Question #677428 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/677428
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 10.01.2019 23:32, trevj wrote:
> Question #677428 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #677223 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/677223
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 12/29/2018 10:17 PM, hanzomon4 wrote:
> New question #677223 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/
Question #670362 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/670362
edso proposed the following answer:
On 01.03.2019 14:17, Peter Unthahorsten wrote:
> Question #670362 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/670362
>
Review: Needs Fixing
hey Brandon,
opened a merge request so the branch becomes commentable. looks good to me.
what it's lacking is the documentation of the parameter in the manpage
'bin/duplicity.1' though.
..ede/duply.net
--
On 11.03.2019 19:26, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> Review: Needs Fixing
>
> Looks like you're trying to merge 0.7 into 0.8.
>
> lp:duplicity is 0.8
> lp:duplicity/0.7-series is 0.7
>
@Ken, maybe its easier you remove the paragraph in the man page by hand.
edso has proposed merging lp:~brandon753-ba/duplicity/aws-glacier into
lp:duplicity.
Commit message:
Adds support for for a command line option to store data on AWS S3 Glacier.
Requested reviews:
edso (ed.so)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~brandon753-ba/duplicity/aws
Review: Approve
> Hey Edso,
>
> I just pushed a commit adding documentation to the new feature. Let me know
> if you need anything else or if I need to do anything different on my end as
> I have never used bzr or launchpad before only git and svn.
so far no.
>Also I
Question #678515 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/678515
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
maybe some key confusion like explained here
https://github.com/duplicati/duplicati/issues/3366
?
..ede/duply.net
On 13.02.2019
Review: Needs Fixing
Ken,
this lacks man page documentation! ..ede
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~vam9/duplicity/0.8-series-s3-kms-support/+merge/362000
Your team duplicity-team is subscribed to branch lp:duplicity.
___
Mailing list:
hi Matthew,
why not take the more unobstructive path and cache the result in
file_naming.parse ? this way, no of the surrounding code must be altered and
_instantly_ all calls would profit from the optimization.
of course this way more memory will be used depending on the number of cached
file
Question #682795 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/682795
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
looks like not implemented so far
https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/1731661
..ede/duply.net
--
You received this quest
Question #682795 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/682795
Linked to bug: #1731661
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1731661
"Google Team Drive Support"
--
You received this question notification because your team duplicity-team
is an answer
Question #681867 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/681867
edso posted a new comment:
as far as i can see your cmd line matches the parameters used by
duplicity as well as the duply frontend. while checking i saw tat duply
tests if te given secret is available
Question #681867 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/681867
edso posted a new comment:
duplicity is merely using the gpg command line binary.
would you mind to test what gpg does when given a non existent key?
..ede/duply.net
--
You received this question
> Testing a live backup against S3, I don't see any difference in list returning
> strings or byte strings. The only difference I've seen is in the manual test.
that's because in live duplicity the backend are wrapped in BackendWrapper
class. see comment
Review: Needs Fixing
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~carlalex/duplicity/duplicity/+merge/376206
Your team duplicity-team is subscribed to branch lp:duplicity.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team
Post to :
On 03.12.2019 05:06, carlalex wrote:
>> Looks like manual.backendtest is way out of date. I think this needs to be
>> moved to functional tests and incorporated into tox testing.
>
> Where does that leave the merge request? What else should be done?
>
assuming you tested with a live duplicity as
On 04.12.2019 16:49, Carl A. Adams wrote:
>>> I had added register_backend to s3_boto3_backend, keeping it self contained
>>> and following the convention in the ssh backends. The backends do not seem
>>> entirely consistent on this point, with ssh having the two flavors entirely
>>> self
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~carlalex/duplicity/duplicity/+merge/376206
Your team duplicity-team is subscribed to branch lp:duplicity.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team
Post to :
Review: Needs Information
looks good! and man page is adapted as well. i like it.
there's just one issue that i'd like to change. switching actual backend via
--parameter is deprecated since we adopted the stacked scheme. you can check
eg.
ssh_paramiko_backend.py
ssh_pexpect_backend.py
for
ity requires bytes. I have not used the
> manual backend test in a while, so it may be out of date.
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 8:21 AM edso wrote:
>
>> hey Ken,
>>
>> i see that for other backends this is done automagically in
>>
>> https://bazaar.launc
> On the minus, I would think it someday should become the default for s3. But,
> implementing a non-default boto3+s3 now doesn't preclude changing the
> defaults in the future. I expect boto will die completely some day.
that's the beauty of switching backends via scheme. moving the default
hey Ken,
i see that for other backends this is done automagically in
https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~duplicity-team/duplicity/0.8-series/view/head:/duplicity/backend.py#L562
can any of you see a reason why it is not for the boto3 backend?.. ede
On 02.12.2019 15:12, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> Yes,
Question #684761 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/684761
edso requested more information:
Ken,
we should probably still strive to close the file instances. after all
these are the underlying issue why we need so high ulimit values. do you
agree?
..ede
Question #684761 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/684761
edso posted a new comment:
seems to be dependend on hwo python was compiled according to
https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/issues/477
it also says using `python -Wall` will make
Question #684523 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/684523
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
hey Ash,
looks like your problems lies with using venv . either do not use it or
find out why loading native libraries might f
Question #687232 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/687232
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 18.12.2019 16:52, Robert Inder wrote:
> Question #687232 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/
Question #687232 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/687232
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 18.12.2019 12:52, Robert Inder wrote:
> New question #687232 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/
edso has proposed merging lp:~ed.so/duplicity/boto.fixup into lp:duplicity.
Commit message:
fix manpage indention
clarify difference between boto backends
add boto+s3:// for future use when boto3+s3:// will become default s3 backend
Requested reviews:
duplicity-team (duplicity-team)
For more
Question #687232 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/687232
edso proposed the following answer:
On 20.12.2019 17:22, Robert Inder wrote:
> Question #687232 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/687232
>
> Robert
Question #689178 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/689178
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
a quick websearch reveals
https://github.com/s3tools/s3cmd/issues/1005
and
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54717862/how-d
Question #689862 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/689862
edso posted a new comment:
a little off topic here, as your question is generally
"What is the advantage of asymmetric encrytion over symmetric using
gnupg?"
so everything answering tha
Question #689493 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/689493
edso posted a new comment:
hi Piotr,
duplicity 0.7 is not actively developed anymore. did you try duplicity
0.8 as suggested on stackex aleready?
..ede/duply.net
--
You received this question
Question #689590 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/689590
edso proposed the following answer:
check the Changelog link above. it just got added in 0.8 some weeks ago.
here are the latest install hints from 0.8.12 release announcement
-->
There are a
Question #689590 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/689590
edso proposed the following answer:
wrt. Changelog probably this
"
New in v0.8.12 (2020/03/19)
---
...
* Fixed bug #1769267 - [enhancement] please consider
using r
Question #689590 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/689590
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 30.03.2020 22:23, Pope Rigby wrote:
> New question #689590 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #689493 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/689493
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 26.03.2020 10:09, Piotr Slawek wrote:
> Question #689493 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/
Question #690245 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/690245
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 27.04.2020 15:05, Gaël Bréard wrote:
> New question #690245 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #690641 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/690641
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 11.05.2020 20:58, constantin wrote:
> New question #690641 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #690588 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/690588
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 10.05.2020 10:05, Michael Jenner wrote:
> New question #690588 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/
Question #691453 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/691453
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 22.06.2020 13:15, Lagoda wrote:
> New question #691453 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #691181 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/691181
edso proposed the following answer:
On 07.06.2020 22:15, Pope Rigby wrote:
> Question #691181 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/691181
>
> Pope
Question #691181 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/691181
edso proposed the following answer:
On 07.06.2020 21:55, Pope Rigby wrote:
> Question #691181 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/691181
>
> Pope
Question #695992 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/695992
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 3/11/2021 10:15, tim-ot wrote:
> New question #695992 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #695777 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/695777
edso posted a new comment:
hey Max,
any reason why you chose SCP over SFTP? i'm asking because the sftp is the more
versatile and stable of these two see (a Note on Ssh Backends / Why use sftp
Question #693039 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/693039
edso posted a new comment:
could the volume the folder
/home/potop/.cache/deja-dup/tmp/
is placed on be full by any chance?
what happens if you move TMP folder to somewhere else? dunno if deja-dup
Question #700316 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/700316
edso posted a new comment:
as i wrote
"
if there is an error repeat but set log verbosity to max. '-v9'
"
but it already tells you why it fails. is there a '/etc/ssh/ssh_config'
? if no
Question #693039 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/693039
edso posted a new comment:
two things to try still.
1. set up deja-dup to use a different TMP space
2. raise the duplicity verbosity to debug '-v9' , also no idea how to do that
in deja-dup
good
Question #700316 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/700316
edso posted a new comment:
> I have no idea how to set log verbosity to max. '-v9'
then find out!
look for "-v,--verbosity" on
https://duplicity.nongnu.org/vers8/duplicity.1.html
us
Question #700316 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/700316
edso posted a new comment:
so sftp:// is working for you now?
which one? or both (paramiko,pexpect)? ..ede
--
You received this question notification because your team duplicity-team
is an answer
Question #700316 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/700316
edso posted a new comment:
they seem to be using this and it seems not to be implemented to provide extra
args.
https://github.com/lafranceinsoumise/ansible-backup/blob/master/templates/conf.j2
Question #700316 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/700316
edso posted a new comment:
ssh key auth uses te same setup as ssh binaries on command line. if it
works there it should work with duplicity instantly.
if you need you can provide --ssh-options=&qu
Question #700316 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/700316
edso posted a new comment:
hey Tomek,
duplicity moved development over to
https://gitlab.com/duplicity/duplicity/-/issues . consider opening a
ticket there.
looks like an user error. two suggestions
501 - 553 of 553 matches
Mail list logo
