[dwm] FYI

2007-02-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
http://programming.reddit.com/info/15yp3/comments (thanks to Felix Berger for reporting this to me) -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] recent changes since 3.6[.1]

2007-02-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 05:24:45PM +0100, pancake wrote: > > dwm-3.7 is on its way, and some more polishing appeared: > > > > - I replaced the Arg-union typedef with a const char *, this > > leads to a cleaner config.h in Key definitions, e.g. > > [..] > > { MODKEY,

Re: [dwm] speaking of terminology...

2007-02-22 Thread pancake
> arg wrote: >> I like untiled. The reason why I changed floating is that it >> clashes with the datatype, however tile() and untile() seem >> straight-forward. I go for it. > > > ... and tile/untile really shows that dwm is about tiling :_) untile is ok for me too.

Re: [dwm] speaking of terminology...

2007-02-22 Thread markus schnalke
arg wrote: > I like untiled. The reason why I changed floating is that it > clashes with the datatype, however tile() and untile() seem > straight-forward. I go for it. ... and tile/untile really shows that dwm is about tiling :_)

Re: [dwm] recent changes since 3.6[.1]

2007-02-22 Thread pancake
> dwm-3.7 is on its way, and some more polishing appeared: > > - I replaced the Arg-union typedef with a const char *, this > leads to a cleaner config.h in Key definitions, e.g. > [..] > { MODKEY, XK_d, incnmaster, "-1" }, \ > { MODKEY,

Re: [dwm] speaking of terminology...

2007-02-22 Thread Sander van Dijk
On 2/22/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So what's the ><> going to be replaced with now :-) ? It will stay, I like it and somehow it belongs to the soul of dwm ;) And I suggest to stick with "floating" as well. I really don't think people are going to confuse that with the C f

Re: [dwm] speaking of terminology...

2007-02-22 Thread Kurt H Maier
On 2/22/07, Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So what's the ><> going to be replaced with now :-) ? I use blank spaces for tiled and "UNTILED" for untiled. It's pretty user-friendly. ;) -- // Kurt H Maier

Re: [dwm] speaking of terminology...

2007-02-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 05:23:04PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote: > On 2/22/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I like untiled. The reason why I changed floating is that it > >clashes with the datatype, however tile() and untile() seem > >straight-forward. I go for it. > > So what's t

Re: [dwm] speaking of terminology...

2007-02-22 Thread Sander van Dijk
On 2/22/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I like untiled. The reason why I changed floating is that it clashes with the datatype, however tile() and untile() seem straight-forward. I go for it. So what's the ><> going to be replaced with now :-) ? Gr. Sander.

Re: [dwm] speaking of terminology...

2007-02-22 Thread Jack J. Woehr
Alexandru E. Ungur wrote: First time I saw the change from floating to versatile I'm not sure "versatile" is quite the word. Versatile applies to a doer, not to something done. A window manager may be versatile, but the layouts themselves are not ... the latter are the done, not the doer. Uh,

Re: [dwm] speaking of terminology...

2007-02-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:03:27AM -0600, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On 2/22/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >...I ask native English speakers if we should restore the term > >'versatile' back to 'floating' > > "Versatile" sounds a little grandiose. I liked "floating" but I think > "u

Re: [dwm] speaking of terminology...

2007-02-22 Thread Alexandru E. Ungur
>>> sender: "Kurt H Maier" date: "Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:03:27AM -0600" << On 2/22/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >...I ask native English speakers if we should restore the term > >'versatile' back to 'floating' > > "Versatile" sounds a little grandiose. +1 for that one :-) Firs

Re: [dwm] speaking of terminology...

2007-02-22 Thread Kurt H Maier
On 2/22/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...I ask native English speakers if we should restore the term 'versatile' back to 'floating' "Versatile" sounds a little grandiose. I liked "floating" but I think "untiled" or "mobile" is more accurate. I also like "radical" but that mig

[dwm] speaking of terminology...

2007-02-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
...I ask native English speakers if we should restore the term 'versatile' back to 'floating' - actually I like the versatile vs tile, but I'm not sure if it sounds acceptable to native speakers... Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] focusnext/prev

2007-02-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 03:34:05PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote: > maybe there could be found a better name for zoom() > I think it doesn't show it's functionality at once Hmm, I called it zoom because larswm did. -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] focusnext/prev

2007-02-22 Thread markus schnalke
pancake wrote: > xterm -> xterm -bg black -fg gray > ;; - white terms must be prohibited we should think about people using Xresources/Xdefaults files, cause AFAIK the commandline options overwrite these settings __ arg wrote: > - zoom() now only works in tiling layout maybe there could be fou

Re: [dwm] focusnext/prev

2007-02-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 03:14:42PM +0100, pancake wrote: > Why these two functions are separated ones? > > They share about 90% of code and receives no argument. > > IMHO they must be joined together into a "focus(1)" for next > and "focus(-1)" for the previous one. I implemented this. > We can

[dwm] recent changes since 3.6[.1]

2007-02-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
Hi there, dwm-3.7 is on its way, and some more polishing appeared: - I replaced the Arg-union typedef with a const char *, this leads to a cleaner config.h in Key definitions, e.g. [..] { MODKEY, XK_d, incnmaster, "-1" }, \ { MODKEY,

[dwm] focusnext/prev

2007-02-22 Thread pancake
Why these two functions are separated ones? They share about 90% of code and receives no argument. IMHO they must be joined together into a "focus(1)" for next and "focus(-1)" for the previous one. We can do something like focus(0) for selecting the first window of the list. Maybe, the algo can

Re: [dwm] Text selection I-beam is hard to see

2007-02-22 Thread John S. Yates, Jr.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:59:41, Antoni Grzymala wrote: >Emerge a set of cursors (like gentoo-xcursors for example) then: > > mkdir /usr/share/cursors/xorg-x11/default/ > vim /usr/share/cursors/xorg-x11/default/index.theme > >And in that file: > > [Icon Theme] > Inherits=gentoo-silver > >(or, alt

Re: [dwm] Text selection I-beam is hard to see

2007-02-22 Thread John S. Yates, Jr.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:44:45(GMT), David Tweed wrote: > Usual disclaimer: I only understand vague bits of X I've > needed to use. However, I was looking at this issue in > connect with an application I was writing and _AIUI_ all > the basic cursors (I-beam, pointer, etc) X applications/ > wm's use

Re: [dwm] Text selection I-beam is hard to see

2007-02-22 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Tako rzecze John S. Yates, Jr. (w e-mailu datowanym 2007-02-22, 01:03): > I posted this plea to both the Gentoo and Sabayon forums: > > > I run dwm as my window manager. Of course this reflects the fact > > that the vast majority of my windows are text (emacs or urxvt > > xterms). When the pointe

Re: [dwm] Text selection I-beam is hard to see

2007-02-22 Thread David Tweed
|start dwm. What do I need to do to use a different set |of pointer icons with dwm? Usual disclaimer: I only understand vague bits of X I've needed to use. However, I was looking at this issue in connect with an application I was writing and _AIUI_ all the basic cursors (I-beam, pointer, etc) X