Hi Lars, sry for the late answer, somehow your mail was classified as spam :(. To the best of my knowledge, periodic boundaries are not implemented for the free-flow models and thus currently just ignored. Please be so kind and open an issue (feature request) on GitLab (https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/issues <https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/issues>). I currently don’t have time to look at it, but maybe some other developer?
Best wishes, Timo > On 17. Aug 2019, at 12:25, Lars Kaiser <lars.kai...@jgw-ev.de> wrote: > > Dear Dumux users, > > i want to set up a simulation similar to "ex_interface_coupling_ff-pm.cc" > from the dumux-courses. However i struggle with implementing periodic > boundary conditions in x direction for the staggered freeflow grid, it seems > to work for the pm-grid. > Following this hint > <https://www.mail-archive.com/dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/msg01926.html> > from the mailing list i changed the yasp grid to a spgrid and tried to make > the grid periodic: > .input file: Periodic true false or > .dgf file: PERIODICFACETRANSFORMATION: 1 0, 0 1 + 1 0 > > I had no success and made a MWE for the ff-region which you can find in the > attachment. > I am thankful for every hint. > > Best regards, > Lars > <CMakeLists.txt><ffproblem.hh><Stokes.dgf><stokesperiodic.cc><stokesperiodic.input>_______________________________________________ > Dumux mailing list > Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de > https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
_______________________________________________ Dumux mailing list Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux