Re: [dwm] nanox

2009-05-20 Thread Jacob Todd
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 09:53:30AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote: 2009/5/20 Jacob Todd jaketodd...@gmail.com: On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:08:07PM +0200, pancake wrote: Seems interesting, but instead of reinventing the wheel, why don't we just clean up X.org and submit patches back

Re: [dwm] nanox

2009-05-19 Thread Jacob Todd
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:08:07PM +0200, pancake wrote: Seems interesting, but instead of reinventing the wheel, why don't we just clean up X.org and submit patches back upstream? Rewriting/implementing X.org seems li ke more work than it's worth, but cleaning up Xorg would be better for

Re: [dwm] musca wm

2009-05-17 Thread Jacob Todd
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:55:27PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote: As to Ubuntu, you can say what you like, but at least for me the maintenance time reduced dramatically after going from Debian to Ubuntu on the 5-6 machines I maintain. And that is something I appreciate, not how small space I can

Re: [dwm] musca wm

2009-05-17 Thread Jacob Todd
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:17:40PM +, Kurt H Maier wrote: On 5/17/09, Jacob Todd jaketodd...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:55:27PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote: As to Ubuntu, you can say what you like, but at least for me the maintenance time reduced dramatically after