Re: [dwm] Issues with border

fullack. 2009/2/19, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com: Hi, I dislike the recent addition of the 0 border if only 1 tiled client is in the view, reasons: - gained screen real eastate is very minimal - configure events are increased by n at any view() and toggleview(), if n is the

Re: [dwm] Issues with border

A patch to remove adjustborder is attached. 2009/2/19, David E. Thiel l...@redundancy.redundancy.org: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:34:48PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote: And then define a key binding for it. Opinions? Seems I'm one of the few that prefers the no-border option. If there

Re: [dwm] Making it a million and one

Quite easy. Start reading the manpage, README, and the source. 2009/2/16 I. Khider cont...@ikhider.com: Hello Fellow DWM Users, This question is probably asked a million times...but I would like to find a definitive manual on DWM. I want to know it better and do things like put the time on

[dwm] [PATCH] fprintf where fputs is sufficiant

I think fprintf is unneeded here. Have fun! diff -r 85a8eff4c123 dwm.c --- a/dwm.c Thu Feb 12 17:26:12 2009 +0100 +++ b/dwm.c Sat Feb 14 12:34:51 2009 +0100 @@ -1713,7 +1713,7 @@ die(usage: dwm [-v]\n); if(!setlocale(LC_CTYPE, ) || !XSupportsLocale()) -

[dwm] [PATCH] small fix in propertynotify

looks like a typo. diff -r cf81cf8ab206 dwm.c --- a/dwm.c Sun Feb 08 12:11:35 2009 + +++ b/dwm.c Thu Feb 12 17:13:40 2009 +0100 @@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ Window trans; XPropertyEvent *ev = e-xproperty; - if((ev-window == root) (ev-atom = XA_WM_NAME)) +

Re: [dwm] Re: stdin to statusbar output removed?

simplified: while xsetroot -name `date` `uptime | sed 's/.*,//'`; do sleep 1 done exec dwm 2009/2/10, Pavel Samek psa...@redash.cz: Neale Pickett ne...@... writes: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.window-managers.dwm/6874 Yes! And here is also a hint how to make

Re: [OT] OFFTOPIC (was: Re: [dwm] Bottom-posting and reply trimming (was: Bottom Stack Patch))

don't introduce totally senseless rules noone respects. btw stfu. :) thanks. Gottox 2009/2/10, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com: how about that? On 2/10/09, markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de wrote: [2009-02-10 06:51] Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com Please mark mailing-list etiquette

Re: [dwm] Re: Crash-only software

crash only... even the name sucks. 2009/2/4, markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de: [2009-02-03 22:33] Marcin Cieslak sa...@system.pl I don't like this approach. I have always preferred software that fails fast. As soon as something is wrong - just abort with debugging information what

Re: [dwm] Virtual keyboards

This is the patchset in dwm-gtx: http://s01.de/~gottox/hg/dwm/rev/d3c3a8018349 It should be easy to port it to dwm. regards Gottox 2009/1/22, Sergey Dolgov sol...@gmail.com: On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:54:47PM +0100, Peter Hartlich wrote: I'm using dwm-gtx now for this very purpose (I have

Re: [dwm] dwm on tablet pc

Try dwm-gtx. Onscreenkeyboards should work with it. :) 2008/12/12, jo...@freenet.de jo...@freenet.de: Has anyone tried to run dwm on a tablet pc and has a working patch set? I do not have a keyboard (no convertible); therefor: = cellwriter as an onscreen keyboard Kind regards, joten

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

Also released: dwm-gtx-5.3 * patch: http://s01.de/~gottox/files/dwm/dwm-gtx-5.3.diff * tarball: http://s01.de/~gottox/files/dwm/dwm-gtx-5.3.tar.gz * website: http://s01.de/~gottox/index.cgi/proj_dwm regards Gottox -- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro

Re: [dwm] subnotebooks take two

I'm using eeepc 1000H, too. What I really like about it is the small size. I was using Thinkpad x-series Notebooks before and what I really miss on the 1000H is the hardware volume control. Nevertheless the connectivity of the eeepc is great and the keyboard is still ok (but still not as good as

[dwm] small comment fix

Hi! The header-comment in dwm.c says that the Client struct is a double linked list. This is not true anymore. regards Gtx -- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy) diff -r 41678fc29f2a dwm.c --- a/dwm.c Sun Oct

Re: [dwm] Re: Patch: pertag for dwm-5.2

see http://www.suckless.org/dwm/patches/pertag.html 2008/10/15, v4hn [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ev'ning, On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 05:34:08PM +0200, Fredrik Ternerot wrote: Updated to also support toggle layout per tag. /Fredrik On 9/13/08, Fredrik Ternerot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.2 / dmenu-3.9

Hi there! I want to announce that dwm-gtx-5.2 is released too. It can be downloaded as tarball as well as patchset to vanilla dwm. It extends dwm with better Xinerama support, automaticle pointer movement (wmii-2.5 style) and an additional Layout called deck to work better with small screens (=

[dwm] [PATCH] dwm-tip-nozerokeycode.diff

Hi! I use my config.h on different hosts. On my notebook I defined the multimedia keys without any modifier. on another host there are no keycodes defined for these keys. This leads XKeysymToKeycode to return 0. Unfortunally XGrabKey grabs all keys for this specific modifier if keycode is zero.

Re: [dwm] A talk about suckless.org and dwm

Hi Markus! I would be pleased if you could add dwm-gtx to dwms children. regards Gottox 2008/8/26, markus schnalke [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hoi community, two weeks ago I was at the CCC-Stuttgart LightningTalk event and did a presentation about suckless.org and dwm. You find the (English)

Re: [dwm] [patch] Minor code cleanup

Hi! 2008/8/13, Martin Hurton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Can arg really ever be NULL? no, that should not be possible anymore. the patch is ok so far. Cheers, regards Gottox -- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy)

Re: [dwm] [patch] Minor code cleanup

Hi! The patch works fine here for me. 2008/8/13, Premysl Hruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hm, that's true, but I'm sure that dwm crashed without check if arg is not null (in view()). That's a relict from the old char/void pointer which was used instead of the Arg union for a long time. I added the

[dwm] [bgs] - back ground setter

Hi! I wrote a small replacement for feh to set my desktop background. It uses imlib2, is Xinerama and Xrandr aware and its size is only about 230sloc. Link: http://s01.de/~gottox/index.cgi/proj_bgs Mercurial: http://s01.de/~gottox/hg/bgs Tarball: http://s01.de/~gottox/files/bgs/bgs-0.1.tar.gz

Re: [dwm] [bgs] - back ground setter

Hi! It does this, because bgs needs to rearrange the background images when the Xinerama setup is changed. I simply use bgs image in my .xinitrc. regards Gottox 2008/7/13, James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 02:07:53PM +0200, Enno Gottox Boland wrote: Hi! I wrote

Re: [dwm] [bgs] - back ground setter

I'm considering to introduce a switch to disable updating if it's not necessary. 2008/7/13, Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! It does this, because bgs needs to rearrange the background images when the Xinerama setup is changed. I simply use bgs image in my .xinitrc. regards

Re: [dwm] [bgs] - back ground setter

Hi! Ah ok, I disabled Xinerama had compile time. How about putting that part of the code if a #ifdef XINERAMA or something? I guess tho if you want the behavior to be the same then a switch would be good. No, that would mean to introduce more #ifdefs. I introduced a switch and released

Re: [dwm] patch for 5.0.1: interior borders only

Hi! I evaluated this border style some time ago. And I must say I still prefer the original behavior of dwm. The problem about you're borderstyle is, that my brain needs more time to identify the selected window. Also I don't use resizehints, as some clients really start to fuck up if it's set to

Re: [dwm] 9vx

Yay, I tried it, and it feels very speedy in contrast to qemu. But there are still some bugs related to networking and I was unable to run webfs. Nevertheless it's a great tool. 2008/6/29, Tuncer Ayaz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I first read about vx32 some days ago and thought that userid on the site

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.0 / dmenu-3.7

forget what I send before, here's a real fix: 2008/6/19, Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED]: fix attached 2008/6/18, yy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I don't know how nobody found this one sooner. It has happened to me just after the announcement, but there is a bug in 5.0. You shouldn't

Re: [dwm] beta dwm-5.0

Hi! I'm a potential new DWM user who feels the same as the above. I've been playing musical window managers recently trying to find one that I really like. The main things I'm looking for are: * No or minimal window decorations dwm draws a 1px border and nothing else :) * Can do

[dwm] [PATCH] drawtext fix

Hi! Here's a small fix/simplyfication to drawtext(). Have fun! :) regards Gottox -- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy) diff -r c4152a0199c8 dwm.c --- a/dwm.c Fri Jun 06 11:49:31 2008 +0200 +++ b/dwm.c

[dwm] [patch] simplification to drawtext

Hi! Here's a small simplification to drawtext. regards Gottox -- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy) diff -r 2488c46e002c dwm.c --- a/dwm.c Thu May 29 18:42:53 2008 +0100 +++ b/dwm.c Sun Jun 01 12:36:37

Re: [dwm] [patch] simplification to drawtext

beware that it should be memcpy(buf[MAX(0, len - 3)], ..., 4); not memcpy(buf[MAX(0, len - 3)], ..., 3); otherwise it will overwrite the zero-terminator if len 3. Furthermore it will change the length of the string if len 3, which has no impact on the output, as XDrawString respects len,

Re: [dwm] Maximised Window + Empty Tag

I can reproduce this issue. 2008/5/29, Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I don't know if I missed something, but if I toggle a window maximised (which was previously monocle) and select an empty tag, the window still appears. If it's not maximised everything works fine. Any

Re: [dwm] using bitaray for tags (PATCH)

Here's my version of a bitarray patch. Please review and comment. 2008/5/20, yy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2008/5/20, Premysl Hruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, This is realization of Gottox's proposal discuted on IRC today. It handles tags not as Bool [], but as bit-array saved in int.

Re: [dwm] using bitaray for tags (PATCH)

Hi! 2008/5/21, Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: in config.h referencing tags has changed in rules but not in keys. Yes, arg has discussed yesterday if it's possible to change const char *arg to void *arg. if this works, i'll change the key behavior too. the (1 tagnum) in rules is a bit nasty

Re: [dwm] using bitaray for tags (PATCH)

2008/5/21, Premysl Hruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tagmask can be #define: #define TAGMASK ((int)(1LL (LENGTH(tags) + 1) - 1)) Thanks! Here's the updated patch -- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy) diff -r

Re: [dwm] using bitaray for tags (PATCH)

Here is yet another update to the patch which includes chances discussed on #dwm. 2008/5/21, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi I like your patches (also the version of anydot). On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:49:16AM +0200, Enno Gottox Boland wrote: 2008/5/21, Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL

Re: [dwm] bitarray and void *arg (was: using bitaray for tags (PATCH))

There was a mistake in config.def.h. Here's the fixed on. 2008/5/21, Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! I added the void *arg feature to dwm and diffed it together with the other changes. Please review the patch carefully, as I changed a lot. Thanks! 2008/5/21, Enno Gottox

Re: [dwm] sic ipv6 patch

Define abuse? According to MIT/BSD, using the code in closed source products is not abuse, it's simply use. Since that does not in any way affect the freedom of the original MIT/BSD licensed code, it shouldn't be a problem. Unless, of course, you want to restrict the users of your code in

Re: [dwm] Documentation!

Hi! I completely disagree with you. First of all, your pen and paper equations are used only one time and that is when you do the equation. Afterwards you throw the paper away and go with the results. When programming, you have to make sure that the code is read- and understandable when

Re: [dwm] Documentation!

Why not simply omit empty lines and comment lines in the loc counting? This would make much sense IMHO. I use sloccount for this. -- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy)

Re: [dwm] Codestyle [was:Documentation!]

heightOfTheHouse / sqrt(frontSideOfTheHouse * leftSideOfTheHouse) :) You laugh... But I have to deal with such code... And worse... -- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy)

Re: [dwm] snapping bugs with multiple screens

2008/5/5, Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I want commented votes (as previously illustrated by example). I want a Porsche and a new x61 tablet. And some Icecream. Also I consider wanting some candy. How about a new flatscreen TV? Yes, I also want a flatscreen TV. --

Re: [dwm] snapping bugs with multiple screens

But anyhow is there a reason why dwm still uses Xinerama instead of XRandR. [1] states that it's deprecated in favor of XRandR. first of all: dwm uses neither Xrandr nor Xinerama, second Xinerama is _NO_ replacement for Xrandr. third actually Xinerama is state for the art for multihead

Re: [dwm] bloq may used to ignore keybindings

This is one of these bug-features. It should be fixed in rdesktop. not in dwm. 2008/4/23, Antoni Grzymala [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Premysl Hruby dixit (2008-04-23, 14:27): Maybe we can also let configurable this bloq. key in config.h and use any other locked key for this. I prefer to

Re: [dwm] I wrote a screen saver/locker and auto-launcher

I prefer sinac. It's simpler and it leaves every unneeded feature out. It was posted on dwm mailinglist a few month ago. using it is very straight forward: sinac -w 10 slock /* * * sinac * * derived from xautolock

[dwm] dwm-gtx

Hi! I would like to announce that I'm working on a dwm fork based on dwm 4.7. It extends dwm with the deck layout which works better on small screens. Also it automaticle moves the pointer to the focused client when desired. Furthermore it optionally supports real Xinerama. Additional

Re: [dwm] dmenu, slock patches; slock DPMS crash

l33tness?! - l33tness sucks. I think sort | uniq is more unixy and therefor better :) 2008/4/10 Antoni Grzymala [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2008-04-10, 11:02): actually 'sort | uniq' is not (much) slower (at least i couldn't measure any difference on my linux setup) Yeah,

Re: [dwm] I like Dmenu a little simpler

this is not be done by dmenu but by dmenu_path. This is a simple shellscript. 2008/3/7, Pieter Verberne [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, Dmenu automatically makes a list of executables which are in my $PATH. I think this is pretty useless. Even CLI apps and apps I never use are in the list. I

Re: [dwm] recent changes

Sorry when I dislike this solution, but it's far to complex. I wished a solution which is simpler and without splitting tile. Let me try to build a different idea. 2008/3/7, pancake [EMAIL PROTECTED]: My impressions about this commit are: *) At the beggining I feel a bit confused until

Re: [dwm] grey blob: export AWT_Toolkit=MTookit fixed everything. jre1.7.0 did not.

It is also in manpage. man dwm 2008/2/27, Ralph E. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Java issue grey blob. For your information: I installed jre1.7.0, from jre-7-ea-bin-b24-linux-i586-04_dec_2007.jar. It fixed one program, HanziHelper, but not another, OpenCards. I set my Java preference

[dwm] new layouts: itile and stack

Hi! Today I hacked two new layouts: itile: This layout looks very similiar to tile in the dwm distribution. It manages the space more efficient when using windows with size hints. stack: Stack is my favorite everyday layout. The algorithm is similiar to itile, but it stacks the windows like

Re: [dwm] dwm on openmoko

I also managed to get dwm run on Motorola a780. Here are my screenshots: http://s01.de/~gottox/files/img/a780.jpg http://s01.de/~gottox/files/img/a780_scrot.png 2008/2/15, Engin Tola [EMAIL PROTECTED]: pancake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have recently adquired an OpenMoko device (neo1973)

Re: [dwm] [PATCH] slock with DPMS.

There is no open session. exec startx 2008/2/11, hiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What do you people do so that others won't just ctrl-alt-backspace back to the open console session? -- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename

[dwm] [PATCH] slock with DPMS.

Hi! I wrote a tiny patch for slock which disables the monitor when slock is running. It's made for saving power. Also it gives an optical feedback when your password is wrong. Please review. regards Gottox -- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm -

Re: [dwm] Nice suckless password manager

I use my brain :) But here is a even simpler method: gpg bla.gpg | grep ^fickenvz: | cut -d: -f 2 2008/1/25, Amit Uttamchandani [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hey guys, I posted a thread on the debian-user mailing list titled Nice GUI/CLI Password Manager for Linux. I got some interesting answers.

Re: [dwm] dietline - minimalistic readline implementation

Very nice idea. What about collecting all these baseutilities and put them on suckless.org? If we can write more utilities we may get a complete suckless userspace... :) 2008/1/23, pancake [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Oops I forgot to say that it supports a dmenu-mode (this code inherits from the old

Re: [dwm] building an autolock with sinac

Hi! Why do you dislike the for-loop? You should only use one function per call. You can select more than one function per call, and even worse, it depends on which order the arguments are given. The common way to parse arguments is to save the switches into variables and afterwards use them to

Re: [dwm] patches for mouse usage

The first patch should be included into mainstream. The last both are nice but not very usefull in my environment :) 2007/12/28, y i y u s [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have patched dwm for my personal usage, here are the patches: dwm-4.8-snaptileds.diff With this patch tiled windows don't become float

Re: [dwm] [announce] sltar-0.2.1

Hi! Why does it suck less? SLOC can't be the only argument, functionality combined with SLOC is an argument. It sucks less because I was searching for a really simple tar implementation. I found none, because everyone of them suck in their own way. Mine simply sucks less in code complexity. :)

Re: [dwm] [ANNOUNCE] cmarkdown-0.3

Thanks! Hi! Actually, there is a test suite available. See http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/2004-December/000909.html It's a good guidline, but Markdown has some syntactic quirks which are difficult to implement in C. Furthermore MarkdownTest is far to strict, imho. I use pre

[dwm] [ANNOUNCE] cmarkdown-0.3

Hi! I wrote an markdown interpreter in C. It should support most of the features markdown.pl has (hopefully). Please report any bugs. It would be a good idea if you could test the interpreter with you're own documents and report any differences to markdown.pl Mercurial: hg clone

[dwm] [ANNOUNCE] cmarkdown-0.1

Hi! Last night I wrote a markdown interpreter in C. It's able to do most task which can be done by markdown.pl but it's much faster than the perl script. cmarkdown does not support Lists now, but it's on my todo for this week. The source is also a little messy, but I plan a little cleanup.

Re: [dwm] [ANNOUNCE] cmarkdown-0.1

Thanks! My english is crap. :) 2007/12/10, Antoni Grzymala [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Enno Gottox Boland dixit (2007-12-10, 13:03): Last night I wrote a markdown interpreter in C. It's able to do most task which can be done by markdown.pl but it's much faster than the perl script. Cool stuff

Re: [dwm] cycling through clients

You never type J or K? ;) that's what capslock is good for :) -- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy)

Re: [dwm] 4.7 is delayed

Hi A minor issue in tip: Sometimes the status bar flickers. 2007/11/4, Antoni Grzymala [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2007-11-04, 12:07): So there will be some time to investigate into the focus steeling issue as well. Cool, it still happens to me with Opera (as described in a

Re: [dwm] Tell that your students...

I really dislike the idea of mind controlled devices. The main problem is: If this main control device is a bidirectional device, what could happen if somebody finds a way to hack your brain. Something like Remote Brainwashing. Very scary. And even when the device has only read access to your

Re: [dwm] input status text bug?

It doesn't work at all... 2007/11/2, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ritesh, I pushed a simplified status text processing version which uses fgets again, for readability and simplicity reasons. Could you please recheck if hg tip fixes your issue? Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe

Re: [dwm] input status text bug?

The reason was something in my .xinitrc. I changed it and everything is fine. 2007/11/2, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 05:21:36PM +0100, Enno Gottox Boland wrote: It doesn't work at all... Sorry, but I can't reproduce. It works correctly for me so far. 2007/11

Re: [dwm] [patch] old-new mouseresize behavior

As far as I can see, there are no such issues, but please review it. 2007/11/1, Sander van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Nov 1, 2007 11:44 AM, Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I wrote a little patch which brings the old resizing behavior. It reduces code complexibility

Re: [dwm] [patch] old-new mouseresize behavior

this is why I use abs()+1. The only possibility where this can be = 0 is an integer overflow. 2007/11/1, Sander van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Nov 1, 2007 12:32 PM, Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As far as I can see, there are no such issues, but please review it. I will when I

[dwm] [PATCH] replacing #define ISTILE by Bool istile

Hi! I created a different behavior of the istile-check. I think a layout should decide itself if it is a tiling or a non-tiling layout. I removed the ISTILE declaration and replaced it by a variable which is set by the layout functions. What do you think about this? -- http://www.gnuffy.org -

Re: [dwm] [PATCH] replacing #define ISTILE by Bool istile

This is also possible. But my intention was that the user does not decide wheather a function is tile or non-tile. It is the choice of the programmer. 2007/10/27, Sander van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 10/27/07, Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I created a different behavior

Re: [dwm] idxoftag

It looks cleaner... But... This heavy usage of defines and macros makes the sourcecode more weird. ntags for example should be renamed to NTAGS to make it more clear that it's a macro. Same at index_to_tag. But nevertheless I dislike this solution. It fucks up the source. 2007/10/22, Stefano

Re: [dwm] idxoftag

The cases `view', `toggleview', `tag' and `toggletag' are discussed in the previous patch. The `setmwfact' case can be handled as +0.05 -- 5 -0.05 -- -5 This would have a big disadvantage. setmwfact interpets 3 different types of input: - +0.XX to increase master width - -0.XX to

Re: [dwm] List of derived/customized/forked dwm versions

Another question: Is xmonad a fork? I don't think so :) 2007/10/19, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 02:19:39PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote: Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/10/19, pancake [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Why not keep this list

Re: [dwm] List of derived/customized/forked dwm versions

2007/10/19, pancake [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Why not keep this list in the suckless wiki? Done. http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/0_general On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:42:15AM +0200, markus schnalke wrote: Is there a list of all the derived/customized dwm versions?

Re: [dwm] List of derived/customized/forked dwm versions

gtx-branch http://s01.de/hg/dwm/ 2007/10/19, pancake [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 08:44:21PM +0200, Alpt wrote: Is there a list of all the derived/customized dwm versions? I am curios to see the modified codes ;) awesome http://awesome.naquadah.org/

Re: [dwm] [discuss] Tiny C Compiler

2007/10/17, T Biehn [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Open Office is JAVA :P Don't talk shit! Open Office is mostly written in C++, it only has Java Bindings.

Re: [dwm] moving the bar from top to bottom

at 10:57:51AM +0200, Enno Gottox Boland wrote: Oh wow! A zero lines patch with a feature which is already included in dwm :) 2007/10/8, Frederic 'jchome' Jaeckel [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hey, I wrote a patch for dwm moving the bar from bottom to top and way round.. maybe its

Re: [dwm] setmwfact bug

No, this is right... (Please don't use C++-style comments in C Code) 2007/10/1, Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: there's a typo in in dwm.c in setmwfact(): ... else if(1 == sscanf(arg, %lf, delta)) { if(arg[0] == '+' || arg[0] == '-') mwfact += delta; else mwfact =

Re: [dwm] A nice flame about C++

What's bad about flamewars? I mean, if someone has to tell his opinion, why not. It's nothing bad about little brawl from time to time. 2007/9/23, James Hoving [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The only way I have ever seen someone end a flamewar is by dropping the subject. Once the game is on the fights

Re: [dwm] Markdown-like filter written in awk

Nice! but I have some trouble using it on my documents: http://s01.de/~gottox/site/navigation.txt http://s01.de/~gottox/site/maninthemiddle.txt (/ul is missing) http://s01.de/~gottox/site/fooder.txt 2007/8/20, y i y u s [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This awk filter was written to replace markdown.pl from

Re: [dwm] feature freeze

But still, if I do a killall .dwm and restart dwm, all windows which were not visible are lost. 2007/8/19, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi there, please check if hg tip works fine. If so I'm going to release it in the evening or tomorrow. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe

Re: [dwm] feature freeze

It works very smoothly now, thanks :) 2007/8/19, Jukka Salmi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Anselm R. Garbe -- dwm (2007-08-19 18:44:59 +0200): Please recheck with hg tip. The problem should be solved now. Actually when dwm is killed, all not-visible windows are iconified, such windows have been

Re: [dwm] Thinking about tags

Also, name-checking seems far more inefficient to me. We're talking about 4 - 10 strcmps per call every strcmp has to compare ~3 characters. I don't think this is inefficient on computer systems nowadays. Furthermore to me it looks cleaner than atoi/sscanf. About regexp: I use no regexp in dwm,

Re: [dwm] 4.3 to windows horizontal tiling

I made a small version for vertical stacking: http://s01.de/~gottox/files/dwm/stack.c http://s01.de/~gottox/files/dwm/stack.h It's only a five minute hack of tile.c which puts the stack under the masterwindow. define: MHFACT - same as MWFACT in tile.c (I use 0.5) functions: see stack.h

Re: [dwm] Fwd: [hackers] separated layout-specific stuff...

Imho, this should be included into 4.4 2007/8/11, Jeremy O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 06:20:02PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 03:11:11PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote: Jeroen Schot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 07:52:46AM

Re: [dwm] floating

I think it's also possible to remove floating layout from dwm and use it as a fallback if arrange == NULL. In my eyes floating does nothing which belongs to a arrange function. The arrange function should only arrange the windows. In my opinion it shouldn't handle things like the visibility of a

Re: [dwm] [OT] which font are you using

Hi I'm using proggyclean for terminals and proggytiny for my windowmanager. 2007/5/26, Julian Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I'm updating my dwm after several weeks (or months) and I see arg is using now a new font, called pixelcarnage. I'm quite comfortable with my terminus choice but I'm

Re: [dwm] environment var tags

Hi! The X protocol does not transmit any environment variables... There is no easy/elegant solution to make this work. 2007/5/18, carmen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It would be cool to be able to store/restore the layout composed by multiple applications, i mean... id like to figure this out,

Re: [dwm] regression with dwm rev. 867

:) I'm not the maintainer... Complain to arg... 2007/5/8, Jukka Salmi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Enno Gottox Boland -- dwm (2007-05-07 21:02:36 +0200): Yes it is. This behavior saves some lines of code. Are you joking? Why not remove the whole tile() function, this would save even more lines of code

Re: [dwm] regression with dwm rev. 867

Yes it is. This behavior saves some lines of code. 2007/5/7, Jukka Salmi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, the most recent change to tile() causes the last client in the current view to be smaller than needed, leaving a small rectangle in the lower right of the screen unused. Is [1]this intended

Re: [dwm] dmenu_cache - patch

This is a patch to dmenu. 2007/4/10, paul liljenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, do i patch dmenu or dwm with this patch. Paul On 4/10/07, Donald Bruce Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dfenze: Hi, I created cache for dmenu_path so finding executables for dmenu is now pretty fast.

Re: [dwm] More suckless software

dmenu doesn't care avout nasty shell aliases... And shell scripts also don't care about shell aliases. They are only respected when you type something in your shell... 2007/4/7, Arun G Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What's wrong with dmenu ? The only thing that annoys me is that it doens't respect my

Re: [dwm] make a window unfocussable?

Hi! dwm doesn't respect WM_HINTS. I discovered this as I played with onscreen keyboards. You could patch dwm to make this work. But I don't see any reason why a simple logwin mustn't get focus. 2007/4/4, Karl. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:44:04AM +1200, Karl. wrote: Is it

Re: [dwm] Reloading running dwm - reload patch

Hi! Why that complex? I only put this line at the end of my ,xinitrc: echo -en y\nn | dmenu -p restart? | grep -xq y exec $0 2007/3/22, Sander van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 3/22/07, Jeff Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/22/07, Sander van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/22/07,

Re: [dwm] no bar

Hi! I think removing the barwin from dwm is a bad idea. A optional barwin is also messy. Barwin is difficult to remove as it is hooked everywhere in the code. You can try to to write a patch, but I think in the main distribution it will stay... Enno Boland 2007/3/19, Kai Hendry [EMAIL

Re: [dwm] st terminal

Hi! This is a very great idea! In this way I can drop nasty screen... Enno Boland 2007/3/15, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:05:44PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: 2kSLOC and I think the final version will be not above 2.5kSLOC, dunno why all those other coders

[dwm] Updated patches from Gottox' Branch

Hi! I released my new patchset on http://81.209.164.44/dwmpatches. Some patches have changed. - browse uses now inctag for both browsing forward and backward (see config.default). - warp strictly sets the mousepointer as long as he is in the Window area. (Maybe i will change it later.) If you

[dwm] Gottox patches for dwm-3.5

Hi! You can find up to date patches of my patchset at http://81.209.164.44 Gottox -- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy)

Re: [dwm] 2wm-0.1

Hi! I tried it, and for some scenarios 2wm will work very fine. But I think for my working environment dwm is better. 2wm is better if you working only at one assignment a time. If you have more than one project a time, you'll get a nice mosaic on your screen, but it's just not usable. I think

  1   2   >