On 5/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had this bug too on Arch (since of hopped to Etch), but noticed when the
dialog was expanded with
Browse for other folders arrow, the flickering didn't happen.
tjb
thats true but if u do that (its the way i use it atm), the save as
Hi all,
just a simple question , is it possible to have dwm without any status
bar ? (just a blank screen in fact)
Lobzang
___
http://lobzang.free.fr
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:59:36PM +0200, lobzang wrote:
just a simple question , is it possible to have dwm without any status
bar ? (just a blank screen in fact)
It is possible if you hack the code, though it is dependent from
your intention, there are two motivations for this:
a) You want
I really like the b option and it would be very usefull to my setup. I
hope to see this option soon :D
On 5/11/07, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:59:36PM +0200, lobzang wrote:
just a simple question , is it possible to have dwm without any status
bar ?
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:15:17PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:59:36PM +0200, lobzang wrote:
just a simple question , is it possible to have dwm without any status
bar ? (just a blank screen in fact)
It is possible if you hack the code, though it is dependent
well I'm interested in both a b :)
a) I would then simply use dzen to notify any interesting information
( too much cpu / im conversation..)
b) that would be perfect indeed to show/hide the statusbar, so I could
forget a) !
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 15:15 +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
Is b) of
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:15:17PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
|
|What do others thing about my proposal?
b) option is really nice.
ciao
alex
--
Alessandro Dotti Contra | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bologna, Italy | PGP Key ID: 0x9C84C3DA
http://www.hyboria.org/ | jabber:
Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a) You want make dwm simplier ...
wasn't the old way to KISS?
customizing should be done by patching source code
right?
yes, a switch like suggested would surely be nice
... but perhaps simple would be better!?
just to think about
Meillo r e t
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:15:17PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
What do others thing about my proposal?
Hello,
I like this idea. I never liked the current #define TOPBAR true/false,
so this seems to me like a more elegant solution with added NOBAR and
runtime switching as a bonus.
