Applied.
Thanks a lot!
--Anselm
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 07:43:29PM +0200, Enno Gottox Boland wrote:
There was a mistake in config.def.h. Here's the fixed on.
2008/5/21, Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
I added the void *arg feature to dwm and diffed it together with the
2008/5/22, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Applied.
Thanks a lot!
void
-toggletag(const char *arg) {
- unsigned int i, j;
+toggletag(void *arg) {
+ int i, m = *(int *)arg;
+ for(i = 0; i sizeof(int) * 8; i++)
+ fputc(m 1 i ? '1' : '0', stdout);
+
I was too tired of defining 4 different keys for each tag inside
config.h, so I created a TAGKEYS macro. I vote for its inclusion in
main dwm. I was thinking about having the (uint[]){ 1 Tag} inside
the macro, or even (uint[]){ 1 (Key - 1)} , but since it is in
config.h all that is up to you and
On Mon 19-05-2008 20:34 +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
Maybe I will include something like this in the future. Out of
curiosity, which keybindings are you using to achieve keyboard-driven
movements and resizals, since Mod1-{h,j,k,l} are taken already.
Good question. For a long time I remapped
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-05-17, 16:05):
- removed reapply()
[...]
Let me know how welcome do you feel about those changes. Bug
reports are also welcome.
I'm not sure removing reapply() and forcing people to restart dwm is a
neat idea for those using logon managers. Quitting dwm ends my
On Mon 19-05-2008 18:30 +0200, Rockwolf wrote:
I too think the floating layout is necessary. But if you don't like
it, you can always turn it of in the config. I really like this
config.h stuff, you can throw out anything you don't like ^^ and only
if no-one likes it, it might be worth
I understand what you mean. And I didn't know you could tile by default
with that rule. But that's pretty radical ^^
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
No doubt about the usefulness of the floating layout. I was just
criticising the few functionality for floating windows
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 08:17:47PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-05-17, 16:05):
- removed reapply()
[...]
Let me know how welcome do you feel about those changes. Bug
reports are also welcome.
I'm not sure removing reapply() and forcing people to
On 5/22/08, Johannes Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while true
do
echo temp $((`sysctl -n hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature`/10-273))°C
batt `sysctl -n hw.acpi.battery.life`%
sleep 1
done | while true; do
dwm
done
this way the information in the statusbar is
On 5/22/08, Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this way the information in the statusbar is outdated (by 1 second)
ah sorry
this is bullshit
never mind
On 5/22/08, David Tweed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#define TAGMASK ((int)((1LL LENGTH(tags) + 1) - 1))
Incidentally, I think in the alphabet soup misdesign of C numeric
constants, I suspect the code probably wants 1ULL and given long long
is 64-bits and int is 32-bit on most 64-bit
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/22/08, David Tweed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..but (if eg int is 32 bit and we have 32 tags then) 132 is 0, and
-1 is all ones in binary (guaranteed by the c standard)
Ah, my mistake. I've spent too long writing 64-bit
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wrote on Thu, 22 May 2008 20:17:47 +0200:
| - removed reapply()
| I'm not sure removing reapply() and forcing people to restart dwm is a
| neat idea for those using logon managers. Quitting dwm ends my Xsession,
| kills the X clients and takes me back to xdm.
|
| Perhaps I'm
13 matches
Mail list logo
