[dtrace-discuss] RES: Process in LCK / SLP (Please)

2008-04-23 Thread Kleyson Rios
PROTECTED] Enviada em: quarta-feira, 23 de abril de 2008 01:11 Para: Kleyson Rios Cc: dtrace-discuss@opensolaris.org Assunto: Re: [dtrace-discuss] RES: RES: Process in LCK / SLP (Please) You may want to cross-post to a Java alias, but I've been down this road before. Java will call into malloc

Re: [dtrace-discuss] RES: Process in LCK / SLP (Please)

2008-04-21 Thread przemolicc
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 02:40:15PM -0400, Jonathan Adams wrote: On Apr 18, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Kleyson Rios wrote: Hi przemol, Bellow output of plockstat for malloc and libumem. Both many locks. Why changing to libumem I didn't get less locks ? You're looking at Mutex hold

[dtrace-discuss] RES: Process in LCK / SLP (Please)

2008-04-18 Thread Kleyson Rios
Hi przemol, Bellow output of plockstat for malloc and libumem. Both many locks. Why changing to libumem I didn't get less locks ? ** Plockstat using malloc (many many locks): Mutex hold Count nsec Lock Caller

Re: [dtrace-discuss] RES: Process in LCK / SLP (Please)

2008-04-18 Thread Jonathan Adams
On Apr 18, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Kleyson Rios wrote: Hi przemol, Bellow output of plockstat for malloc and libumem. Both many locks. Why changing to libumem I didn't get less locks ? You're looking at Mutex hold statistics, which don't mean a lot (unless contention is caused by long hold

[dtrace-discuss] RES: Process in LCK / SLP (Please)

2008-04-17 Thread Kleyson Rios
Tanks everybody. I will try to do what you guys said. When I get new issues I post again. Regards, Kleyson Rios. -Mensagem original- De: Jarod Jenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: quarta-feira, 16 de abril de 2008 16:56 Para: Peter B. Kessler Cc: Kleyson Rios;