Looking into your patch I more and more come to the conclusion
to add an extra void *aux field to Client for extensions like
this (or the previous extensions proposed in the toggle{vert,horiz} patches.
With this in 5.1 you could easily keep your patchset upwards
compatible if you use Client-aux
2008/7/2, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looking into your patch I more and more come to the conclusion
to add an extra void *aux field to Client for extensions like
this (or the previous extensions proposed in the toggle{vert,horiz} patches.
With this in 5.1 you could easily keep your
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:35:38AM +0200, yy wrote:
2008/7/2, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looking into your patch I more and more come to the conclusion
to add an extra void *aux field to Client for extensions like
this (or the previous extensions proposed in the toggle{vert,horiz}
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:30:58AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
Looking into your patch I more and more come to the conclusion
to add an extra void *aux field to Client for extensions like
this (or the previous extensions proposed in the toggle{vert,horiz} patches.
With this in 5.1 you
Another thing:
I don't think that the design of dwm fits well with the
layouting concept of wmii. This is because dwm depends on the
assumption that the layout algorithm in use is dynamic enough to
deal with arbitrary amounts of windows which are singly-linked,
whereas wmii basically has more
2008/7/2, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Another thing:
I don't think that the design of dwm fits well with the
layouting concept of wmii. This is because dwm depends on the
assumption that the layout algorithm in use is dynamic enough to
deal with arbitrary amounts of windows which are
Hello,
Thank you very much for this patch, i'm loving it! It seems to be pretty
stable and feels somewhat like wmii, just without all that 9P
shell-script-and-what-not-config-fuzz.
I hope you won't stop developing dwmii ;-)
With best regards,
Fabio Scotoni
