Hey,
As a new Dumux user I will be very interested in such a meeting.
My effective participation will ultimately depends upon an early date selection
so that they can be blocked on my schedule before other constraints show up
JF
De : Dumux [dumux-boun...@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de] de la part d
Dear Dumux users,
it seems to me that enough people outside of our Stuttgart working group
could be interested in a Dumux user meeting. I can think of ~2 days here
in Stuttgart in late spring / early summer, which we could divide in
presentations by the users and hands-on problem-solving/-crea
Hi Bernd,Thank you for the help.Could you please explain me how the step size
is determined adaptively indumux? Where can I find more details?BestHaiĀ
On Tuesday, December 2, 2014 11:12 AM, Bernd Flemisch
wrote:
Hi Hai,
implementing another time discretization will be a non-triv
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below.
User who did this - Bernd Flemisch (bernd)
Attached to Project - DuMuX
Summary - Generalize velocity calculation for implicit models
Task Type - Feature Request
Category - General
Status - New
Hi Jean-Francois,
the velocities are calculated in
dumux/implicit/common/implicitvelocityoutput.hh. As the message says,
the implementation assumes at a few lines that one has
quadrilaterals/hexahedrons. At a first glance, it does not seem to be
very difficult to generalize. I will open a Fly
Hi Hai,
implementing another time discretization will be a non-trivial task. For
the implicit models, the implicit Euler method is hardcoded in
dumux/implicit/common/implicitlocalresidual.hh. In the routine
evalVolumeTerms_, the time derivative is set to the first-order finite
difference and