On 2/12/07, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tonight I couldn't sleep very well and thought about
functionality in dwm which I don't use extensively. But I don't
plan that those ideas will be implemented in dwm, but maybe in a
different tool, being evaluated.
I'm pretty happy with dwm,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:25:54AM +0100, Marek Bernat wrote:
I spend most of my time browsing and using terminals as well and only
occasionaly run other apps.
So this sounds like a very interesting idea and I would definetely love to
try it out.
One thing, I am not sure how you wnat to
On 2/12/07, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reattach will be quite easy - if you detach a window, it will be
made invisible and prepended to the window list. If you now
perform attach, this will seek for the first unvisible window in
the window list, and make it visible. (Invert works
On 12/02/07, Marek Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see. I was wondering if I would be able to
re-attach detached windows easily. e.g. I have ten detached
windows and want to re-attach just one of them, the idea you
suggest isn't very effective, because I
would have to cycle through all of
a little different approach:
i use tags as linux consoles (switching between apps with mod+n)
for me in most cases one win at a time is good enough but somtimes
viewing two win is also needed
so i thought about the folowwing tiling mode:
* on every tag you see one win only but you can cycle
Hi,
The little brother of wmii's little brother? :)
I don't really use the tagging either, I have only three tags I use as
classical workspaces. Therefore I'm quite interested in 2wm. I'm not
sure if removing the statusbar is a good idea: Assuming you always use
'sbar', wouldn't this produce a
On 2/12/07, Tony Lainson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Switch to the other view, detach the one you want, switch back again.
Well, that's what I suggested in the first place. I was just curious whether
arg had thought about some other (and better) approach, that's all.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 01:07:32PM +0100, Marek Bernat wrote:
On 2/12/07, Tony Lainson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Switch to the other view, detach the one you want, switch back again.
Well, that's what I suggested in the first place. I was just curious whether
arg had thought about some
|I also notice that I rarely use the tagging capabilities dwm
|provides, and that I more and more stick to two views only (one with
|web stuff, and another one with terminals). So I developed a
|window organization approach tonight, which I call 'stereo',
|because it consists of two kinds of
I love the idea of stereowm. I keep five tags, but lately I've only
used two, and in a similar manner: there's the web browser, and the
terminal. I generally only have one terminal open, because that's
what screen is for.
My one suggestion? Don't make sbar take up any screen real estate.
Also
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:56:54AM -0600, Kurt H Maier wrote:
I love the idea of stereowm. I keep five tags, but lately I've only
used two, and in a similar manner: there's the web browser, and the
terminal. I generally only have one terminal open, because that's
what screen is for.
Did you
It saddens me to hear that -- I've been using 2wm for a little bit now
and I absolutely love it. I can see for someone with a ton of clients
it would suck, but I tend to just have a browser an a terminal
running. I have screen on always, with a ton of terminals in it, but
it's still just in one
12 matches
Mail list logo
