On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:48:54PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 12/11/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I don't see anything else, which could have an impact. If
> >manage() is not used, dwm don't manages any window and if in
> >such a situation such Java apps still behave wei
On 12/11/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't see anything else, which could have an impact. If
manage() is not used, dwm don't manages any window and if in
such a situation such Java apps still behave weird, then
this doesn't really looks like a dwm issue after all...
Well, c
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:51:48PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:43:31AM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 06:46:46PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > > On 12/10/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >During sleep I awaked and got
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:43:31AM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 06:46:46PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > On 12/10/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >During sleep I awaked and got another suspect, check if it's
> > >gravitate's fault in just adding a r
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 06:46:46PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 12/10/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >During sleep I awaked and got another suspect, check if it's
> >gravitate's fault in just adding a return; at the very
> >beginning (I believe, that gravitate is totally use
On 12/9/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I'm most interested in is, how do those Java apps behave if
you don't use a WM at all. If they behave same weird, then it's
definately not a dwm fault.
Any X application which is ICCCM-compliant should work even
without a WM at all.
Th
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 08:02:22PM +0100, Anthony Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:30:01PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> >
> > No, I think consider all places which match 'Border' being
> > uncommented (and in manage being set to 0 instead of 1)...
> > But I'm not sure those Java apps r
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:30:01PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
>
> No, I think consider all places which match 'Border' being
> uncommented (and in manage being set to 0 instead of 1)...
> But I'm not sure those Java apps really have problems with
> border=1... Let me know!
>
Hi Anselm,
I fid
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:30:01PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:21:56PM +0100, Anthony Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:52:17AM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > > - Forwarded message from "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> > >
> > > Date: Fr
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:21:56PM +0100, Anthony Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:52:17AM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > - Forwarded message from "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> >
> > Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:51:50 +0100
> > From: "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:52:17AM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> - Forwarded message from "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:51:50 +0100
> From: "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: dwm + java
> U
- Forwarded message from "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:49:04 +0100
From: "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dwm + java
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Hi Sander,
actually you tell me the last non-fixed ann
- Forwarded message from "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:51:50 +0100
From: "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dwm + java
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Another idea which could be related to it? Maybe this J
13 matches
Mail list logo
