[dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
So out of curiosity, I ask, who uses the default config? And if not, what changes do you make (you can diff the default config to mine, I use dmenu and some different shortcuts). Maybe it would be time to rethink some values of the default config, esp. some shortcuts? 1. You stick with default

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Anthony Brown
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:32:35AM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: So out of curiosity, I ask, who uses the default config? And if not, what changes do you make (you can diff the default config to mine, I use dmenu and some different shortcuts). Maybe it would be time to rethink some values of

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Tako rzecze Anselm R. Garbe (w e-mailu datowanym 2007-02-09, 10:32): 1. You stick with default config? 2. You basically stick with default config, but a) use different colors/font b) use dmenu c) use some different shortcuts d) use more rules 3. You use totally different

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Stalwart
I modified almost everything. I think default config needs more examples of rules. Not all dwm users and wannabes are programmers and have regex knowledge (or are noob programmers without regex skills, like me). Also there should be note about XF86 keys. My config is here:

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Marek Bernat
On 2/9/07, Antoni Grzymala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I most definitely think that LAlt as default modkey is useless (except for old thinkpad users) and I suggest using the winkey as default. It is not totally useless, but certain aps require it a lot for normal work (blender, emacs).

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Sander van Dijk
On 2/9/07, Marek Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/9/07, Antoni Grzymala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I most definitely think that LAlt as default modkey is useless (except for old thinkpad users) and I suggest using the winkey as default. It is not totally useless, but certain aps require it

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Tako rzecze Antoni Grzymala (w e-mailu datowanym 2007-02-09, 11:14): LAlt really does interfere with a lot of applications and in my opinion separating the modkey for wm operations and the modkey for application operations has been a blessing for years (on different non-winkey platforms as

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Diego Biurrun
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:32:35AM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: So out of curiosity, I ask, who uses the default config? And if not, what changes do you make (you can diff the default config to mine, I use dmenu and some different shortcuts). Isn't config.arg.h the default config? ;) I never

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Ross Mohn
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 10:32 +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: So out of curiosity, I ask, who uses the default config? And if not, what changes do you make (you can diff the default config to mine, I use dmenu and some different shortcuts). Maybe it would be time to rethink some values of the

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread paul liljenberg
I use config.arg.h and only change the terminal to x-terminal-emulator. On 2/9/07, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So out of curiosity, I ask, who uses the default config? And if not, what changes do you make (you can diff the default config to mine, I use dmenu and some different

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Jeroen Schot
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:32:35AM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: So out of curiosity, I ask, who uses the default config? And if not, what changes do you make (you can diff the default config to mine, I use dmenu and some different shortcuts). Maybe it would be time to rethink some values of

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Tako rzecze Ross Mohn (w e-mailu datowanym 2007-02-09, 07:47): I think ALT is a good MODKEY. GUI Apps mostly use ALT to get up to the menu bar, such as ALT+M to open the forMat menu. If ALT+M is mapped in dwm (as it is for me), then I just use ALT+N to open the iNsert menu next to forMat and

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
some modifications in my config.h: #define FLOATSYMBOL ~ #define TILESYMBOL # #define NORMBGCOLOR #234 #define NORMFGCOLOR #bbb #define SELBGCOLOR #579 #define SELFGCOLOR #eee #define NORMBORDERCOLOR #234 #define SELBORDERCOLOR #579 #define MASTERH 680

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Kurt H Maier
Oh, another thing I do: #define FLOATSYMBOL FLOAT #define TILESYMBOL -- // Kurt H Maier

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Mike
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:32:35AM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: So out of curiosity, I ask, who uses the default config? And if not, what changes do you make (you can diff the default config to mine, I use dmenu and some different shortcuts). I suspect I fit into category (c). I was inspired

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 09:49:18AM -0500, Ross Mohn wrote: On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 10:32 +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: So out of curiosity, I ask, who uses the default config? And if not, what changes do you make (you can diff the default config to mine, I use dmenu and some different

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Ross Mohn
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 10:32 +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: So out of curiosity, I ask, who uses the default config? And if not, what changes do you make (you can diff the default config to mine, I use dmenu and some different shortcuts). Maybe it would be time to rethink some values of the

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Ross Mohn
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 15:51 +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 09:49:18AM -0500, Ross Mohn wrote: On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 10:32 +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: So out of curiosity, I ask, who uses the default config? And if not, what changes do you make (you can diff the

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Jonas Pfenniger
2007/2/9, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 1. You stick with default config? Adapted config.arg.h 2. You basically stick with default config, but b) use dmenu gmrun because dmenu is still too slow d) use more rules yes, in a different file -- Cheers, zimbatm

Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

2007-02-09 Thread Marek Bernat
On 2/9/07, Ross Mohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You must have readline in the default emacs mode. These two commands should help you out of that mess: What mess? I personally like emacs keys with readline much better than the vi ones. IMHO vi's keys are great for editing text, but not for

Re: [dwm] Full screen (presentation) mode?

2007-02-09 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 09:14:01AM -0600, Will Maier wrote: I build my presentations using LaTeX and beamer and display them using a PDF viewer. Recently, I have been using kpdf. This works just fine: I usually float a small kpdf window over my LaTeX work and watch it automatically refresh

[dwm] strange java behavior in opera

2007-02-09 Thread Marek Bernat
Hi there, I have a problem with java window in opera on the page http://www.sf.airnet.ne.jp/~ts/japanese/mvowels.html Firefox is doing all right. Here is the screenshot good: http://people.ksp.sk/~bee/firefox.png bad: http://people.ksp.sk/~bee/opera.png Both browsers are float. Not sure whose

Re: [dwm] strange java behavior in opera

2007-02-09 Thread Marek Bernat
On 2/9/07, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First of all tell me which version of dwm do you use? Second, please recheck if the same problem happens if you just run no window manager at all. Thanks in advance, Revision 743 Yes, it happens with no window manager as well. I suppose

Re: [dwm] strange java behavior in opera

2007-02-09 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 05:04:25PM +0100, Marek Bernat wrote: On 2/9/07, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First of all tell me which version of dwm do you use? Second, please recheck if the same problem happens if you just run no window manager at all. Thanks in advance,