2008/8/29, Anselm R Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I like simplicity. I like simple applications. But few LOCs don't mean
that
application is simple. It means only that it has few LOCs.
I only argue that few LOCs is a good indicator of simplicty, not the
only one, though.
I see.
To be simple
2008/8/30 Maxim Vuets [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/8/29, yy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just to show you (and all the people who come here asking for
workspaces from time to time) I have attached a config.h with a
workspaces implementation. It hasn't been tested very much, but I
think it works.
Now you
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Maxim Vuets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/29, Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Apache httpd with threads and mod_*.so, PAM... So every
You are using Apache? Shame on you ;). Seriously Apache is definitively
not suckless.
(: propose something
On 8/30/08, Chris Monson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Maxim Vuets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/29, Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You are using Apache? Shame on you ;). Seriously Apache is definitively
not suckless.
(: propose something less
If you are looking for a non-app-server http server, look for 'publicfile'.
2008/8/30 Antoni Grzymala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris Monson dixit (2008-08-30, 13:55):
You are using Apache? Shame on you ;). Seriously Apache is
definitively
not suckless.
(: propose something less sucker,
2008/8/28, Alexander Polakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What you do?
Press Alt-o which brings my IM-client to me. Then press alt-o to hide it
back.
That is not what I meant.
Such title bars bring a possibility to manage windows
w/o keyboard (;
2 paragraphs before you said mouse is not important.
2008/8/29, Donald Chai [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think that mouse is not really important for dwm status bar.
So we can neglect of such feedback.
I can not agree we you that shared libraries and some ABI is so bad.
But agree that it is too heavy for such program as dwm. It is useless
here. On the
2008/8/29, Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you want to seperate dwm and status bar you have to come up with a
practical protocol.
Definitely! (:
Assumed that dwm still manages the tags and
status bar is just responsible for displaying the data, I propose (not
perfect, just to
2008/8/29, yy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You don't need any changes in dwm.c to achieve this functionality. You
just have to define your keys your way. e.g. (not tested) :
...
This way you could chose workspaces with q, w,...
You could also write a little function to set this parameters and call
Maxim Vuets wrote:
2008/8/29, Donald Chai [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think that mouse is not really important for dwm status bar.
So we can neglect of such feedback.
I can not agree we you that shared libraries and some ABI is so bad.
But agree that it is too heavy for such program as dwm. It
2008/8/28 Maxim Vuets [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/8/28, Anselm R Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The reason for the built-in status bar is simplicity. In theory it would be
possible to externalize it, but then you would end up with adding some
kind of command interface to dwm to aim the mouse interaction
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Anselm R Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that mouse is not really important for dwm status bar.
So we can neglect of such feedback.
I use the mouse quite often in dwm, so for me it is. It feels more
natural to me to right click a tag, than performing
Just to show you (and all the people who come here asking for
workspaces from time to time) I have attached a config.h with a
workspaces implementation. It hasn't been tested very much, but I
think it works.
Now you can change workspace with Mod+Tab (and Mod+Shift+Tab) or with
the mouse wheel on
Hi there,
2008/8/27 Maxim Vuets [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So. What I want to know is that why dwm uses built-in status bar,
when even such heavy WM as metacity does not has such one?
The problems I see: dwm somehow needs to pass current tags
status. Not a problem in fact. And not a requirement, is
The most time you spend on developing something.
But from time to time you want to check irc and mail, maybe serf smth.
And all the time you want to see your im client.
What you do?
Press Alt-o which brings my IM-client to me. Then press alt-o to hide it back.
Such title bars bring a possibility
On Aug 28, 2008, at 1:12 PM, Maxim Vuets wrote:
The reason for the built-in status bar is simplicity. In theory it
would be
possible to externalize it, but then you would end up with adding
some
kind of command interface to dwm to aim the mouse interaction from
the bar. In the end
Maxim Vuets wrote:
2008/8/28, Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't propose to get rid of tags, no! I propose to introduce
workspaces in addition to tags. It will be just sets which keep
current layout and selected tags. That's all!
+1
That makes sense to me, but where
2008/8/28 Maxim Vuets [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think that mouse is not really important for dwm status bar.
Well, I think it is. I use dwm exclusively with the mouse without any
changes to dwm.c (have a look at the customisation/customfunctions
section in the wiki to see my config.h)
Why you
2008/8/27 Maxim Vuets [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Next, tags. Really cool idea for sure. But let's be honest: how much
of us use them as tags, not as workspaces? I think not much.
That was the one and only feature that set dwm apart from all other WMs.
Desktops?
You can write a patch, and if enough
Yes, I think it would
be nice if the status
bar could be written as a plugin: whenever
something changed, dwm communicates it
as a message (text)
on stdout.
You can write a patch, and if enough people like it (or Anselm), then
it will make into the main stream
20 matches
Mail list logo
