* lobzang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-21 15:02:11 +0100]:
> Would be interested to know what terminal everyone's using...
urxvt
--
.vir.
Ricardo Lanziano
.d
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:42:31AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I created patch for reloading dwm with signal USR1.
Great! This will make it a lot easier to to hack on the dwm sources.
The while true; do dwm; done loop won't work for me because I use a X
logon manager (wdm) and with no way
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:02:11PM +0100, lobzang wrote:
> Would be interested to know what terminal everyone's using...
xterm from Debian because in no other term I got mixed multibyte
environments to work properly (Japanese Characters+German Umlauts).
Regards,
Christian
--
Christian.Garbs
On 3/21/07, lobzang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would be interested to know what terminal everyone's using...
Vanilla xterm as shipped with slackware 11 -- just set some Xresources to
invert the colors.
--
# Kurt H Maier
Would be interested to know what terminal everyone's using...
xterm -class UXTerm -title uxterm -u8 (uxterm)
Would be interested to know what terminal everyone's using...
urxvt
> Would be interested to know what terminal everyone's using...
urxvt
"Szabolcs Nagy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>> while true
>> do
>> cat $DWM_PIPE
>> done | /usr/bin/dwm
>
> it looks like a busy-loop
> shouldn't there be a sleep in there?
Though on the first look it seems to be one, in fact it isn't.
$DWM_PIPE is a fifo, so the loop idles most of the time un
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:25:54PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> Probably like:
>
> while true
> do
>while true
>do
>cat $DWM_PIPE
>done | /usr/bin/dwm
> done
>
> Greets, Sander.
It works here in this way:
while true
do
while true
do
/usr/local/bin/dwm < $HOME
"Sander van Dijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Probably like:
>
> while true
> do
>while true
>do
>cat $DWM_PIPE
>done | /usr/bin/dwm
> done
No, this doesn't work as while quitting dwm the inner while loop isn't
left. Anyway, I found a solution myself. This does work:
while
I tested st, but it looks a bit buggy... does anyone use it ?
it's not yet a terminal emulator, it's not released
Would be interested to know what terminal everyone's using...
urxvt
(but i'd probably won't see any difference if i'd switch to xterm)
On 3/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So may I tried it in some bad way ;(
There's no bad way I suppose, just the while loop :-)
Anyway, dwm is neither doing anything explicit to processes upon exit,
nor implicit,
seeing it's not an ancestor of the managed apps (pstree).
Sti
On (21/03/07 16:57), Marek Bernat wrote:
> To: dynamic window manager
> From: Marek Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 3/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Tried this and it did what I suppose it will do - all applications
> >executed from within dwm gets killed.
> >Wit
On 3/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tried this and it did what I suppose it will do - all applications
executed from within dwm gets killed.
With my patch you don't get this behaviour.
I am using the while loop and the apps survive the dwm restart.
Regards.
On 21/03/07, lobzang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would be interested to know what terminal everyone's using...
xterm.
Tom (spaceinvader)
On (21/03/07 09:27), Sander van Dijk wrote:
> To: dynamic window manager
> From: Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi,
>
> On 3/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I created patch for reloading dwm with signal USR1.
>
> Not to put your patch down, but with vanilla dwm y
I confirm urxvt is extremely fast ;)
I tested st, but it looks a bit buggy... does anyone use it ?
still looking for the perfect terminal, but for now urxvt is the
best/fast/powerfull...
FYI I use a fc6 urxvt rpm.
Would be interested to know what terminal everyone's using...
Lobzang.
On Sat, 200
Here is mine :
awk '
$0~/remaining capacity:/ { r=$3 }
$0~/last full capacity:/ { l=$4 }
$0~/charging state:/ { status=$3 }
END {
if ( status!="charged" ) {
if ( status=="charging" ) status="|¦|"
On 3/21/07, Oliver Heins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I ever wondered how I can achieve a behavior like this with a
construction similar to
while true
do
cat $DWM_PIPE
done | /usr/bin/dwm
Probably like:
while true
do
while true
do
cat $DWM_PIPE
done | /usr/bin/dwm
done
Gree
while true
do
cat $DWM_PIPE
done | /usr/bin/dwm
it looks like a busy-loop
shouldn't there be a sleep in there?
while true
do
sleep 1
cat $DWM_PIPE
done | dwm
"Sander van Dijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Not to put your patch down, but with vanilla dwm you can achieve
> something pretty similar by doing this in your .xinitrc:
>
> while true
> do
>dwm
> done
I ever wondered how I can achieve a behavior like this with a
construction similar to
w
just created patch to add fullscreen layout manager.
It show only one window (that is actualy selected) on screen, but maximized.
Switching between windows is then as usualy.
Hee hee. For some reason monocles always amuse me. Maybe I'm just
weird. In any case, changing the name to "max" or som
Hi,
kill -HUP doesn't work for me
instead I have to kill dwm and start it again.
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 09:28 +0100, pancake wrote:
> And why not just use kill -HUP?
>
> > Thank you!! I wanted to do something like this, but now I don't have to :)
> >
> >
>
>
>
Lobzang
And why not just use kill -HUP?
> Thank you!! I wanted to do something like this, but now I don't have to :)
>
>
Hi,
On 3/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I created patch for reloading dwm with signal USR1.
Not to put your patch down, but with vanilla dwm you can achieve
something pretty similar by doing this in your .xinitrc:
while true
do
dwm
done
Greetings, Sander.
25 matches
Mail list logo
