On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 07:27:19AM -0800, mikshaw wrote:
--- Richard Pöttler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi,
I am using tcsh and got some problems, when i want
to start a program
with M+p. The problem is, that tcsh assigns
variables with set name
value and not like the sh shells
--- Richard Pöttler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi,
I am using tcsh and got some problems, when i want
to start a program
with M+p. The problem is, that tcsh assigns
variables with set name
value and not like the sh shells with
name=value. I patched
the config.def.h (patch is attached) to
My preference is to not rely on config.h for dmenu
behavior. One solution is to write a script and put
that script in config.h instead. You can make changes
without rebuilding dwm every time.
I make the same thing. I use fish as a shell and it sets the variables
with set as tcsh and has also
actually all FreeBSD based OS's use some variation of csh for a long time now,
whether it's tcsh or plain old csh.
the other BSD's too use other than (ba)sh as their login/interactive shell..
AFAIK OpenBSD and NetBSD use ksh (also a derivative of csh) so...
it's not uncommon in a
On Dec 20, 2007 4:44 PM, Panos P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the other BSD's too use other than (ba)sh as their login/interactive shell..
AFAIK OpenBSD and NetBSD use ksh (also a derivative of csh) so...
I thought ksh is a Bourne shell derivative.
Anyway, use /bin/sh if portability matters.
On Dec 20, 2007 1:55 PM, Sebastian A. Liem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 4:44 PM, Panos P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the other BSD's too use other than (ba)sh as their login/interactive shell..
AFAIK OpenBSD and NetBSD use ksh (also a derivative of csh) so...
I thought ksh is a
hi,
I am using tcsh and got some problems, when i want to start a program
with M+p. The problem is, that tcsh assigns variables with set name
value and not like the sh shells with name=value. I patched
the config.def.h (patch is attached) to directly exec the output of
dmenu and mailed it to
