Frank Pirnay -- dwm (2007-05-23 01:35:13 +0200):
ok, I noticed the segfault when running dmenu_path manually. So that is the
only output I get using
uxterm or bash. Actually dmenu is running fine. I am using Ubuntu 7.04,
2.6.20-15-generic kernel on
2 systems but I have this problem only on
Frank Pirnay -- dwm (2007-05-23 09:16:45 +0200):
I thought about broken hardware too... I will try some memtesting today.
That's probably a good idea.
Anyway, this is my output:
+ CACHE=/home/knarf/.dmenu_cache
+ UPTODATE=1
+ IFS=:
+ test ! -f /home/knarf/.dmenu_cache
+ test 1
+ test
Anyway, this is my output:
+ CACHE=/home/knarf/.dmenu_cache
+ UPTODATE=1
+ IFS=:
+ test ! -f /home/knarf/.dmenu_cache
+ test 1
+ test /home/knarf/bin -nt /home/knarf/.dmenu_cache
+ test /usr/local/sbin -nt /home/knarf/.dmenu_cache
+ test /usr/local/bin -nt /home/knarf/.dmenu_cache
+
A silly question: can you generate the order in which it queries things
without actually doing the test and see what is being tested when the crash
occurs, and then look to see if it's some strange filesystem object (a
socket, dangling symlink, etc). The fact it's happening at the same place
Jukka Salmi -- dwm (2007-05-23 10:53:21 +0200):
Frank Pirnay -- dwm (2007-05-23 09:16:45 +0200):
I thought about broken hardware too... I will try some memtesting today.
That's probably a good idea.
Anyway, this is my output:
+ CACHE=/home/knarf/.dmenu_cache
+ UPTODATE=1
+
2007/5/23, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks! I applied it to the repo, however I'm not totally sure
the use of [ is a good idea. Is [ a symlink to test in any Unix?
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe http://www.suckless.org/ GPG key: 0D73F361
So, if functions are allowed then maybe
Premysl anydot Hruby -- dwm (2007-05-23 13:42:58 +0200):
So, if functions are allowed then maybe even better can be this:
--- a/dmenu_pathWed May 23 13:22:27 2007 +0200
+++ b/dmenu_pathWed May 23 13:37:33 2007 +0200
@@ -1,22 +1,16 @@
#!/bin/sh
CACHE=$HOME/.dmenu_cache
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 04:18:34PM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
On 5/23/07, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks! I applied it to the repo, however I'm not totally sure
the use of [ is a good idea. Is [ a symlink to test in any Unix?
I don't know, I do know it's a symlink to test
On 5/23/07, Diego Biurrun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The emacs comparison is nonsensical. test is a builtin in most shells
(offhand bash, ash, dash, ksh, pdksh, zsh, sash on this Debian system
where I have a login shell), so of course [ should be a builtin, too.
They're the same thing after all.
On 5/23/07, Jukka Salmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sander van Dijk -- dwm (2007-05-23 16:18:34 +0200):
I don't know, I do know it's a symlink to test in many linux distros.
I personally hate it though, since it obscures the fact that you are
calling a program (test is much clearer in this sense
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 09:28:47PM +0200, Marek Bernat wrote:
On 5/23/07, Sander van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's how it used to be, and I do believe that represents the
original UNIX spirit (do one thing, and do that right) much better
than the way it is in UNIX-like systems today.
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 01:42:58PM +0200, Premysl anydot Hruby wrote:
2007/5/23, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks! I applied it to the repo, however I'm not totally sure
the use of [ is a good idea. Is [ a symlink to test in any Unix?
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe
Hi,
changing resolutions while the bar is visible works as desired.
But when the bar is invisible and the resolution is changes, the bar
height is still subtracted from the screen size in configurenotify().
Windows won't go fullscreen anymore. After calling togglebar twice
everything is ok.
I
On 5/23/07, Sander van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you seen any language that make calls to tr, sed, awk, cut, cat,
etc.? Of course not. One could abuse the system() call of C to do
that, but that would just be stupid.
Then why do we continuously do this with the shell? Because the
On 5/23/07, Jukka Salmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sander van Dijk -- dwm (2007-05-23 23:03:10 +0200):
On 5/23/07, Marek Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the other hand kill, echo and other programs like this should of
course
be outside the shell.
Yes, [...]
...but on a system where you
15 matches
Mail list logo