On 9/7/08, Amit Uttamchandani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not include the DWM wiki pages in a "doc/" directory in the source
> tarball? It wouldn't bump up the size significantly and it would greatly
> help a lot of users. I guess one could ask why not just go to the online
> browse the wiki?
I upgraded from version 4.9 to 5.1 the other day and found quite a bit of
changes in the way rules are defined. Initially I couldn't figure it out so I
searched the mailing list archives and found a few posts regarding how the new
rules config works. The wiki also contains quite a bit of useful
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 11:22 PM, carmen r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and how do you open a terminal?
Alt+F2 brings up a "run" dialog in xfce.
Kurt
On Sat Sep 06, 2008 at 12:58:53PM +0200, Martin Sander wrote:
> Hey. I thought about buying a netbook, too, and here are my two cents:
>
> I saw the Eeepc 900 sitting next to a Acer Aspire One in a shop and
> tried both of them, and I have one major conclusion:
> If touchtyping is important for yo
I'm not sure I understand the point of this patch. calloc is defined
in both C89 and C99, and is both fairly generic and very widely used,
so I fail to see anything safer or more portable about this approach.
Not to mention that fact that most people prefer not to use structure
assignments...
Bren
In manage(), we use calloc in order to initialise to all-zeros the newly
allocated Client structure object.
A preferable, safer and more portable way of achieving such initialisation
is to use the compiler's static initialisation.
Here is the change in manage():
- Client *c, *t = NULL;
+
2008/9/6 Brendan MacDonell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 10:35 AM, bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I added that but have no idea where the error log resided.
>> Nevertheless, I simplified that line to
>>
>> if(!XGetWMNormalHints(dpy, c->win, &size, &msize))return;
>>
>> and t
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 10:35 AM, bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I added that but have no idea where the error log resided.
> Nevertheless, I simplified that line to
>
> if(!XGetWMNormalHints(dpy, c->win, &size, &msize))return;
>
> and the issue is also fxied. My theory is that if XGetWMNorma
On Sat, 06 Sep 2008, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2008/9/6 bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sat, 06 Sep 2008, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> >> composition of all P* constants. Since PSize is never used in dwm's
> >> updatesize() algorithm this change doesn't fix or change anything in
> >> my opinion. If
Hey. I thought about buying a netbook, too, and here are my two cents:
I saw the Eeepc 900 sitting next to a Acer Aspire One in a shop and
tried both of them, and I have one major conclusion:
If touchtyping is important for you (and I guess it is, otherwise you
wouldn't be reading this mailing lis
2008/9/6 bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> composition of all P* constants. Since PSize is never used in dwm's
>> updatesize() algorithm this change doesn't fix or change anything in
>> my opinion. If anyone sees an explanation why this change regarding
>
On Sat, 06 Sep 2008, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> composition of all P* constants. Since PSize is never used in dwm's
> updatesize() algorithm this change doesn't fix or change anything in
> my opinion. If anyone sees an explanation why this change regarding
> the blog entry could fix something, please
2008/9/3 Donald Chai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 2008/9/2 Donald Chai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> The current arrange() procedure hides and shows windows in the order
>>> specified by "clients". This causes a lot of flicker and unnecessary
>>> screen
>>> redraws when there are many overlapping windows
David Tweed wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Kurt H Maier wrote:
> >> I have a string of thinkpads. The newest model I have is a T43, and
> >> after my wife brought home an X41 on loan from her employer I
> >> considered buying one.
Applied
Thank you!
2008/9/4 Martin Hurton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> The patch below changes the checkotherwm() function so that the xerrorlib
> is initialised before changing the error handler, not after. Please comment.
>
> /Martin
>
>
> diff -r 8a9a1dbeff49 dwm.c
> --- a/dwm.c Tue Sep
Hi there,
2008/9/6 bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I compiled from dwm source 5.2, and it works quite smoothly except
> feh raised an X error. I googled and found a Japanese gentleman
> also experienced this bug and proposed it should to be reverted. I
> tried his suggestion and fixed the issue.
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
