The floating layout is totally useless when it comes to mouseless usage
and even with the mouse there is no window manager that provides such
weak functionality to manage floating windows.
I disagree. I think the floating mode is as usable as in
traditional WMs -- which functionality
I usually install new versions of applications in my PREFIX, and dmenu
needs to update most of time the cache. When this happens, dmenu takes
the keyboard input and it's impossible to open a terminal or type things
in a chat, etc..
The 'esc' key is not handled directly, so you have to wait until
On (19/05/08 11:16), pancake wrote:
I usually install new versions of applications in my PREFIX, and dmenu
needs to update most of time the cache. When this happens, dmenu takes
the keyboard input and it's impossible to open a terminal or type things
in a chat, etc..
The 'esc' key is not
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 04:05:16PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
Here are the most recent changes I did to the codebase today
(most stuff towards 5.0 is done now).
- DEFGEOM is replaced by a function updategeom(), and a function
pointer updategeom in each layout definition
- removed
diff -u sic-0.9/LICENSE sic-0.9-ipv6/LICENSE
--- sic-0.9/LICENSE 2007-02-13 17:02:16.0 +0100
+++ sic-0.9-ipv6/LICENSE2008-05-19 13:32:09.0 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
MIT/X Consortium License
-(C)opyright MMV-MMVI Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+(C)opyright MMV-MMVIII
Hi Sylvain,
any chance to let us agree on the MIT license for the IPv6 bits?
Kind regards,
Anselm
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 01:51:18PM +0200, Sylvain Bertrand wrote:
diff -u sic-0.9/LICENSE sic-0.9-ipv6/LICENSE
--- sic-0.9/LICENSE 2007-02-13 17:02:16.0 +0100
+++
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do people prefer having a fine-grain bar positioning setup or is
it more preferred to have a bar setup in the sense top or
bottom? I still believe the latter idea is nicer, if someone
wants to use dzen, patch updategeom
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sylvain,
any chance to let us agree on the MIT license for the IPv6 bits?
Ok, make it all MIT ( 10 lines... :) ), but you should really consider
GPLv3 instead of MIT, just because we don't live in a perfect world...
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 04:02:51PM +0200, Sylvain Bertrand wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sylvain,
any chance to let us agree on the MIT license for the IPv6 bits?
Ok, make it all MIT ( 10 lines... :) ), but you should really consider
Why don't you just use the beerware license? It's really easy to
understand. And you will get a lot more out of it.
use single GPL licensed software, use Linux and secure your digital freedom!
You think this is freedom?
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:49:37AM -0400, hiro wrote:
Why don't you just use the beerware license? It's really easy to
understand. And you will get a lot more out of it.
I should consider dual-licensing it with the beer license ;)
--
Anselm R. Garbe http://www.suckless.org/ GPG key:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 4:52 PM, hiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
use single GPL licensed software, use Linux and secure your digital freedom!
You think this is freedom?
Freedom which does not defend itself *will* be abused again and again,
and after 15 years of software engineering, I said it's
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 05:17:18PM +0200, Sylvain Bertrand wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 4:52 PM, hiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
use single GPL licensed software, use Linux and secure your digital
freedom!
You think this is freedom?
Freedom which does not defend itself *will* be
Hello Anshelm,
* Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-19 16:33:36 +0200]:
My licensing reasons are rather pragmatic, the reasons why I
don't use the GPL* are:
1) I don't understand it completely and in any detail. So I
stick to MIT that I know and understand any impact of it.
If you
On Sun, 18 May 2008, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:07:37PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
The floating layout is totally useless when it comes to mouseless usage
and even with the mouse there is no window manager that provides such
weak functionality to manage
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:42 AM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:07:37PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
The floating layout is totally useless when it comes to mouseless usage
and even with the mouse there is no window manager that provides such
weak
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Sylvain Bertrand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freedom which does not defend itself *will* be abused again and again,
Define abuse? According to MIT/BSD, using the code in closed source
products is not abuse, it's simply use. Since that does not in any way
affect the
Define abuse? According to MIT/BSD, using the code in closed source
products is not abuse, it's simply use. Since that does not in any way
affect the freedom of the original MIT/BSD licensed code, it shouldn't
be a problem. Unless, of course, you want to restrict the users of
your code in
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Henrik Holst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:40:39PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been waiting for the code movement to slow down before looking at
it again. Can I just confirm dwm will still technically work linked
against
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:54:40AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:42 AM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:07:37PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
The floating layout is totally useless when it comes to mouseless usage
and even
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 07:57:43PM +0200, Enno Gottox Boland wrote:
Define abuse? According to MIT/BSD, using the code in closed source
products is not abuse, it's simply use. Since that does not in any way
affect the freedom of the original MIT/BSD licensed code, it shouldn't
be a
Hi Sander,
just my personal point of view:
* Sander van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-19 19:48:51 +0200]:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Sylvain Bertrand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freedom which does not defend itself *will* be abused again and again,
Define abuse? According to
On (19/05/08 20:34), Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
From: Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, for mainstream dwm my opinion has always been to stick to
mouse only. But I had occasional cases when I'd like to have
keyboard driven resizals as well, esp.
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I will include something like this in the future.
Out of curiosity, which keybindings are you using to achieve
keyboard-driven movements and resizals, since Mod1-{h,j,k,l} are
taken already.
At first I used M-C
Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that things will settle with 5.0, because I already
focus more on st.
was waiting for that to come true for quite a long time. :-)
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Matthias Kirschner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are people (like) you who say modified BSD/MIT licenses are more
free, because users/developers have the freedom to make the software
unfree. (More a freedom of the individual.)
No no, it's not just people
This is the buttonpress patch I have just talked about (incremental to
the domax patch). It adds a lot of new functionality, i.e.:
- It reverts the old zooming with middle mouse button (or toggling
floating if not in tiled layout) with a click inside the window
(+ModKey) or in the bar.
- With the
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Matthias Kirschner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had university seminars about the term freedom,
Your lack of clarity on relevant concepts is not grounds for an ethos.
Freedom is an absence of restrictions. The GPL implements
restrictions; therefore, it lessens
Many are very wrong. The BSD like licenses have more freedom than GPL
licenses... since you can wipe out freedom from the code.
What is a freedom which can destroy itself?
It's is *not* a comparison based on the amount of freedom of each
type of license. That's plain stupid.
People who are
it's so easy guys.
freedom is when you don't mind looking into LICENSE.
Ever heard of pipi langstrumpf?
31 matches
Mail list logo
