Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

On 12/8/08, Neale Pickett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I sort of like the idea of using X properties. You could use xprop to one of the most ununixy interfaces man XGetWindowProperty

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

2008/12/9 Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 12/8/08, Neale Pickett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I sort of like the idea of using X properties. You could use xprop to one of the most ununixy interfaces man XGetWindowProperty I agree 100%. The idea of X properties can seem appealing at

[dwm] xprop patch

I very much like this patch. I realized right away that I would never again need to restart dwm when I work on my status script. When it dies, I can just start it up again without restarting DWM. Someone could even have multiple programs running to update the status text. It removes the need

Re: [dwm] xprop patch

On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:41:35AM -0700, Neale Pickett wrote: I very much like this patch. I realized right away that I would never again need to restart dwm when I work on my status script. When it dies, I can just start it up again without restarting DWM. Someone could even have multiple

Re: [dwm] xprop patch

2008/12/9 Benoit T [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:41:35AM -0700, Neale Pickett wrote: I very much like this patch. I realized right away that I would never again need to restart dwm when I work on my status script. When it dies, I can just start it up again without restarting

Re: [dwm] xprop patch

On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:44:21PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote: 2008/12/9 Benoit T [EMAIL PROTECTED]: conversely, when hacking on dwm itself, i like being able to restart dwm without restarting my x session, yet i want the session to exit when dwm exits, ie. dwm xterm in .xsession is not

Re: [dwm] xprop patch

You can do while true do dwm || exit done This way when you kill dwm correctly (with modkey+shift+q as default) it respawns, but if you kill it any other way, the Xsession finishes. You could even add a key binding that does killall dwm or something of the sort for when you want to end the

Re: [dwm] xprop patch

2008/12/9 Neale Pickett [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I very much like this patch. I realized right away that I would never again need to restart dwm when I work on my status script. When it dies, I can just start it up again without restarting DWM. Someone could even have multiple programs running to

Re: [dwm] [slock] slock doesn't like to deactivate after password entry

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Anselm R Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/12/9 Ali Gholami Rudi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 04:00:48PM -0800, Thayer Williams wrote: I've been using slock for about two months now and, as per the subject, slock doesn't release my screen right

Re: [dwm] applyrules()

2008/12/6 yy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Great 5.3.1 release! What about this little change in applyrules? @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ (!r-class || (ch.res_class strstr(ch.res_class, r-class))) (!r-instance || (ch.res_name strstr(ch.res_name, r-instance

Re: [dwm] xprop patch

Or even simpler =) while dwm do sleep 1 done - Jeremy On Tue 09 Dec 2008 - 04:26PM, Evan Gates wrote: You can do while true do dwm || exit done This way when you kill dwm correctly (with modkey+shift+q as default) it respawns, but if you kill it any other way, the Xsession