On Nov 1, 2007 11:44 AM, Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I wrote a little patch which brings the old resizing behavior. It
reduces code complexibility and doesn't cost a single line of code.
Hi Gottox,
Is this pixel-perfect? If I recall correctly, we removed this way of
As far as I can see, there are no such issues, but please review it.
2007/11/1, Sander van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Nov 1, 2007 11:44 AM, Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I wrote a little patch which brings the old resizing behavior. It
reduces code complexibility and
On Nov 1, 2007 12:58 PM, Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is why I use abs()+1. The only possibility where this can be = 0
is an integer overflow.
Yes, of course, sorry for the noise.
Gr. Sander.
this is why I use abs()+1. The only possibility where this can be = 0
is an integer overflow.
2007/11/1, Sander van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Nov 1, 2007 12:32 PM, Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can see, there are no such issues, but please review it.
I will when I
