Hi Georg,
this is possible. What exactly is your problem? Is there a compiler error?
Timo
On 27.04.2018 09:19, georg.fut...@dlr.de<mailto:georg.fut...@dlr.de> wrote:
Hello Dumuxers,
My question is related to the property system: Is it possible to use a type
from the TypeTag in a defi
On 24.05.2018 13:42, berk.ner...@uzh.ch<mailto:berk.ner...@uzh.ch> wrote:
Hi Timo,
I think the errors from build_tests are not that important for me anyways.
The fact that the tracer test and some other models are not properly linked to
the build-cmake folder is the bigger p
Hi Edscott,
would you open a merge request with the changes on the dumux GitLab?
Timo
> Am 23.01.2018 um 00:08 schrieb Edscott Wilson
> <edscott.wilson.gar...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> Hi Timo,
>
> Seems like a mistake in
> dumux/dumux/material/constraintsolvers
Hi Christoph,
thanks for testing! Although it's still in alpha everything should compile,
however we didn't test a lot of compilers yet. Everything does compile with gcc
7.2.0. Can you maybe open some issues with compiler errors you get and the
compiler version?
Best wishes,
Timo
>
-uggrid repository with the
error message when compiling "dune-uggrid/np/algebra/blasm.cc".
You can also try dune-alugrid if you just want an unstructured grid
implementation.
Best wishes
Timo
On 07.03.2018 11:48, Håkon Hægland wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> here follows a short update
would have to write each value separately as far as
I know.
Best wishes,
Timo
On 06/16/2015 12:00 PM, dumux-requ...@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de wrote:
Send Dumux mailing list submissions to
dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
would have to write each value separately as far as
I know.
Best wishes,
Timo
On 06/16/2015 12:00 PM, dumux-requ...@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de wrote:
Send Dumux mailing list submissions to
dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
would have to write each value separately as far as
I know.
Best wishes,
Timo
On 06/16/2015 12:00 PM, dumux-requ...@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de wrote:
Send Dumux mailing list submissions to
dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
to /
shouldn't do that in the function already.
I hope this works out for you.
Timo
On 08/11/2015 02:50 PM, georg.fut...@dlr.de wrote:
Hello Dumux,
I am still struggling with the boundary conditions for my system. What
I want to do for the cathode side of my fuel cell model is depicted in
Figure1
the other part of the flux.
All the best
Timo
Am 11.08.2015 um 16:54 schrieb georg.fut...@dlr.de georg.fut...@dlr.de:
Hi Timo,
Thanks for your quick reply J. I guess the most basic problem I have is: is
it possible to set grad(S)=0 as a boundary condition? If yes, how can it be
done
as already said with the solDependentNeumann approach from before.
On 08/12/2015 08:59 AM, georg.fut...@dlr.de wrote:
Yes that is true. Is it possible to set grad pc*n = 0?
*Von:*Timo Koch [mailto:timo.k...@iws.uni-stuttgart.de]
*Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 12. August 2015 08:56
*An:* Futter, Georg
but then grad pc = dpc/dsw*grad sw so setting grad pc*n = 0 should be same as
grad s*n =0 if I'm not wrong?
Best regards,
Timo
Am 12.08.2015 um 08:26 schrieb georg.fut...@dlr.de georg.fut...@dlr.de:
I see… The saturation influences the fluxes only indirectly via the
pc-Sw-relation
be easily used in DuMux via the input file, e.g.
[Grid]
File = path/mygrid.msh
the same way you read dgf files.
Best wishes,
Timo
On 23.10.2015 12:29, Jelena Grižić wrote:
Thanks Timo!
Is it possible to write triangular prism mesh in dgf file or maybe to
read from msh file? I have very complex
roblem on our feature/globalvectors branch that
has some major changes and improvements over the current version. There,
everything looked fine.
We have to look into the issue on the boundaries, so stay tuned.
Best wishes
Timo
On 22.07.2016 14:15, NGO Tri Dat wrote:
Hi Bernd,
You ca
Hi Tri Dat,
On 22.07.2016 18:41, NGO Tri Dat wrote:
Hi Timo,
Thank you for your feedback!
For information, I have also a simulation of 2p flow in another
2d-in-3d DFN.
I considered the behavior of a LNAPL plume in a medium initially
saturated with water, hydrostatic pressure for initial
tml#mc-manual.mpiwrap)
during debugging with mpi parallel programs.
Kind regards
Timo
On 08.02.2017 13:06, Bernd Flemisch wrote:
Hi Mustapha,
as Christoph says, we should try to make the example as minimal as
possible.
On 02/08/2017 09:56 AM, Mustapha El Ossmani wrote:
We have run a simple tes
fields than
currently implemented but they
are going to be more complicated / time consuming.
Do you need good velocities for e.g. particle tracking?
Best wishes
Timo
On 20.10.2016 15:08, NGO Tri Dat wrote:
Hi Dumuxers,
I have just done a simple test of 1p model with a pressure gradient
. The
cellcentered FV just needs a bit more treatment on the bifurcation to
ensure mass conservation and pressure continuity which you get for free
with the box method.
Best wishes
Timo
On 20.10.2016 16:45, NGO Tri Dat wrote:
Hi Timo,
I also saw the comments which indicate that the velocity
Hi Alex,
I think what you are looking for (2D radial symmetric problem) is not
implemented anywhere. It would require to set different "extrusion factors"
for x-faces, y-faces and volumes. You would have to implement these
scalings manually at the right places.
Che
Hi Claudia,
you can find the examples described in the paper here for the moment:
https://gitlab.dune-project.org/tkoch/dune-foamgrid-examples
Best wishes
Timo
Viele Grüße,
Timo
> Am 13.07.2017 um 16:33 schrieb <claudia.bortolu...@uzh.ch>
> <claudia.bortolu...@uzh.ch&
the report here. Maybe I can say something.
Best wishes,
Timo
On 20.07.2017 11:11, claudia.bortolu...@uzh.ch wrote:
Dear Timo,
Thank you for the install script and the readme file, it was very easy
to install everything.
At the moment I am still running the first example, but I have already
Hi Claudia,
yes I checked and you need Dumux 2.8. I attached an install script and
readme that should should set up everything for you.
Best Timo
On 19.07.2017 13:05, claudia.bortolu...@uzh.ch wrote:
Dear Timo,
I have tried to remove the line that include the header from
Hi Michiel,
what you did seems like the right way to do this. Try removing the build
directories and run dunecontrol again. The “found” variables are usually cached
by CMake removing the build directories removes this cache and tries to find
all modules again.
Best
Timo
> On 12. Jul 2
in parallel.
There also is a parallel test in test/porousmediumflow/richards as an example
using the box method.
Best wishes,
Timo
Viele Grüße,
Timo
Viele Grüße,
Timo
Viele Grüße,
Timo
> Am 08.12.2017 um 21:28 schrieb Ed Scott Wilson Garcia <edsc...@imp.mx>:
>
> Hello all,
Timo
--
___
Timo Koch phone: +49 711 685 64676
IWS, Universität Stuttgart fax: +49 711 685 60430
Pfaffenwaldring 61email: timo.k...@iws.uni-stuttgart.de
D-70569 Stuttgarturl
Hi Christoph,
the next branch has been merged to master. Important last minute fixes
such as missing includes were done _only_ on the master branch before
tagging.
The next branch will be removed. Please have a look at the current master.
Thanks for testing and happy new year
Timo
contact us.
Best wishes,
Timo
On 03.01.2018 17:26, Edscott Wilson wrote:
I'll chip in my feedback from a DuMux user's viewpoint.
To create DuMux problems with dune, basic generic C++ programming is a
must, so updating a particular compilation requirement either from
source or from binary
condition in Dumux <3.0. So this is done for the mass balance equation
and for the advective part of the transport (i.e. it was also imposed
that grad(x)*n is zero on this boundary). But it should work analogously
for the diffusive transport term.
I hope this helps,
Timo
On 21.06.2018 11:06, Mu
Viele Grüße,
Timo
> Am 01.08.2018 um 19:56 schrieb ALEXANDRE DE LIMA :
>
> Hello Dumuxers :)
>
> I am new at Dumux community and I am interested in Dumux with its multidomain
> features.
>
> So, I have my first question concerning how to enable/install
> dune
.
You can use solDependentNeumann to weakly enforce any boundary condition, like
a Robin/Cauchy-type. What’s on top of your domain conceptually?
Best wishes
Timo
> On 13. Aug 2018, at 17:27, Schout, G. (Gilian) wrote:
>
> Dear dumux-team,
>
> I hope you can help me solve a probl
saturation gradient (from sw=swr to sw=1 at the boundary)
it might take some time until the pressure in the boundary cell is close
to the Dirichlet value.
Best wishes
Timo
On 07.08.2018 18:00, Nikolai Andrianov wrote:
Dear DuMuX experts,
I wonder what can be the reason for the following strange
adding an actual
layer of cells at the boundary that have a different material law (maybe
pc=0) and a high porosity and high permeability (to model a non-porous
medium). Then you can also set Sw=1 / Sn = 0;
Best wishes
Timo
On 09.08.2018 19:18, Nikolai Andrianov wrote:
Dear DuMuX experts
Hi Birger,
I think you are right. In Dumux 3.0 the volume is scv.volume() though.
fvGeometry.subContVol[scvIdx].volume would be correct in Dumux 2.12 and
earlier.
Timo
Viele Grüße,
Timo
> Am 22.08.2018 um 13:08 schrieb Birger Hagemann
> :
>
> Dear Martin,
>
> The
if the code is compiled
with -O0? Not all symbols are always defined if there are optimized away so it
might look like this.
Timo
Viele Grüße,
Timo
> Am 21.08.2018 um 20:40 schrieb Edscott Wilson
> :
>
> OK.
> I'll dig into the matter a bit further to see if I can solve where the
&
the flux there. Another solution
might be, as I suggested earlier, to add an extra cell layer with different
material law (modelling a non-porous domain with big porosity and permeability
and pc=0).
Best wishes
Timo
> Am 24.08.2018 um 14:19 schrieb Martin Schneider
> :
>
> Hi Nikolai
variables you have.
Timo
Viele Grüße,
Timo
> Am 24.08.2018 um 12:04 schrieb Nikolai Andrianov :
>
> Hi Martin,
>
>
> I would like to know from within
> dumux/discretization/cellcentered/tpfa/darcyslaw.hh if TwoPFormulation::p0s1
> or TwoPFormulation::p1s0 is used.
>
, you can install it with homebrew.
After you replace the lines, delete the build directories by typing “rm -rf
d*/build-cmake” and run dune control again “./dune-common/bin/dunecontrol
—opts=cmake.opts all”. Maybe that helps.
Timo
> On 16. Jul 2018, at 13:20, Maria Bonto mailto:ma...@dtu
Hi Hermann,
yeah that’s what I meant by rescaling. This is the expected results. Good to
hear that it worked out!
See you soon
Timo
> On 16. Jul 2018, at 14:12, Hermann Zeyen wrote:
>
> Hi Timo,
>
> it's ok, it was just that Paraview started with a fixed (and wrong) color
&
Hi Hermann,
can you attach the last *.vtu file to check if this is not just a problem with
paraview?
Timo
> On 16. Jul 2018, at 13:42, Timo Koch wrote:
>
> Hi Hermann,
>
> did you go to the last time step (looks like you are showing the initial
> solution) and
Hi,
the UMFPack backend doesn't work in parallel. The only parallel backend in
currently the AMG preconditinoed BiCGSTAB.
Timo
Viele Grüße,
Timo
> Am 06.09.2018 um 18:47 schrieb Nikolai Andrianov :
>
> Dear DuMuX experts,
>
> Working with https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.
ase answer there if
possible so that others can profit from the discussion.
Best wishes
Timo
--
___
Timo Koch phone: +49 711 685 64676
IWS, Universität Stuttgart fax: +49 711 685 60430
Pfaffenwaldring 61
Hi Lorenzo,
please always ask/answer on the list, so that the answer can help other
users too.
On 15.10.2018 18:29, Lorenzo Campoli wrote:
Dear Timo,
thanks for the fast answer. I appreciate.
The crucial point for me exactly the effect of capillarity which
indeed changes completely
neglected. But this is
also easily possible in DuMux, in case you really want to neglect
capillary forces.
Best wishes, good luck getting started with DuMux and don't hesitate to
ask further questions.
Timo
Given this premises, is it possible to do in dumux? Is there already
any test
h). The simulation steps
are easier to understand in the new version. Everything I explained
above also applies for the new version.
There are exercises in the dumux-course module I told you about in my
last mail.
Best wishes
Timo
Thank you,
Lorenzo
Hi,
no, nobody needed it so far.
Timo
On 31.10.18 12:57, lc wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to ask if CUDA or any graphical processing is supported in
DUMUX.
Kind regards,
Lorenzo
___
Dumux mailing list
Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de
https
ementation is correct. Just
plot it for saturations from 0 to 1 to see all of your function.
Timo
> I start to suspect that I didn't implement the Material Law correctly and
> these effects are correlated.
>
> To be more clear I add my files.
>
> Can you give me some hint ab
Dear Lorenzo,
Dumux supports distributed memory parallelism with MPI. If an MPI
implementation like opemmpi is installed, Dune will automatically
find it. You can run your simulation in parallel, with the respective command
fitting your MPI implementation,
e.g.
mpirun -np 4 ./executable
Timo
the order in the fluid
system, the order of the equations will change as well.
Best wishes
Timo
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Regards,
> Ranjeet
> ___
> Dumux mailing list
> Dumux@listserv.uni-st
Hi Lorenzo,
it all depends on your setup. Probably something wrong with your custom
material law.
What have you tried so far to fix your issue?
Timo
> On 2. Nov 2018, at 11:53, lc wrote:
>
> Hello Dennis,
>
> thank you. I did as you suggested but as I do this, the New
if the coupling is weak.
There is a lot of literature on this topic. Please restrict questions on
the mailing list to Dumux-specific questions.
Best wishes,
Timo
Thanks a lot,
Lorenzo
On 02/11/2018 13:56, Timo Koch wrote:
Hi Lorenzo,
it all depends on your setup. Probably something wrong with your
for that. So it's two lines in total.
Viele Grüße,
Timo
> Am 03.09.2018 um 08:36 schrieb Nikolai Andrianov :
>
> Hi Dennis,
>
> Thanks for your feedback!
>
> Is there a method available to output the matrix to a text file so that the
> matrix structure can be further explored
2 cores? If yes can you post
some time measurements over the number of cores that we can look at? The
kuvette test has only 120 cells, that's too small of a grid to run it
efficiently on many cores. Did you try the same with more cells? Does
anything change?
Timo
Kind regards,
Lorenzo
> Am 21.12.2018 um 08:39 schrieb lc :
>
> Good morning,
>
> I have one general question:
>
> is it possible to run 1 dimensional test case, for example, buckely leverett?
>
yes.
Timo
> Kind regards,
>
> Lorenzo
>
>
>
>> On 19.12.2018 13
. The doxygen website should then be in
build-cmake/doc/doxygen/html/index.html.
Best wishes
Timo
> Am 11.12.2018 um 07:41 schrieb Ranjeet kumar :
>
> Hi,
> Does access to docs restricted to outside users? Earlier it was accessible.
>
>
Viele Grüße,
Timo
> Am 17.12.2018 um 07:44 schrieb lc :
>
> Good morning,
>
>
> I have a general question.
>
> What is the highest formal order of accuracy in space and time in DuMux? As I
> read, using central FV and Box model and FE and explicit/implicit Euler
Timo
___
Dumux mailing list
Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de
https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
t post
five C++ headers with your entire setup)
and describe them in detail in your question.
Furthermore, please do not use the Dumux mailing list to ask _general_
questions about porous media flow, mathematics, numerics, discretisation
methods, C++, etc. Please consult the respective liter
small, would be greatly appreciated.
The convergence problem could come from multiple things. Why do you expect the
boundary condition type of corner node to be the problem?
It could be also related to which value you actually set on the boundary, if it
fits your physical problem, time
will usually find it.
Try removing _all_ build directories (build-cmake)
and rerun dunecontrol. The terminal output of dunecontrol also tells you if
SuperLU was found or not.
You can also try using UMFPackBackend, in case you have UMFPack
installed, which is another direct solver backend.
Best wis
Hi Ranjeet,
it looks like UMFPack wasn't found by Dune. Can you remove the
build-directories, rerun dunecontrol and post the output in the attachment?
Best wishes,
Timo
On 29.11.18 16:09, Ranjeet kumar wrote:
Hi, I am getting an error message "error: ‘UMFPackBackend’ does not
name a
HiNikolai,
any reason you are not using the Dumux classes for reading vtu (the VtkReader)?
Timo
> Am 04.12.2018 um 22:18 schrieb Christoph Grüninger :
>
> Hi Nikolai,
> that's almost pure CMake: You have to set CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS with
> your flags. Add "-DCMAKE_EXE_LINK
.
- Release candidate packages will be provided.
- Tests on the various systems, compilers, with different settings are run.
== DuMuX 3.0 release: 21st Dec 2018 ==
Thanks for sticking to the plan. Looking forward to a good release.
Timo
Hi Felix,
how did you verify this? We would need some more information to see what the
issue is. You get a position inside the gravity member function so if you use
that to determine your gravity vector it should also use these different
gravity vectors...
Timo
> Am 07.01.2019 um 10
]*10; // some function
return gravity;
}
i.e. return by value instead of return by reference, and create a temporary
gravity vector inside the function.
Avoid mutable in general. It has only some very special used cases, i.e.
internal caching.
Best wishes
Timo
> Am 13.01.2019 um 08:57
. Other than that
nothing special has to be done.
Best wishes
Timo
> Am 13.01.2019 um 17:46 schrieb Elena Shaporenko :
>
> Hello All!
> I have the question about periodic boundary conditions. Is it possible to
> implement this in implicit models?
> Be
Hi Tsinober,
you seem to have a mixup of different versions. Did you checkout the
releases/3.0 branch in _both_ the dumux and the dumux-course module?
Best wishes
Timo
Original question (30th Dec 2018):
Hi there
I'm having some trouble in running the exercises located within
to the error!
Best wishes
Timo
On 02.01.19 15:38, Timo Koch wrote:
Hi Tsinober,
you seem to have a mixup of different versions. Did you checkout the
releases/3.0 branch in _both_ the dumux and the dumux-course module?
Best wishes
Timo
Original question (30th Dec 2018):
Hi there
I'm
, and report any problems that you encounter. The
final release of 3.0.0 will likely happen by the end of the week if no major
problems are reported.
Pleas note that DuMux 3.0.0 is a major version update.
Backwards-compatibility with 2.12 could not be maintained.
Timo
Hi Lorenzo,
does it get better if you lower the CFL factor?
Timo
On 19.12.18 11:10, lc wrote:
Hello,
I observed an unexpected behaviour for which I'd like to ask your
help. In the attached figure you can see a snapshot of the solution.
In both the contour and in the line chart you may
have finger effects close to the
boundary? That would explain why the profile in the first cell looks
like it does.
Best wishes
Timo
On 27.03.19 14:24, lc wrote:
Hello Dumux team,
We are, finally, in the post-processing phase, aiming at publishing
soon ... but we observed a scaring issue
the trick. Your initial conditions
produces extremely large pressure gradients in y-direction, too.
I'm not convinced that this is an issue with Dumux.
Best wishes
Timo
On 27.03.19 14:53, lc wrote:
Hello Timo,
I enclose 2 solutions, t = 0 and t = 600 days.
Indeed, I have a saturation
experience with
simulations at that size.
Cheers,
Timo
But if I would reduce the resolution by a factor 2, i.e. app. 43
megavoxels (300 vx diameter and 450 height), this would put me on the
safe side?
Cheers and thanks,
/John
*From:* Flemisch, Bernd
*Sent:* Thursday, April 4, 2019 8:59 AM
Hi Georg,
instead of precompiled headers you could give ccache a try. It caches
compilation steps so you will only recompile stuff that actually changed. This
might also speed up the compilation of the rest of the program.
If you decide to do it I would be interested in the results ;)
Timo
On 29.03.19 13:46, lc wrote:
Hello Timo,
Does it also occur when your grid is fine from the beginning and you
don't have hanging nodes?
Yes, I tried different variants, strctured, adapted, unstructured and
the behaviour is the same.
What are your criterions for Newton convergence
Hi Samuel,
as an addition to Bernd's answer, you might have to set
DUNE_GRID_EXPERIMENTAL_GRID_EXTENSIONS:BOOL=TRUE
for compiling dune-grid and the grid modules. I'm not sure if this is
still required.
Best wishes
Timo
On 08.04.19 17:37, Flemisch, Bernd wrote:
Hi Samuel,
I think
Hi Edscott,
I’m assuming you use version 2.12. Can you be more specific? What are these
boundary condition? Why wouldn’t it be possible to solve it with the el2p model?
What does it mean “Newton does not converge on the first step”?
Timo
> Am 22.02.2019 um 20:57 schrieb Ed Scott Wilson Gar
Hi Edscott,
Martin Beck implemented exactly that in his PhD thesis in Dumux 2.12 and the
code should be somewhere (check dumux-pub) or ask Martin.
Also this should be much easier to do in Dumux 3.0, as the structure was
developed with something like sequential coupling in mind.
Timo
>
that changes there is unfortunately no detailed
guide. But there are plenty of existing model implementations and tests
as examples for what the new way looks like.
Timo
On 14.03.19 17:42, Ed Scott Wilson Garcia wrote:
Hi,
I've currently got some programs that run on a dumux-3.0
Hi Edscott,
just as an addition: modifying the porosity-model (storage term) is a
lot easier in Dumux 3.0.
You simply have to change the porosity law in the spatialparams.
Cheers
Timo
On 11.03.19 11:09, Martin Beck wrote:
Hi Edscott,
yes, the model assumes alpha = 1. If you want to adapt
Please try that one in parallel.
Timo
On 06.02.19 11:58, lc wrote:
Hello,
I'm still fighting to fix the parallel execution.
Now, I re-install mpich/openmpi and configured Dumux 2.12 (and also
3.0.0).
I'm running: porousmediumflow/2p/sequential/test_impes testcase with 1
and 4 core which should be
Hi Gion,
it looks like "loadBalance()" was never called in the corner point grid
manager. This should be fixed now on master and release/3.0.
Can you check and verify (do a git pull origin releases/3.0, or git pull
origin master if you are on master)?
Best wishes
Timo
On 0
nt it in a different way in 2.12? Maybe you can reformulate
your question?
Timo
best regards,
Edscott
I
--
Dr. Edscott Wilson Garcia
Reservoir Engineering
Mexican
Hi Lorenzo,
you can't scale well to 4 cores because your CPU only has two cores. The
two additional ones are only hyperthreads. Please repeat the same
numerical experiment on a machine with more cores.
Timo
On 24.01.19 10:37, lc wrote:
On 18.01.2019 21:52, Flemisch, Bernd wrote:
Can you
Hi Ranjeet,
please use a debugging tool like valgrind to find where your segmentation fault
comes from. Maybe then we can help.
Timo
> Am 24.01.2019 um 08:08 schrieb Ranjeet kumar :
>
> Hi All,
> I want to add stresses value to the vtu file for the el2p problem. Based on
&g
in the problem.neumann() function for the oil balance
Timo
> On 1. Feb 2019, at 09:50, lc wrote:
>
> Good morning,
>
> but so, how can I impose the flux of the non-wetting phase (oil) to be
> constant, dsn/dn = 0, at the right boundary?
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Lorenzo
>
&
that takes a lot of unnecessary resources. If your using
releases of dune and dumux you can even prebuild everything in the
image, then you just need to reconfigure your module.
Good luck,
Timo
On 29.01.19 19:05, Nikolai Andrianov wrote:
Dear DuMuX experts,
How can I set up automated tes
the problem's neumann() function.
In order to answer your question for 2p you have to be more specific.
Which discretization scheme are you using? Which element types? For
which equations to you want to set Outflow in the 2p model? What other
BCs do you set? What do you expect? What do you get?
Timo
surfactant. That seems feasible, I can't remember right now if I know
someone that tried that already. There might be other people that can
answer that better. Reactions in general should not be a problem.
Timo
On 04.02.19 17:02, lc wrote:
Good evening,
I'd like to ask about the chemical
Jacobians are currently only implemented
for the incompressible 1p and 2p model. To use it, the corresponding
local residual class that implements the derivative has to be set for
the LocalResidual property.
Best wishes
Timo
Kind regards
Bernd
Viele Grüße,
Timo
> Am 10.06.2019 um 10:54 schrieb lc :
>
> Good morning,
>
> I'd like to ask whether it would be possible to simulate a typical quarter
> five spot problem?
>
Hi Lorenzo,
yes of course it’s possible.
> How is it managed such configuration
for reporting this issue
Timo
> On 5. Jul 2019, at 10:11, Martin Schneider
> wrote:
>
> Dear Joan,
>
> I think you can ignore it. It tells you that the phase state might not be set
> for
> the PrimaryVariable in the evalSolution function.
>
> However, after havin
I wanted to say should “not” have any effect on your simulation.
> On 5. Jul 2019, at 10:39, Timo Koch wrote:
>
> Dear Joan,
>
> It should have any effect on your simulation. However it would be nice to not
> get a compiler warning.
> Would you please try to r
the different grid managers in Dune. They have slightly different meanings.
Best wishes
Timo
> Am 09.04.2019 um 14:53 schrieb Samuel Scherrer :
>
> Hi Timo,
>
> I ran
>
> find . -wholename '*/build-cmake/*' -delete
>
> inside the directory where all my dune modules are bef
Hi Samuel,
did you delete the build folders before you reran dunecontrol?
Also you can just leave out the whole line with
DUNE_GRID_EXPERIMENTAL_GRID_EXTENSIONS
because the default should be false.
Timo
On 09.04.19 11:49, Samuel Scherrer wrote:
Hi Bernd,
Yes, I set
You can‘t know if it‘s a dgf file. It could be in any custom group in the input
file, or not specified in the input file at all.
Timo
Viele Grüße,
Timo
> Am 10.04.2019 um 19:08 schrieb Flemisch, Bernd
> :
>
> Would the best default be that it uses boundaryId if this
Hi Samuel,
you can't just redefine the macro because it's already defined somewhere
in Dune, that's what the error means.
You need to reconfigure the dune libraries with the the new setting in
the opts file.
Timo
On 09.04.19 10:49, Samuel Scherrer wrote:
Hi Bernd,
I had trouble
Am 16.07.2019 um 10:24 schrieb lc
mailto:lorenzo.camp...@uniroma1.it>>:
Hello
On 16.07.2019 10:22, Timo Koch wrote:
please post a minimal working example to reproduce the behaviour. Also, we need
to know what you are computing, what is the outcome, what is the expected
outcome and w
I'm afraid the old sequential
schemes don't get very much attention right now from the core developers.
Sorry I couldn't help more, open-source research software is always a
work in progress,
Timo
On 15.07.19 13:15, lc wrote:
Hello,
can you explain how can I strongly impose the Diriche
/dumux
--
___
Timo Koch phone: +49 711 685 64676
IWS, Universität Stuttgart fax: +49 711 685 60430
Pfaffenwaldring 61email: timo.k...@iws.uni-stuttgart.de
D-70569 Stuttgarturl: www.hydrosys.uni-stuttg
-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/issues
<https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/issues>).
I currently don’t have time to look at it, but maybe some other developer?
Best wishes,
Timo
> On 17. Aug 2019, at 12:25, Lars Kaiser wrote:
>
> Dear Dumux users,
>
1 - 100 of 234 matches
Mail list logo
