Question #107216 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/107216
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
This was true until duplicity version 0.6.0 .. This version keeps the
necessary metadata for incrementing backups in an archive/cache
Question #109951 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/109951
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
duplicity is logging errors to STDERR .. hence using
#duplicity my_options source target logfile 21
will do what you want.
learn more
Question #107216 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/107216
edso posted a new comment:
On smaller backup's I'd suggest going for fulls only, which never need a
private key, except for verifying/restoring.
this was meant of course for older duplicity versions
Question #107216 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/107216
edso posted a new comment:
The advantage to this approach over my understanding of your approach
(one host key, plus one admin key) is that, even if the hacker gets
access to the cleartext
Question #115570 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/115570
edso posted a new comment:
You might want to try asking gpg to use another compressor e.g.
--compress-algo=bzip2 --bzip2-compress-level=9
..ede
On 05.07.2010 09:19, Rodrigo Alvarez wrote:
Question
Question #116587 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/116587
edso proposed the following answer:
Works for me .. We should document this more clearly in the man page.
Something like
Verify is done by comparing the archive contents with the stored signatures
Question #118297 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/118297
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
This came up before. Check
https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/579958
Check if the patched version is already released and use
Question #123555 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/123555
edso posted a new comment:
your welcome, ede
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
duplicity-team, which is an answer contact for Duplicity
Question #128051 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/128051
edso posted a new comment:
DId you try using duplicity directly on the command prompt? Does that
work?
Also. Do you have boto installed?
Eventually. Run duplicity with the verbose switch -v9 from
Question #128051 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/128051
edso posted a new comment:
It says pretty clearly
UnsupportedBackendScheme
which means that duplicity does not know what to do with 's3+http' in
your case, but it should. Scheme is another name
Question #126356 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/126356
edso posted a new comment:
Verify only verifies the content of your backup. So, yes you are safe
with your assumptions.
Also understand that veriy verifies your backup but not compares
Question #126356 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/126356
Status: Expired = Open
edso changed the question status:
reopen
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
duplicity-team, which is an answer contact for Duplicity
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
this is caused by this change in 0.6.10
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~duplicity-
team/duplicity/0.6-series/revision/665
it is a bug
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
as i wrote
this is caused by this change in 0.6.10
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~duplicity-team/duplicity/0.6-series/revision/665
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
edso posted a new comment:
i just commented
https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/631275
ede/duply.net
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
duplicity-team
Question #131914 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/131914
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
Not at the moment. If you really want it, you can patch the source and
add a parameter switch.
..ede/duply.net
On 31.10.2010 03:19
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
Linked to bug: #674506
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674506
AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute
'subprocess_popen_persist'
--
You received this question notification
Question #130310 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/130310
edso proposed the following answer:
created a bug pointing here
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674506
ede/duply.net
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
duplicity
Question #133863 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/133863
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 13.11.2010 13:26, Patrick Allemann wrote:
Question #133863 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question
Question #136099 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/136099
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
Check the man page
http://duplicity.nongnu.org/duplicity.1.html
especially the chapters URL Format. Use the env vars AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID
Question #139985 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/139985
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
As duplicity does not know how many files it is going to create, there
is no elegant solution for this. We could introduce a switch
Question #140813 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/140813
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
again, because this is important. you will always need a secret key to encrypt
to so duplicity can refresh your archive dir when
Question #141176 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/141176
edso proposed the following answer:
On 26.01.2011 20:01, vergueishon wrote:
Question #141176 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/141176
vergueishon posted a new
Question #143932 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/143932
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
Your using the wrong application ;). Duplicity's source has to a be
local filessystem, remote sources are not supported. You might
Question #143932 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/143932
edso posted a new comment:
On 03.02.2011 23:17, Carlos Franke wrote:
Question #143932 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/143932
Status: Answered = Solved
Question #148376 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/148376
edso posted a new comment:
which duplicity version? could you run it in maximum verbosity (-v9) and
attach the output?
could it be that absolute paths are not supported? the manpage does not
mention
Question #150801 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/150801
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
wait for the bugfix from ken and try it. my bet is even though you think
it is a US Basket it ended up in Europe. any reason not to use
Question #150909 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/150909
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 29.03.2011 17:14, ceg wrote:
New question #150909 on Duplicity:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/150909
Could
Question #150909 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/150909
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 30.03.2011 10:08, ceg wrote:
Question #150909 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/150909
Question #152503 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/152503
edso proposed the following answer:
actually duplicity generates a volume, uploads it, and then generates
the next, uploads it and so on .. ede/duply
--
You received this question notification
edso has proposed merging lp:~ed.so/duplicity/encr-sign-key2 into lp:duplicity.
Requested reviews:
duplicity-team (duplicity-team)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ed.so/duplicity/encr-sign-key2/+merge/68160
as discussed on the mailinglist
a check if encryption and signing
Question #163116 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/163116
edso posted a new comment:
Eventually I ran a verification to a date prior to the corrupted
manifest, the one with the missmatched hash, and voila! Verification
completed and then a restore
Question #163116 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/163116
edso posted a new comment:
a patch that makes the mismatch output more verbose is here
https://code.launchpad.net/~ed.so/duplicity/numowner+hashverbose
output is now:
Invalid data - SHA1 hash mismatch
edso has proposed merging lp:~ed.so/duplicity/numowner+hashverbose into
lp:duplicity.
Requested reviews:
duplicity-team (duplicity-team)
Related bugs:
Bug #524922 in Duplicity: duplicity does not have numeric uid/gid support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/524922
For more
On 23.08.2011 20:25, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
The size info is the problem. Each backend returns a list of filenames, but
getting size info is problematic. That's going to be a major piece of work
to get that info.
I am no pythonist per se, but is there a possibility to add a list_extended to
On 23.08.2011 21:02, Michael Terry wrote:
true but backends usually list all files anyway. dont they? .. ede
They do if you ask them to, and that's the only listing capability the
current Duplicity backend.py API has.
But if we're talking about adding to that API, I suspect most backends
On 23.08.2011 22:49, Michael Terry wrote:
this is a mapped list, right?
I'm not familiar with that term, but were you asking what I meant by
dictionary? I meant a python dictionary, like:
a = {'key': 'value'}
a['key'] == 'value'
i am no pythonist, so yes a key-value list is called a
in this case it means we add a new interface like get_info() that backends
are free to implement.
if they do, some extra duplicity functionality kicks in. if not, then it
does not ;).
But no reason to invent some complicated thing that all backends have to
support. Why not do
On 24.08.2011 16:12, Michael Terry wrote:
I feel like the importance of the details of the API design, while not a
trivial matter, has still been dwarfed by the amount of virtual ink we've
spilled. :)
that's the nice thing of going paperless ;)
you might have noticed, i try to model future
On 24.08.2011 16:31, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
I think you two have indeed hashed the design down to it's essentials, so
here are some thoughts on the issue.
The idea of get_info(filename_list) is a good idea, but it is not necessary
to specify what info to return. It is necessary for this
On 06.09.2011 20:59, Ross Williams wrote:
Ross Williams has proposed merging
lp:~ross-ross-williams/duplicity/gpg-agent-fix into lp:duplicity.
Requested reviews:
duplicity-team (duplicity-team)
Related bugs:
Bug #842990 in Duplicity: use-agent doesn't work with gpg2
Question #170395 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/170395
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 07.09.2011 10:15, Dan Drake wrote:
New question #170395 on Duplicity:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/170395
Question #170480 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/170480
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 07.09.2011 22:10, Chris Stankaitis wrote:
New question #170480 on Duplicity:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question
Question #171720 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/171720
edso posted a new comment:
On 20.09.2011 04:20, Dan Drake wrote:
New question #171720 on Duplicity:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/171720
Sometimes when I do an incremental
Question #173420 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/173420
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
seems like
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~duplicity-team/duplicity/0.6-series/view/head:/duplicity/backends/webdavbackend.py
would have
edso has proposed merging lp:~ed.so/duplicity/manpage into lp:duplicity.
Requested reviews:
duplicity-team (duplicity-team)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ed.so/duplicity/manpage/+merge/78609
some updates to the manpage
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~ed.so/duplicity
On 07.10.2011 17:41, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
Thanks ede! This update was very much needed.
you mean the logging explained, right? ..ede
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~ed.so/duplicity/manpage/+merge/78609
Your team duplicity-team is requested to review the proposed merge of
edso has proposed merging lp:~ed.so/duplicity/UnicodeDecodeError into
lp:duplicity.
Requested reviews:
duplicity-team (duplicity-team)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ed.so/duplicity/UnicodeDecodeError/+merge/78840
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~ed.so/duplicity
Question #173724 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/173724
edso posted a new comment:
On 23.10.2011 15:10, ubuaverill wrote:
Question #173724 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/173724
Status: Answered = Solved
Bug #872140 status changed in Duplicity:
New = Invalid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/872140
Unable to restore file
This bug is linked to #173724.
file not found in archive from full backup
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/173724
--
You received this question
Question #173724 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/173724
edso posted a new comment:
On 27.10.2011 13:41, ubuaverill wrote:
Question #173724 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/173724
ubuaverill posted a new comment
Question #177283 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/177283
edso proposed the following answer:
unfortunately it seems i can't convert the question into a bug, so
please use the related bug above to post your output.
thanks ede/duply.net
--
You received
Question #174942 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/174942
edso posted a new comment:
please read
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.duplicity.general/3743
generally there should be _no_ hash problem. you are free to move the
full duplicity
Question #175163 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/175163
Status: Expired = Answered
edso changed the question status:
added answer
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
duplicity-team, which is an answer contact
Question #175163 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/175163
edso proposed the following answer:
btw. there is also a machine readable log descriptor similar to what gpg
has, in case you are interested in such .. ede
--
You received this question notification
Question #175163 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/175163
edso posted a new comment:
During a backup or restore operation, what diagnostics are provided by
Duplicity? Do the diagnostics go to stderr?
errors yes, notification and such go to STDOUT
Question #180308 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/180308
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 28.11.2011 21:30, Florian Brucker wrote:
New question #180308 on Duplicity:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question
Question #181785 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/181785
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 13.12.2011 17:45, Chris Stankaitis wrote:
New question #181785 on Duplicity:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question
Question #182479 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/182479
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 20.12.2011 17:45, Chris Stankaitis wrote:
Question #182479 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question
Question #182479 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/182479
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 22.12.2011 20:00, Chris Stankaitis wrote:
Question #182479 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question
Question #183711 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/183711
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 06.01.2012 09:05, Douglas Choma wrote:
Question #183711 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question
Question #183711 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/183711
edso posted a new comment:
douglas, chris,
could you please try to run a test backup in debug verbosity using
PASSPHRASE e.g.
PASSPHRASE=secret duplicity -v9 ~/testfolder file:///tmp/testbkp
Question #185583 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/185583
edso posted a new comment:
On 24.01.2012 09:15, Jan Niggemann wrote:
Question #185583 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/185583
Status: Open = Solved
Question #187955 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/187955
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 16.02.2012 17:41, Gabriel A. Zorrilla wrote:
New question #187955 on Duplicity:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question
Question #187436 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/187436
edso posted a new comment:
On 29.02.2012 10:01, Launchpad Janitor wrote:
Question #187436 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/187436
Status: Open = Expired
Question #189204 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/189204
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 29.02.2012 14:41, Anton wrote:
New question #189204 on Duplicity:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/189204
I've
Question #189204 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/189204
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 29.02.2012 22:20, Anton wrote:
Question #189204 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/189204
Question #189204 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/189204
edso posted a new comment:
On 06.03.2012 14:20, Anton wrote:
Question #189204 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/189204
Status: Answered = Solved
Anton
Question #189204 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/189204
edso posted a new comment:
On 06.03.2012 14:31, edso wrote:
Question #189204 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/189204
edso posted a new comment
Question #189204 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/189204
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 06.03.2012 15:11, Anton wrote:
Question #189204 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/189204
edso has proposed merging lp:~ed.so/duplicity/0.6-manpage into lp:duplicity.
Requested reviews:
duplicity-team (duplicity-team)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ed.so/duplicity/0.6-manpage/+merge/96569
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~ed.so/duplicity/0.6-manpage/+merge/96569
Question #190424 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/190424
edso posted a new comment:
On 12.03.2012 15:11, Richard wrote:
Question #190424 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/190424
Description changed to:
I tried
edso has proposed merging lp:~ed.so/duplicity/0.6-ssh_add_missinghostkey into
lp:duplicity.
Requested reviews:
duplicity-team (duplicity-team)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ed.so/duplicity/0.6-ssh_add_missinghostkey/+merge/97085
add missing_host_key prompt to new
Question #190424 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/190424
edso posted a new comment:
On 12.03.2012 18:05, Richard wrote:
Question #190424 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/190424
Richard posted a new comment:
I
Question #190850 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/190850
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 16.03.2012 15:10, Justin Witrick wrote:
New question #190850 on Duplicity:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/190850
Question #190850 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/190850
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 16.03.2012 18:15, Justin Witrick wrote:
AssertionError: ('S_and_S_wedding', 'Wedding', '_DSC3751.NEF')
it claims there is a file
Question #190850 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/190850
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 16.03.2012 19:05, Justin Witrick wrote:
Question #190850 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question
Question #192331 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/192331
edso proposed the following answer:
just checked with 0.6.18 and python 2.6 'remove-older-than 1Y' works
fine for me.
ede/duply.net
--
You received this question notification because you
Question #192331 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/192331
edso proposed the following answer:
On 02.04.2012 11:05, edso wrote:
Question #192331 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/192331
edso proposed the following
Question #192331 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/192331
edso posted a new comment:
python3 will probably not help you as duplicity has not been adapted to
so far.
no i don't use other options.
setcurtime is executed in several places but most importantly
Question #192331 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/192331
edso posted a new comment:
checked with python 2.6.5 .. works as expected. commandline generated
form duply is
TMPDIR='/tmp' PASSPHRASE=pass FTP_PASSWORD=pass duplicity remove-older-
than 1Y --name
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 16.04.2012 21:30, Chris Stankaitis wrote:
New question #193846 on Duplicity:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
edso proposed the following answer:
On 17.04.2012 17:00, Chris Stankaitis wrote:
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
Chris Stankaitis
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
edso proposed the following answer:
On 20.04.2012 11:15, Kai-Alexander Ude wrote:
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
Kai-Alexander Ude
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
edso proposed the following answer:
On 20.04.2012 15:20, Chris Stankaitis wrote:
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
Chris Stankaitis
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
edso proposed the following answer:
On 22.04.2012 22:30, Kai-Alexander Ude wrote:
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
Kai-Alexander Ude
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
edso proposed the following answer:
On 23.04.2012 15:50, Kai-Alexander Ude wrote:
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
Kai-Alexander Ude
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
edso proposed the following answer:
On 23.04.2012 17:05, Kai-Alexander Ude wrote:
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
Kai-Alexander Ude
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
edso proposed the following answer:
On 23.04.2012 22:30, Kai-Alexander Ude wrote:
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
Kai-Alexander Ude
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
edso proposed the following answer:
On 04.05.2012 11:20, Kai-Alexander Ude wrote:
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
Kai-Alexander Ude
Question #196423 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/196423
Status: Open = Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 08.05.2012 05:10, Scott wrote:
Edit 3: Sorry about all the edits! Well trying it on a local drive
(file:// protocol) seems
Question #196423 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/196423
edso proposed the following answer:
ok,
i see that the new ssh backend has not retrying implemented. we have to
fix that.
also, i am starting to assume that the paramiko ssh backend reuses the
same
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
edso posted a new comment:
try to single out what the issue is..
usually it is the upload. run your backups with raised verbosity so you can see
how long it takes to build the diff volumes.
why did
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
edso proposed the following answer:
On 11.05.2012 20:45, Kai-Alexander Ude wrote:
Question #193846 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/193846
Status: Open
edso has proposed merging lp:~ed.so/duplicity/ssh-fixes into lp:duplicity.
Requested reviews:
duplicity-team (duplicity-team)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ed.so/duplicity/ssh-fixes/+merge/105803
- ssh paramiko backend respects --num-retries now
- set retry delay for ssh
edso has proposed merging lp:~ed.so/duplicity/backend_fixes into lp:duplicity.
Requested reviews:
duplicity-team (duplicity-team)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ed.so/duplicity/backend_fixes/+merge/105956
- fixed ssh/gio backend import warnings
+ ssh paramiko backend
On 08.06.2012 13:33, Eugene Crosser wrote:
Right now, duplicity (0.6.19) insists on asking the password if it was
not specified in the URL or FTP_PASSWORD environment variable, even if
lftp (which I use) is happy with the data present in .netrc.
can't you just simply set an empty password?
On 08.06.2012 14:45, Eugene Crosser wrote:
No, if it's empty duplicity will prompt for it. Which is exactly the
problem that needs fixing.
actually this would need a different bug report as it is not covered by
duplicity shows sensitive data in process listing
also i am not sure this is
Question #204219 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/204219
edso posted a new comment:
you should try to circle in the issue.
do a backup a small test set (one folder some small files)
try A:
same settings but file:// backend to exclude s3 backend as faulty
Question #183711 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/183711
edso posted a new comment:
hey brock,
thanks for the contribution. your approach looks healthy to me. i
forwarded it to mterry, who implemented validate_encryption_settings,
for validation
1 - 100 of 554 matches
Mail list logo
