Hi there,
I'm sorry to announce that we didn't make it this time.
I want to thank all people involved in the preparations for their efforts.
Hopefully, I will have a private chat tomorrow with Leslie to hear
about the reasons and what we can do better the next time.
The GSoC page is moved to
On 3/18/09, Marc Andre Tanner m...@brain-dump.org wrote:
There seems to be an unused variable in the showhide function.
heh
it was introduced for adjustborder, but then it wasn't removed..
http://code.suckless.org/hg/dwm/rev/8b7836a471f8
nice catch
Hi,
I'm in the process of cross-compiling dwm. I understand the idea of
having a config.mk for this, but it is not the easiest.
Since I had to fix some other packets too, I learned myself to setup a
minimal autoconf. This allows one to do:
./configure make make install
Since dwm is distributed
2009/3/19 bill lam cbill@gmail.com:
- die(dwm-VERSION, © 2006-2009 dwm engineers, see LICENSE for
details\n);
Not related to autoconfm but I notice the copyright sign is in utf-8.
If dwm is compiled in other locale, will it display properly when
run on that locale?
No, but
This is a (bad) joke, right?
--
Marc Andre Tanner http://www.brain-dump.org/ GPG key: CF7D56C0
On 3/19/09, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/19 bill lam cbill@gmail.com:
- die(dwm-VERSION, © 2006-2009 dwm engineers, see LICENSE
for details\n);
Not related to autoconfm but I notice the copyright sign is in utf-8.
If dwm is compiled in other locale, will it
hm probably (c) would be better there (and in the license)
utf-8 is great *especially* in the license:)
Hi,
* Kurt Van Dijck kurt.van.di...@eia.be [2009-03-19 17:53]:
I'm in the process of cross-compiling dwm. I understand the idea of
having a config.mk for this, but it is not the easiest.
Since I had to fix some other packets too, I learned myself to setup a
minimal autoconf. This allows one to
On 3/19/09, Nico Golde n...@ngolde.de wrote:
Please read the FAQ: http://suckless.org/common/faq
hm the 9fans link is dead, and neither 9fans[0] nor google[1] has the
entire thread archived
anyway, the main complaints:
- difficult to use by the user: --parameters
- difficult to use by the
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 04:50:31PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
2009/3/19 Kurt Van Dijck kurt.van.di...@eia.be:
I'm in the process of cross-compiling dwm. I understand the idea of
having a config.mk for this, but it is not the easiest.
Since I had to fix some other packets too, I learned
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 06:09:33PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
* Kurt Van Dijck kurt.van.di...@eia.be [2009-03-19 17:53]:
I'm in the process of cross-compiling dwm. I understand the idea of
having a config.mk for this, but it is not the easiest.
Since I had to fix some other packets too,
Discuss this on the autoconf mailinglist, please...
We're all users and thus don't want to waste our time on this stuff from hell.
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
hm probably (c) would be better there (and in the license)
(c) is not legalese, but spelling the whole word copyright and that
c inside circle symbol are.
ianal
--
regards,
GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3
13 matches
Mail list logo
