Re: [Duplicity-team] [Question #107216]: Public key encryption and incremental backups

Question #107216 on Duplicity changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/107216 Aaron Whitehouse posted a new comment: See updated information on this topic in this mailing list thread: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2015-03/msg00022.html -- You received

Re: [Duplicity-team] [Question #107216]: Public key encryption and incremental backups

Question #107216 on Duplicity changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/107216 edso posted a new comment: The advantage to this approach over my understanding of your approach (one host key, plus one admin key) is that, even if the hacker gets access to the cleartext

Re: [Duplicity-team] [Question #107216]: Public key encryption and incremental backups

Question #107216 on Duplicity changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/107216 edso posted a new comment: On smaller backup's I'd suggest going for fulls only, which never need a private key, except for verifying/restoring. this was meant of course for older duplicity

Re: [Duplicity-team] [Question #107216]: Public key encryption and incremental backups

Question #107216 on Duplicity changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/107216 Status: Open = Answered edso proposed the following answer: This was true until duplicity version 0.6.0 .. This version keeps the necessary metadata for incrementing backups in an archive/cache