G'Day,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 11:40:04PM -0800, Matthieu Chase Heimer wrote:
If there is a better place to report this please let me know.
This is best.
When adding the inclusive method execution time it is required to use the
complete method signature. The problem is likely to be present
Yes - it is expected to have a longer *inclusive*
elapsed time. This is
one of a number of reasons why understanding
inclusive times is difficult.
Note that the inclusive time reports delibrately
don't include a Total
line - since that would add to the confusion.
Consider:
#
So I think I'm managed to make an example that is working correctly even for
reentrance. It does complicate the script a little bit though.
http://www.osdev.org/dtrace/hotspot_extras/j_calltime2.d
Top 10 inclusive method elapsed times (us),
PID TYPE TOTAL NAME
1683 method
If there is a better place to report this please let me know.
When adding the inclusive method execution time it is required to use the
complete method signature. The problem is likely to be present in other scripts
but I've verified it in the Java related scripts that calculate inclusive and
