Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
robegue posted a new comment:
errata: the second file is backends/ftpbackend.py
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
duplicity-team, which is an answer contact for
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
Jamie Lokier posted a new comment:
Maverick's duplicity is still broken with this bug, and unfortunately
the Natty package won't run on Maverick (it depends on python 2.7 vs.
python 2.6). Any change
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
Linked to bug: #674506
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674506
AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute
'subprocess_popen_persist'
--
You received this question notification
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
edso proposed the following answer:
created a bug pointing here
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674506
ede/duply.net
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
as i wrote
this is caused by this change in 0.6.10
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~duplicity-team/duplicity/0.6-series/revision/665
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
edso posted a new comment:
i just commented
https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/631275
ede/duply.net
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
duplicity-team,
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
Paul Hassinger posted a new comment:
You said this is a bug? What bug number is that? I cannot find it or
follow it to see if patches get applied. Should I convert this to a bug?
I would gladly
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
Paul Hassinger posted a new comment:
I guess the other thing I'm not sure of is if
https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/631275 is even repaired in
0.6.10, even though it's just listed in 0.6.09
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
Status: Answered = Solved
Paul Hassinger confirmed that the question is solved:
As a temporary fix, though not to these issues, I took 0.6.08b and
applied the patches of just the items I needed
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
Status: Solved = Open
Paul Hassinger is still having a problem:
Didn't mean to close the question.
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
duplicity-team, which is
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
this is caused by this change in 0.6.10
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~duplicity-
team/duplicity/0.6-series/revision/665
it is a bug and
New question #130310 on Duplicity:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
I'm running Ubuntu 10.04/lucid 64 bit. When using duplicity, my command works
fine. I'm having issues with large files, so I see the latest version corrects
some off those issues.
I've tried using
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
Paul Hassinger gave more information on the question:
Just to be more specific, duplicity works with the command I supplied
with the ubuntu repositories (Duplicity 0.6.08b)
The command fails when I
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
Paul Hassinger gave more information on the question:
The same issue also occurs when I install 0.6.10 from source.
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
Paul Hassinger gave more information on the question:
For more info, I also tried installing from source 0.6.09 and 0.6.08 and
had the same issue with both.
I then installed using the Ubuntu 10.04
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
Paul Hassinger gave more information on the question:
actually, 0.6.08 was before 0.6.08b, so invalid command line arguments
don't make sense either.
--
You received this question notification
16 matches
Mail list logo