Looking into your patch I more and more come to the conclusion
to add an extra void *aux field to Client for extensions like
this (or the previous extensions proposed in the toggle{vert,horiz} patches.
With this in 5.1 you could easily keep your patchset upwards
compatible if you use Client-aux
2008/7/2, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looking into your patch I more and more come to the conclusion
to add an extra void *aux field to Client for extensions like
this (or the previous extensions proposed in the toggle{vert,horiz} patches.
With this in 5.1 you could easily keep your
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:35:38AM +0200, yy wrote:
2008/7/2, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looking into your patch I more and more come to the conclusion
to add an extra void *aux field to Client for extensions like
this (or the previous extensions proposed in the toggle{vert,horiz}
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:30:58AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
Looking into your patch I more and more come to the conclusion
to add an extra void *aux field to Client for extensions like
this (or the previous extensions proposed in the toggle{vert,horiz} patches.
With this in 5.1 you
Another thing:
I don't think that the design of dwm fits well with the
layouting concept of wmii. This is because dwm depends on the
assumption that the layout algorithm in use is dynamic enough to
deal with arbitrary amounts of windows which are singly-linked,
whereas wmii basically has more
Hi,
A little bug I found, so I fixed it !
When deleting a window, no call of wnohole() so holes appeared in the wtable
so warrange() didn't resize windows properly !
Kind regards.
QUINTIN Guillaume.
dwm.wmii.diff
Description: Binary data
On 7/2/08, QUINTIN Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A little bug I found, so I fixed it !
this is the dwm ml, there is a wmii ml as well
On 7/2/08, Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/2/08, QUINTIN Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A little bug I found, so I fixed it !
this is the dwm ml, there is a wmii ml as well
oh sorry i misread (..wmii.diff confused me)
..so this is a dwm patch
2008/7/2, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Another thing:
I don't think that the design of dwm fits well with the
layouting concept of wmii. This is because dwm depends on the
assumption that the layout algorithm in use is dynamic enough to
deal with arbitrary amounts of windows which are
Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here is a time vs sloc plot (instead of revision vs sloc)
I like that one.
Maybe we should have x-axis descriptions for time, revision and
releases ... but maybe thats overkill then ;-)
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi
Each time I want to post I start a new thread, how do I do to answer
somebody ?
@Anselm :
Well, adding a void* aux to the Client structure sounds like a good idea
but it is a first step towards adding official (or simply more
advanced) support for plugins, I think. I mean that you will
Well, I figured out how works (I hope) the mailing list !
@Anselm
Hmm, how would an action argument to arrange() help? What might
this argument look like?
The first idea that pops in my head is to have 3 arguments. An int one
which is an ID defining the action performed on the window :
12 matches
Mail list logo
