On 10/27/07, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tuncer Ayaz dixit (2007-10-27, 13:14):
>
> > > Replying to you question from a latter e-mail, it only happens with my
> > > config.h so I'm including it for inspection.
> >
> > what about removing NULL in
> > const char *tags[] = { "1", "2",
Hi Sander,
"Sander van Dijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/27/07, Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is also possible. But my intention was that the user does not
> > decide wheather a function is tile or non-tile. It is the choice of
> > the programmer.
>
> Right, didn
Hi pancake,
pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The other reason I find cpt useful is for using it as a enhaced
> monocle layout replacement. If we found a way to always show the
> focused window at the first position of the list we can have
> a 'scrolleable' view of a tag reducing the view to N
"Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 07:12:24PM +0200, Robert Figura wrote:
> > "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I consider the idea of having a Button struct for 4.7.
[...]
> > >> How to give a client * to a handler?
>
> I'm not sure if I l
Sander van Dijk dixit (2007-10-27, 21:03):
> In case the 30 minutes aren't an exaggeration, doing a "diff -u
> config.def.h config.h | less" might save you some time in the future.
You see, my config.h is organized in a substantially different way and
diffing it (I used vimdiff) produced so much
Ruben Gonzalez Arnau dixit (2007-10-27, 20:05):
> Using sleep 1 && slock works for me, maybe is is a 'bad' workaround, but
> it works :)
I use a similar workaround for xtrlock (the problem came up long ago
during my first days with dwm (and dwm's first days, too) and the
solution was suggested by
Tuncer Ayaz dixit (2007-10-27, 13:14):
> > Replying to you question from a latter e-mail, it only happens with my
> > config.h so I'm including it for inspection.
>
> what about removing NULL in
> const char *tags[] = { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", NULL };
> so that it reads
> con
Il 2007-10-27, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> I could imagine a proceed() function which each layout
> should implement a la:
>
> Bool
> proceed(void (*func)(const char *)) {
> if(isarrange(tile))
> return func == setmwfact
> || func == zoom
On 10/27/07, Jeremy O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had this same problem when I tried to modify my custom config to suit
> dwm 4.6. After about 30 minutes of tinkering with my config.h, I
> _finally_ found the difference there. What was changed that made it so
> that the array doesn't requi
On 10/27/07, Jeremy O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > On 10/27/07, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Replying to you question from a latter e-mail, it only happens with
> > > my
> > > config.h so I'm inc
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:47:17AM +0200, Tube wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 08:39:20PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
>> > Hi there,
>> >
>> > I'm glad to announce new releases:
>> >
>> > http://www.suckless.org/download/dwm-4.6.tar.gz
>>
>> great, thanks again, anselm! die jahresend-curryw
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> On 10/27/07, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Replying to you question from a latter e-mail, it only happens with my
> > config.h so I'm including it for inspection.
>
> what about removing NULL in
> const char *
On 10/27/07, Tube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 06:13:54PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
[snip]
> > How do you run slock?
>
> via the shell. in former versions it didn't work by key combination
> either. and in even former versions it once worked ...
fyi, I can also confir
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 06:13:54PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> >
> > great, thanks again, anselm! die jahresend-currywurst ist dir sicher ;)
>
> Looking forward to the best Currywurst this year! ;)
yeah!
> > one thing that still doesn't work is slock. when called it darkens the
> > screen b
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:47:17AM +0200, Tube wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 08:39:20PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I'm glad to announce new releases:
> >
> > http://www.suckless.org/download/dwm-4.6.tar.gz
>
> great, thanks again, anselm! die jahresend-currywurst is
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 07:12:24PM +0200, Robert Figura wrote:
> "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I consider the idea of having a Button struct for 4.7.
>
> Thank you for your reply Anselm.
>
> One thing made me curious; do you already have an idea how to adress
> this:?
>
>
I have updated the wiki with your patch.
http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/clientspertag
--pancake
Hi Ritesh!
Welcome to the mailing list.
Thanks for the patch, but I would like to discuss it before merging
it to my patch because I don't want to make cpt modify dwm.c.
I think stdout of dwm is probably a missunderstood friend.
We can change all this patch by just adding a printf("%d/%d,cpt,n)
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 05:11:01PM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 10/27/07, Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is also possible. But my intention was that the user does not
> > decide wheather a function is tile or non-tile. It is the choice of
> > the programmer.
>
> Right
I agree to you. ISTILE is more noise for me. Its something related
to the layout and not to the user choice at a first instance.
User can change this behaviour by changing this value to false, but
imho this is a rarely case because a tiling layout is a tiling layout
and a floating layout it is not
I recomend you to use the nmaster layout which does not resizes clients
using hints, and this layout works like the native tile() one.
It's the way for not patching dwm again. My eyes neither support resizehints,
but if someone finds it "useful?", "correct?" or "important?" it's ok for me
to stay
On 10/27/07, Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is also possible. But my intention was that the user does not
> decide wheather a function is tile or non-tile. It is the choice of
> the programmer.
Right, didn't look at it that way. Now that we're talking about
ISTILE, I think th
This is also possible. But my intention was that the user does not
decide wheather a function is tile or non-tile. It is the choice of
the programmer.
2007/10/27, Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/27/07, Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I created a different
On 10/27/07, Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I created a different behavior of the istile-check. I think a layout
> should decide itself if it is a tiling or a non-tiling layout. I
> removed the ISTILE declaration and replaced it by a variable which is
> set by the layout fu
Hi!
I created a different behavior of the istile-check. I think a layout
should decide itself if it is a tiling or a non-tiling layout. I
removed the ISTILE declaration and replaced it by a variable which is
set by the layout functions.
What do you think about this?
--
http://www.gnuffy.org -
On 10/27/07, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Replying to you question from a latter e-mail, it only happens with my
> config.h so I'm including it for inspection.
what about removing NULL in
const char *tags[] = { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", NULL };
so that it read
Sander van Dijk dixit (2007-10-27, 09:41):
> On 10/27/07, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks arg (and all contributors), unfortunately the new dwm segfaults
> > on my computer. Since I don't know much about debugging C programs I
> > cannot provide a backtrace or what not (unles
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:44:18AM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 10/27/07, Arun G Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you know which ones need this ? I just have Firefox, pidgin (which
> > still steals focus) and xpdf. All of these maximize filling the
> > screen. Its just xterm. If anyone
On 10/27/07, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks arg (and all contributors), unfortunately the new dwm segfaults
> on my computer. Since I don't know much about debugging C programs I
> cannot provide a backtrace or what not (unless instructed).
>
> I noticed the segfault also on th
On Sat 27-10-2007 11:01 +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> I've decided to abandon the taglayouts patch in favour of a more
> general pertag patch.
>
> Currently, the patch keeps layout, mwfact, barpos and nmaster (if
> installed) per tag.
I switched the patch back from static to dynamic dec
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 09:45:08AM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> Btw. Anselm, I just noticed that the debug options aren't disabled in
> config.mk in 4.6. If Antoni's problem is going to cause a 4.6.1, I'd
> like to see that fixed as well.
The debug compile infos were enabled on accident, but th
On Fri 26-10-2007 17:09 +0100, Chris Webb wrote:
> Incidentally, something else needed for consistency when implementing
> taglayouts-type behaviour is to index all the layout parameters like
> mwfact, nmaster (if you have it) and nstack/ncols/nrows (if you have
> any of them). I don't think this
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 08:39:20PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm glad to announce new releases:
>
> http://www.suckless.org/download/dwm-4.6.tar.gz
great, thanks again, anselm! die jahresend-currywurst ist dir sicher ;)
one thing that still doesn't work is slock. when call
On 10/27/07, Arun G Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you know which ones need this ? I just have Firefox, pidgin (which
> still steals focus) and xpdf. All of these maximize filling the
> screen. Its just xterm. If anyone has a patch, please send it.
Btw, you are aware that you're choosing eye
On 10/27/07, Arun G Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, hacking tile().
> > But I think it's better to face the fact that some apps need this.
>
>
> Do you know which ones need this ? I just have Firefox, pidgin (which
> still steals focus) and xpdf. All of these maximize filling the
> screen.
> Yes, hacking tile().
> But I think it's better to face the fact that some apps need this.
Do you know which ones need this ? I just have Firefox, pidgin (which
still steals focus) and xpdf. All of these maximize filling the
screen. Its just xterm. If anyone has a patch, please send it.
Thanx,
On 10/27/07, Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, hacking tile().
> But I think it's better to face the fact that some apps need this. As
> has been mentioned before by others, clients that request inc-handling
> are going to waste space one way or the other (in or outside their
> win
On 10/27/07, Arun G Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I just upgrade to 4.6 and I see the "resizehints problem" again.
> The wallpaper shows up at the right side of the screen. A maximized
> $TERM doesn't fill the screen. Is there a way around it ?
Yes, hacking tile().
But I think it's
Btw. Anselm, I just noticed that the debug options aren't disabled in
config.mk in 4.6. If Antoni's problem is going to cause a 4.6.1, I'd
like to see that fixed as well.
Gr. Sander.
Hi,
I just upgrade to 4.6 and I see the "resizehints problem" again.
The wallpaper shows up at the right side of the screen. A maximized
$TERM doesn't fill the screen. Is there a way around it ?
--
...Keep Smiling...
On 10/27/07, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks arg (and all contributors), unfortunately the new dwm segfaults
> on my computer. Since I don't know much about debugging C programs I
> cannot provide a backtrace or what not (unless instructed).
$ ulimit -c unlimited
$ dwm
$ gdb
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2007-10-25, 20:39):
> Hi there,
>
> I'm glad to announce new releases:
>
> http://www.suckless.org/download/dwm-4.6.tar.gz
> http://www.suckless.org/download/dmenu-3.4.tar.gz
>
> Many thanks go to all contributors, developers, testers, and the
> dwm/dmenu community fo
42 matches
Mail list logo
