Re: [dtrace-discuss] RES: Process in LCK / SLP (Please)

2008-04-21 Thread przemolicc
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 02:40:15PM -0400, Jonathan Adams wrote: On Apr 18, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Kleyson Rios wrote: Hi przemol, Bellow output of plockstat for malloc and libumem. Both many locks. Why changing to libumem I didn't get less locks ? You're looking at Mutex hold

Re: [dtrace-discuss] RES: Process in LCK / SLP (Please)

2008-04-18 Thread Jonathan Adams
On Apr 18, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Kleyson Rios wrote: Hi przemol, Bellow output of plockstat for malloc and libumem. Both many locks. Why changing to libumem I didn't get less locks ? You're looking at Mutex hold statistics, which don't mean a lot (unless contention is caused by long hold