On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:59:05AM +0100, Uriel wrote:
> Good point, probably the werc stylesheet should be split and
> reorganized to avoid this kind of issues, I will think about it.
>
> Also, www.suckless.org is *SLOW* to the point of being unusable, and
> i'm sure that is not werc's fault beca
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Jimmy Tang wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:57:36AM -0700, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
>>
>> do you run native mac os x apps with dwm or just x11 apps or both?
>>
>
I guess I can say I'm doing the same thing although my
"implementation" is different and I'm cheati
He's probably talking about the front page, screenshot here:
http://bayimg.com/image/caombaabd.jpg
# Kurt H Maier
It's not that slow to me... although it could definitely use some
caching to keep from reloading the stylesheets every time.
(Last-Modified header etc)
Jeremy
On Wed 11 Mar 2009 - 12:59AM, Uriel wrote:
> Good point, probably the werc stylesheet should be split and
> reorganized to avoid this kind
What wiki are you talking about? Dirdir (part of werc) uses unix
timestamps, and blagh (the werc blog engine) uses /mm/dd.
uriel
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:36 AM, markus schnalke wrote:
> I suggest to change the date format (on the entry page) into
> -mm-dd. The current format is confusin
Good point, probably the werc stylesheet should be split and
reorganized to avoid this kind of issues, I will think about it.
Also, www.suckless.org is *SLOW* to the point of being unusable, and
i'm sure that is not werc's fault because http://cat-v.org and many
other werc sites are quite fast.
u
Greetings,
suckless.org currently links to two stylesheets /pub/style/style.css and
/_werc/pub/style.css both are active for media screen. The former
stylesheet (/pub) uses among other things orange background for the
midHeader class. This results in a split-second display of a different
colour sc
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:27:16PM +0200, Daniel Bainton wrote:
>
> If you use x11 more, why not just install a linux distro and be happy?
> No point in having OS X behind that all...
>
yea people say that installing linux/bsd is better, but i at least get
pretty good hardware support for the ba
On Tue 10 Mar 2009 at 13:27:16 PDT Daniel Bainton wrote:
If you use x11 more, why not just install a linux distro and be happy?
No point in having OS X behind that all...
Or one of the BSD's, if you don't like the GNUish cruft you get with
Linux.
2009/3/10 Jimmy Tang :
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:57:36AM -0700, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
>>
>> do you run native mac os x apps with dwm or just x11 apps or both?
>>
>
> i tend to ssh into remote hosts to do work so i often have many xterms
> open in different tags which is much easier to naviga
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:57:36AM -0700, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
>
> do you run native mac os x apps with dwm or just x11 apps or both?
>
i tend to ssh into remote hosts to do work so i often have many xterms
open in different tags which is much easier to navigate then in native
osx with the
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:18:57 +
Jimmy Tang wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:47:45PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > For those of you who haven't noticed, we are applying as a mentoring
> > organization during GSoC2009 this year.
> >
> > http://www.suckless.org/GSoC2009
> >
>
> just had
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:47:45PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> For those of you who haven't noticed, we are applying as a mentoring
> organization during GSoC2009 this year.
>
> http://www.suckless.org/GSoC2009
>
just had a quick look and noticed a blurb on dwm on osx, i've been
running dwm o
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:47:45PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> For those of you who haven't noticed, we are applying as a mentoring
> organization during GSoC2009 this year.
>
> http://www.suckless.org/GSoC2009
>
> We set up a new mailing list for GSoC specific questions which is
> world-writa
For those of you who haven't noticed, we are applying as a mentoring
organization during GSoC2009 this year.
http://www.suckless.org/GSoC2009
We set up a new mailing list for GSoC specific questions which is
world-writable here:
g...@suckless.org
We do not know yet if we will be accepted.
Kind
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Richard Pöttler
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to ask you guys if you could recommend me a tool to
> unit test my C code. So far I only found CUnit, Check and CuTest but
> haven't dug into any of them. Do you have any suggestions?
I haven't yet used it, but Google
On 3/10/09, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/3/10 Richard Pöttler :
>> I just wanted to ask you guys if you could recommend me a tool to
>> unit test my C code. So far I only found CUnit, Check and CuTest but
>> haven't dug into any of them. Do you have any suggestions?
>
> #include
>
i see two imme
I suggest to change the date format (on the entry page) into
-mm-dd. The current format is confusing because you never know if
it is dd/mm/ or mm/dd/. To solve this problem and to provide a
sane date format that works well with ``computer logic'', the ISO 8601
was created.
Please consi
2009/3/10 Richard Pöttler :
> I just wanted to ask you guys if you could recommend me a tool to
> unit test my C code. So far I only found CUnit, Check and CuTest but
> haven't dug into any of them. Do you have any suggestions?
#include
;)
Kind regards,
--Anselm
Hi,
I just wanted to ask you guys if you could recommend me a tool to
unit test my C code. So far I only found CUnit, Check and CuTest but
haven't dug into any of them. Do you have any suggestions?
bye
richi
--
quoting guide: http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/quotingguide.html
pgp8k9YVvRA6B
2009/3/9 Uriel :
> Good work Anselm!
>
> And anyone interested in werc, see: http://werc.cat-v.org
>
> uriel
>
> P.S.: Can you make http://suckless.org work properly and
> http://www.suckless.org redirect to it? (Or the other way around if
> you really prefer it that way, although I prefer no www.)
21 matches
Mail list logo
