When only one client is in a workspace (or tagset, or view),
it could be borderless.
In the default geom, or in bottomstack, the border is unnecessary.
In my favorite monocle, any border would remind that something is
below.
_
2008/3/21, Ralph E. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When only one client is in a workspace (or tagset, or view),
it could be borderless.
In the default geom, or in bottomstack, the border is unnecessary.
In my favorite monocle, any border would remind that something is
below.
That's a good
Ralph E. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When only one client is in a workspace (or tagset, or view),
it could be borderless.
In the default geom, or in bottomstack, the border is unnecessary.
In my favorite monocle, any border would remind that something is
below.
No.
The border says:
On 3/21/08, markus schnalke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But anyway, special corner case handling leads to bad code. It
conflicts with generality, which is one of the design principles.
if you look into the code then you will realise that the 'one tiled
client' case is handled specially anyway
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:49:18 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dwm@suckless.org
Subject: Re: [dwm] a lone client could be borderless
On 3/21/08, markus schnalke wrote:
But anyway, special corner case handling leads to bad code. It
conflicts with generality, which is one of the design
vamosaverlas:
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:49:18 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dwm@suckless.org
Subject: Re: [dwm] a lone client could be borderless
On 3/21/08, markus schnalke wrote:
But anyway, special corner case handling leads to bad code. It
conflicts with generality
