Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] DWP mixed (DWARFv4/pre-standard + DWARFv5) content

On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 23:13, David Blaikie wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 1:05 AM Pavel Labath wrote: >> Yes, the lack of an official extension space is unfortunate, but I >> don't think this needs to be a blocker -- the spec also doesn't >> include an DW_FORM extension space, but that

Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] DWP mixed (DWARFv4/pre-standard + DWARFv5) content

Yeah, this sounds tricky, but it is actually good timing, because I was just about to start working on DWP v5 in lldb. I was hoping that would be an easy ride, but it looks like things will get complicated. On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 18:53, David Blaikie wrote: > > (please add anyone who has a

Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] debug_names - what should go in ?

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 at 16:44, David Blaikie wrote: > I'd say any case where a consumer couldn't actually rely on the table to > do name resolution would be a bug - or at least something that needs to be > seriously considered/discussed/figured out how the name table can be