usr/bin/dspam --user ${sender}
--class=${nexthop} --source=error
and into transport I have put this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]dspam-retrain:spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dspam-retrain:innocent
okey so this all seems to be good, system accept both address
as valid and accept mail, but when I forward message to spam
address, I get into maillog this:
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo postfix/cleanup[29289]: 2C6DC1E8088:
message-id=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo postfix/qmgr[29283]: 2C6DC1E8088:
from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=15350, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo dspam[29291]: Unable to find a valid
signature. Aborting.
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo dspam[29291]: process_message
returned error -5. dropping message.
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo postfix/pipe[29290]: 2C6DC1E8088:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=dspam-retrain, delay=0.61,
delays=0.59/0.01/0 /0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered
via dspam-retrain service) Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo
postfix/qmgr[29283]: 2C6DC1E8088: removed
and into dspam.debug log I see this:
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] DSPAM Instance Startup
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] input args: /usr/bin/dspam
--user [EMAIL PROTECTED] --class=spam --source=error
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] pass-thru args:
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] processing user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] uid = 1003, euid = 1003, gid =
1003, egid = 0
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] loading preferences for user
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] Loading preferences for uid 6
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] Loading preferences for uid 0
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] loaded default preferences externally
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] using
/var/dspam/opt-in/[EMAIL PROTECTED] as path
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] using
/var/dspam/opt-out/[EMAIL PROTECTED] as path
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] sedation level set to: 5
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] message is signed. retaining
original text for reassembly
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] message is signed. retaining
original text for reassembly
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] DSPAM Instance Shutdown. Exit Code: 0
So does anyone have idea what I am doing wrong?
Mail does have signature and it's in header, I have setup my
outlook to forward messages as attachment so everything
should be fine I think..
Pelikaista / Mediatraffic Oy
Jani Partanen
System administrator
tel. +358 505 817 817
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [dspam-users] Problem with global spam/ham alias
Yes I have it there. Any other ideas?
_
From: Mankuthimma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 5:49 AM
To: Jani Partanen
Cc: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
Subject: Re: [dspam-users] Problem with global spam/ham alias
Hi,
Make sure you have the following in your dspam.conf
Opt out
- shashi
On 9/30/07, Jani Partanen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
I try to setup global ham/spam alias but can't get it work..
what I have done is I have setup to postfix master.cf this:
dspam-retrain unix- n n - 10 pipe
flags=Ru user=dspam argv=/usr/bin/dspam --user ${sender}
--class=${nexthop} --source=error
and into transport I have put this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]dspam-retrain:spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dspam-retrain:innocent
okey so this all seems to be good, system accept both address as valid and
accept mail, but when I forward message to spam address, I get into maillog
this:
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo postfix/cleanup[29289]: 2C6DC1E8088:
message-id=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo postfix/qmgr[29283]: 2C6DC1E8088: from=
[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=15350, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo dspam[29291]: Unable to find a valid signature.
Aborting.
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo dspam[29291]: process_message returned error -5.
dropping message.
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo postfix/pipe[29290]: 2C6DC1E8088:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=dspam-retrain, delay=0.61, delays=0.59/0.01/0
/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via dspam-retrain service)
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo postfix/qmgr[29283]: 2C6DC1E8088: removed
and into dspam.debug log I see this:
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] DSPAM Instance Startup
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] input args: /usr/bin/dspam --user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --class=spam --source=error
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] pass-thru args:
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] processing user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] uid = 1003, euid = 1003, gid = 1003, egid = 0
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] loading preferences for user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] Loading preferences for uid 6
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] Loading preferences for uid 0
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] loaded default preferences externally
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] using /var/dspam/opt-
mailto:in/[EMAIL PROTECTED] in/[EMAIL PROTECTED] as path
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] using
/var/dspam/opt-out/[EMAIL PROTECTED] as path
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] sedation level set to: 5
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] message is signed. retaining original text for
reassembly
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] message is signed. retaining original text for
reassembly
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] DSPAM Instance Shutdown. Exit Code: 0
So does anyone have idea what I am doing wrong?
Mail does have signature and it's in header, I have setup my outlook to
forward messages as attachment so everything should be fine I think..
Pelikaista / Mediatraffic Oy
Jani Partanen
System administrator
tel. +358 505 817 817
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
- Shashishekhar S
RE: [dspam-users] Problem with global spam/ham alias
Bah! I think that problem was actually outlook 2003, I have set it to
include message as attachment when forwarding, but seems like it strip all
header information away.. Maybe it's some outlook setting what I haven't
noticed.
I tested it from thunderbird and there wasn't any errors and debug log was
also good.
_
From: Mankuthimma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 6:02 AM
To: Jani Partanen
Cc: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
Subject: Re: [dspam-users] Problem with global spam/ham alias
Hi,
Did you try sending the spam manually, as in
# su dspam
dspam$ cat spammail.txt | /usr/bin/dspam --user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--class=spam --source=error
What's the output ?
- shashi
On 9/30/07, Jani Partanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I try to setup global ham/spam alias but can't get it work..
what I have done is I have setup to postfix master.cf this:
dspam-retrain unix- n n - 10 pipe
flags=Ru user=dspam argv=/usr/bin/dspam --user ${sender}
--class=${nexthop} --source=error
and into transport I have put this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]dspam-retrain:spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dspam-retrain:innocent
okey so this all seems to be good, system accept both address as valid and
accept mail, but when I forward message to spam address, I get into maillog
this:
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo postfix/cleanup[29289]: 2C6DC1E8088:
message-id=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo postfix/qmgr[29283]: 2C6DC1E8088: from=
[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=15350, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo dspam[29291]: Unable to find a valid signature.
Aborting.
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo dspam[29291]: process_message returned error -5.
dropping message.
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo postfix/pipe[29290]: 2C6DC1E8088:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=dspam-retrain, delay=0.61, delays=0.59/0.01/0
/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via dspam-retrain service)
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo postfix/qmgr[29283]: 2C6DC1E8088: removed
and into dspam.debug log I see this:
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] DSPAM Instance Startup
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] input args: /usr/bin/dspam --user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --class=spam --source=error
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] pass-thru args:
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] processing user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] uid = 1003, euid = 1003, gid = 1003, egid = 0
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] loading preferences for user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] Loading preferences for uid 6
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] Loading preferences for uid 0
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] loaded default preferences externally
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] using /var/dspam/opt-
mailto:in/[EMAIL PROTECTED] in/[EMAIL PROTECTED] as path
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] using
/var/dspam/opt-out/[EMAIL PROTECTED] as path
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] sedation level set to: 5
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] message is signed. retaining original text for
reassembly
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] message is signed. retaining original text for
reassembly
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] DSPAM Instance Shutdown. Exit Code: 0
So does anyone have idea what I am doing wrong?
Mail does have signature and it's in header, I have setup my outlook to
forward messages as attachment so everything should be fine I think..
Pelikaista / Mediatraffic Oy
Jani Partanen
System administrator
tel. +358 505 817 817
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
- Shashishekhar S
[dspam-users] Problem with global spam/ham alias
Hello,
I try to setup global ham/spam alias but can't get it work..
what I have done is I have setup to postfix master.cf this:
dspam-retrain unix- n n - 10 pipe
flags=Ru user=dspam argv=/usr/bin/dspam --user ${sender} --class=${nexthop}
--source=error
and into transport I have put this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]dspam-retrain:spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dspam-retrain:innocent
okey so this all seems to be good, system accept both address as valid and
accept mail, but when I forward message to spam address, I get into maillog
this:
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo postfix/cleanup[29289]: 2C6DC1E8088: message-id=[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo postfix/qmgr[29283]: 2C6DC1E8088: from=[EMAIL
PROTECTED], size=15350, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo dspam[29291]: Unable to find a valid signature.
Aborting.
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo dspam[29291]: process_message returned error -5.
dropping message.
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo postfix/pipe[29290]: 2C6DC1E8088: to=[EMAIL
PROTECTED], relay=dspam-retrain, delay=0.61, delays=0.59/0.01/0
/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via dspam-retrain service)
Sep 30 17:09:59 rottelo postfix/qmgr[29283]: 2C6DC1E8088: removed
and into dspam.debug log I see this:
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] DSPAM Instance Startup
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] input args: /usr/bin/dspam --user [EMAIL
PROTECTED] --class=spam --source=error
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] pass-thru args:
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] processing user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] uid = 1003, euid = 1003, gid = 1003, egid = 0
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] loading preferences for user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] Loading preferences for uid 6
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] Loading preferences for uid 0
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] loaded default preferences externally
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] using /var/dspam/opt-in/[EMAIL PROTECTED] as path
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] using /var/dspam/opt-out/[EMAIL PROTECTED] as path
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] sedation level set to: 5
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] message is signed. retaining original text for
reassembly
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] message is signed. retaining original text for
reassembly
29291: [09/30/2007 17:09:59] DSPAM Instance Shutdown. Exit Code: 0
So does anyone have idea what I am doing wrong?
Mail does have signature and it's in header, I have setup my outlook to forward
messages as attachment so everything should be fine I think..
Pelikaista / Mediatraffic Oy
Jani Partanen
System administrator
tel. +358 505 817 817
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Partanen;Jani
FN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ORG:Pelikaista / Mediatraffic Oy
TITLE:System administrator
TEL;CELL;VOICE:+358 505 817 817
ADR;WORK:;;Kiventie 1;Vampula;;32610;Finland
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Kiventie 1=0D=0AVampula 32610=0D=0AFinland
ADR;HOME:;;Kirjolohentie 8 a2;Saimaanharju;;54915;Finland
LABEL;HOME;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Kirjolohentie 8 a2=0D=0ASaimaanharju 54915=0D=0AFinland
URL;WORK:http://www.pelikaista.net
KEY;X509;ENCODING=BASE64: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: [dspam-users] No help from this list?
You are using sendmail right? I think majority here use something else than sendmail, because sendmail isn't really user friendly to configure IMHO. I myself run postfix, dspam, amavisd-new, dbmail. If you did ask postfix related question, I bet you would get answer. There really migh be only few if any using sendmail. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lisa Casey Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:25 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: Re: [dspam-users] No help from this list? Well, I've almost got it working but not quite. Mail does go through dspam but I still have a couple of issues I can't figure out. I've asked for help, I've googled, I've read everything I found regarding dspam. I give up. I'm really sorry because I really wanted to use dspam. Lisa
[dspam-users] Need some help with webui
Well I have everything setup and function almost perfectly, I get all global information / stats but not any user spam statictics. Seems like cgi tries to find files from wrong location.. I have virtual-user system and for some reason what I don't know, all user details are in /var/dspam/.dspam and global stuff are in /var/dspam I have try to run cgi scripts with suexec but result is exactly same. Users can change their settings but can't see stats / quarantine. Oh and version is 3.8.0 Pelikaista / Mediatraffic Oy Jani Partanen Battlefield 2 admin tel. +358 505 817 817 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Partanen;Jani FN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG:Pelikaista / Mediatraffic Oy TITLE:Battlefield admin TEL;CELL;VOICE:+358 505 817 817 ADR;WORK:;;Kirjolohentie 8 a2;Saimaanharju;;54915;Finland LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Kirjolohentie 8 a2=0D=0ASaimaanharju 54915=0D=0AFinland ADR;HOME:;;Kirjolohentie 8 a2;Saimaanharju;;54915;Finland LABEL;HOME;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Kirjolohentie 8 a2=0D=0ASaimaanharju 54915=0D=0AFinland URL;WORK:http://www.pelikaista.net EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] REV:20060812T221011Z END:VCARD
