Re: [dwm] RESIZEHINTS gone in 4.6, how to get the old behaviour?

2007-11-01 Thread Vasil Dimov
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 16:18:44 +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote: On Oct 31, 2007 3:43 PM, pancake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: About the xsetroot 'fix' it's ugly as shit, the select border marks the window borders remarking the 10-20px hole. btw i usually have a black root on my Xwindows. It

[dwm] on the road to 4.7

2007-11-01 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
Hi there, I think it'll be a good idea to have a 4.7 release soon, because there are no major changes in the queue and hg tip feels much better than last 4.6 tarball ;) So I expect it will happen this weekend. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe http://www.suckless.org/ GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] [patch] old-new mouseresize behavior

2007-11-01 Thread Sander van Dijk
On Nov 1, 2007 11:44 AM, Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I wrote a little patch which brings the old resizing behavior. It reduces code complexibility and doesn't cost a single line of code. Hi Gottox, Is this pixel-perfect? If I recall correctly, we removed this way of

Re: [dwm] [patch] old-new mouseresize behavior

2007-11-01 Thread Enno Gottox Boland
As far as I can see, there are no such issues, but please review it. 2007/11/1, Sander van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Nov 1, 2007 11:44 AM, Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I wrote a little patch which brings the old resizing behavior. It reduces code complexibility and

Re: [dwm] [patch] old-new mouseresize behavior

2007-11-01 Thread Sander van Dijk
On Nov 1, 2007 12:58 PM, Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this is why I use abs()+1. The only possibility where this can be = 0 is an integer overflow. Yes, of course, sorry for the noise. Gr. Sander.

Re: [dwm] [patch] old-new mouseresize behavior

2007-11-01 Thread Enno Gottox Boland
this is why I use abs()+1. The only possibility where this can be = 0 is an integer overflow. 2007/11/1, Sander van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Nov 1, 2007 12:32 PM, Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As far as I can see, there are no such issues, but please review it. I will when I

[dwm] change tag on focus

2007-11-01 Thread pancake
it will be possible to make dwm change to another tag if a client outside the current tag is focused? Maybe the desired action would be to tag the focused window to the current tag or join both tags clients This is done, for example with sylpheed or with gaim when you click to a jid and the

Re: [dwm] clientspertag status message

2007-11-01 Thread Ritesh Kumar
On 10/31/07, Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/1/07, Ritesh Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently changing/toggling tags works correctly, however, the window in the new view may or may not be focused :(. Any ideas? you can either raisefocused() or focus(nexttiled(clients))