On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:29, Jonny Gerold wrote:
Hello,
I have a big problem. I have a brand new Thinkpad X61, and I'm using DWM
4.6 on Archlinux, and on idle something uses 45% of my CPU. And it's only
when I use dwm. I tried starting up fluxbox, and there is no issue? I have
an intel core
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:41, Giorgio Lando wrote:
While I am sorry to be unable to help you with your problem, I am
definitely interested to conky-nox11. What is it? It is not part of
conky and google is silent about it...
Giorgio Lando
It's a custom-built conky -- ./configure --disable-x11
This is ~100% of a single cpu on a dual core. So you'll be looping up
a cpu, check the while : ; do .. done loop in your .xinitrc. Does it
contains a sleep N ?
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 06:29:06PM -0800, Jonny Gerold wrote:
Hello,
I have a big problem. I have a brand new Thinkpad X61, and I'm
On Sun 11-11-2007 17:36 -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
Hmm... I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong here, but I updated
to the latest hg tip, ran a clean dwm and everything worked fine. Upon
applying the pertag patch, however, switching layouts causes dwm to
segfault. Maybe I missed
First of all, please make sure to subscribe to dwm@ in order to
post messages.
See below for my thoughts.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:24:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The attached message has been automatically discarded.
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:24:28 +0100
From: NoName [EMAIL
It's a custom-built conky -- ./configure --disable-x11 --disable-xft; make
Since I wanted to have both versions side by side, I just renamed the
resulting binary to conky-nox11.
Thanks, actually I am unable to build the latest 1.4.8 release with
--disable-x11, but 1.4.7 works really fine.
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:39, Giorgio Lando wrote:
Thanks, actually I am unable to build the latest 1.4.8 release with
--disable-x11, but 1.4.7 works really fine. Sorry to everyone for the
patent off-topic.
Giorgio
Actually, that's conky 1.4.5. I've been using that for a really long
time (TM).
Hi,
I have dropped xbindkeys and defined all my shortkeys in the config.h
of dwm. It works very very well.
However, I wonder why it is not possible to use the XF86 vendor specific
keysyms such as XF86Mail, XF86WWW and so. I associated these keysyms to
some of my multimedia keys with the help of
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:38:29PM +0100, Giorgio Lando wrote:
Hi,
I have dropped xbindkeys and defined all my shortkeys in the config.h
of dwm. It works very very well.
However, I wonder why it is not possible to use the XF86 vendor specific
keysyms such as XF86Mail, XF86WWW and so. I
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
On Sun 11-11-2007 17:36 -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
Hmm... I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong here, but I updated
to the latest hg tip, ran a clean dwm and everything worked fine. Upon
applying the pertag
10 matches
Mail list logo
