On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 05:55:32PM +, Robinson, Paul wrote:
> > Both DWARF v4 and v5 say "The value 0 indicates that no source file
> > has been specified." I assumed that was deliberate, but maybe it was
> > an oversight. But given that both versions say the same I would avoid
> > using zero
Mike Eager suggested adding the link right after the libdwarf link
on the main page.
Should happen shortly.
DavidA
___
Dwarf-Discuss mailing list
Dwarf-Discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org
http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org
The Gardener is a group of ALPA loyal pilots who have taken on the
responsibility of protecting the profession from ALPA leadership that has gone
astray. Years ago the group protected the pilots as an extended hand of the
MEC, but unfortunately since we've had a member of our pilot group
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 04:27:16PM +, Robinson, Paul wrote:
> > > Yes. Please do publish the document somewhere. It would be interesting
> > > to know exactly what is being said to be inconsistent. As far as I
> > > know the issue of the file index defaulting to one and not having a
> > >
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 04:27:16PM +, Robinson, Paul wrote:
> > Yes. Please do publish the document somewhere. It would be interesting
> > to know exactly what is being said to be inconsistent. As far as I
> > know the issue of the file index defaulting to one and not having a
> > way to refer
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:46:55AM -0400, Eric Christopher via Dwarf-
> Discuss wrote:
> > "This margin is too narrow to contain..." ;)
> >
> > I'd like to see the doc - it's easy to believe we've gotten something
> wrong
> > here.. Might be good to fix this as textual edits rather than waiting
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:46:55AM -0400, Eric Christopher via Dwarf-Discuss
wrote:
> "This margin is too narrow to contain..." ;)
>
> I'd like to see the doc - it's easy to believe we've gotten something wrong
> here.. Might be good to fix this as textual edits rather than waiting on a
>
"This margin is too narrow to contain..." ;)
I'd like to see the doc - it's easy to believe we've gotten something wrong
here.. Might be good to fix this as textual edits rather than waiting on a
full dwarf standard release because we're going to run into this a lot if
we can't get it sorted
I think the following (while not news) needs to be said
simply and directly.
It is impossible to obey all the DWARF5 rules
on file numbering in the line table
at the same time. They contradict each other,
taking the standard as a whole.
[this consistency issue is solely DWARF5].
A simple
