Re: [DuMuX] dumux: change constitutive relations

2018-10-27 Thread Timo Koch
> On 26. Oct 2018, at 16:35, lc wrote: > > Dear developers, maintainers and users, > > I'm encountering some difficulties in applying a new Material law which is > not regularized and doesn't use EffToAbsLaw. > > > I did as suggested previously, but when I comment the following lines I get

Re: [DuMuX] dumux: change constitutive relations

2018-10-26 Thread lc
Dear developers, maintainers and users, I'm encountering some difficulties in applying a new Material law which is not regularized and doesn't use EffToAbsLaw. I did as suggested previously, but when I comment the following lines I get an error: #include //typedef EffToAbsLaw type; In

Re: [DuMuX] dumux: change constitutive relations

2018-10-17 Thread Timo Koch
Hi Lorenzo, On 17.10.2018 15:21, lc wrote: Dear developers and users, I have some other questions. 1) I successfully ran the tutorial_implicit  example from the handbook 2.12. Now, I need to modify such test case in order to be consistent with my requirements. In particular, I need to

[DuMuX] dumux: change constitutive relations

2018-10-17 Thread lc
Dear developers and users, I have some other questions. 1) I successfully ran the tutorial_implicit  example from the handbook 2.12. Now, I need to modify such test case in order to be consistent with my requirements. In particular, I need to use a different relative permeability and