Re: [dwm] way towards 5.0

2008-05-18 Thread Tuncer Ayaz
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Steffen Liebergeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anselm R. Garbe wrote: Do people prefer having a fine-grain bar positioning setup or is it more preferred to have a bar setup in the sense top or bottom? I still believe the latter idea is nicer, if someone wants to

Re: [dwm] way towards 5.0

2008-05-18 Thread Jan Christoph Ebersbach
On Sat 17-05-2008 16:05 +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: Let me know how welcome do you feel about those changes. Bug reports are also welcome. I'm really wondering about the roadmap of dwm. - Since version 2.8 the development is officially finished, isn't it? From my point of view most of the

Re: [dwm] way towards 5.0

2008-05-18 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:07:37PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote: On Sat 17-05-2008 16:05 +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: Let me know how welcome do you feel about those changes. Bug reports are also welcome. I'm really wondering about the roadmap of dwm. - Since version 2.8 the

Re: [dwm] Documentation!

2008-05-18 Thread David Tweed
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, to sum up, what I think is stopping dwm is a really good solution for xinerama setups and maximize/monocle (maybe we could try with Anselm's idea of restoring geometries in focus changes? I could give it a try...).

Re: [dwm] Documentation!

2008-05-18 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 02:35:13PM +0100, David Tweed wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, to sum up, what I think is stopping dwm is a really good solution for xinerama setups and maximize/monocle (maybe we could try with Anselm's idea of

Re: [dwm] Documentation!

2008-05-18 Thread Steffen Liebergeld
Hi, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:21:59PM +0200, yy wrote: The 2 or 3 characters variable names have been there since the beginning to define geometries, I don't understand what the problem I kind of prefer short variable names, they are much easier to read, especially

Re: [dwm] Documentation!

2008-05-18 Thread Enno Gottox Boland
Hi! I completely disagree with you. First of all, your pen and paper equations are used only one time and that is when you do the equation. Afterwards you throw the paper away and go with the results. When programming, you have to make sure that the code is read- and understandable when

Re: [dwm] Documentation!

2008-05-18 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Steffen Liebergeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I completely disagree with you. First of all, your pen and paper equations are used only one time and that is when you do the equation. Afterwards you throw the paper away and go with the results. When programming,

Re: [dwm] Documentation!

2008-05-18 Thread Charlie Kester
* Steffen Liebergeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-18 19:38:00 +0200]: Hi, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:21:59PM +0200, yy wrote: The 2 or 3 characters variable names have been there since the beginning to define geometries, I don't understand what the problem I kind of

Re: [dwm] Documentation!

2008-05-18 Thread David Tweed
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Steffen Liebergeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I completely disagree with you. First of all, your pen and paper equations are used only one time and that is when you do the equation. Afterwards you throw the paper away and go with the results. When programming,