A compile time option is enough imo.
On 5/11/07, Jeroen Schot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:15:17PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> What do others thing about my proposal?
Hello,
I like this idea. I never liked the current #define TOPBAR true/false,
so this seems to me
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:15:17PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> What do others thing about my proposal?
Hello,
I like this idea. I never liked the current #define TOPBAR true/false,
so this seems to me like a more elegant solution with added NOBAR and
runtime switching as a bonus.
TOP->BOT->
Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a) You want make dwm simplier ...
wasn't the old way to KISS?
customizing should be done by patching source code
right?
yes, a switch like suggested would surely be nice
... but perhaps simple would be better!?
just to think about
Meillo r e
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:15:17PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
|
|What do others thing about my proposal?
b) option is really nice.
ciao
alex
--
Alessandro Dotti Contra | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bologna, Italy | PGP Key ID: 0x9C84C3DA
http://www.hyboria.org/ | jabber: [EMAI
Hi,
I've updated a couple of old patches to the current tip and created some
small convenience patches.
updated to current tip:
moveresize
save_floats
new:
tagall - move all floating windows together to a certain tag
maxmize_vert_horz - maximizes floating windows vertically and
horizontally
You
well I'm interested in both a & b :)
a) I would then simply use dzen to notify any interesting information
( too much cpu / im conversation..)
b) that would be perfect indeed to show/hide the statusbar, so I could
forget a) !
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 15:15 +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> Is b) o
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:15:17PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:59:36PM +0200, lobzang wrote:
> > just a simple question , is it possible to have dwm without any status
> > bar ? (just a blank screen in fact)
>
> It is possible if you hack the code, though it is depe
I really like the b option and it would be very usefull to my setup. I
hope to see this option soon :D
On 5/11/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:59:36PM +0200, lobzang wrote:
> just a simple question , is it possible to have dwm without any status
> bar ?
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:59:36PM +0200, lobzang wrote:
> just a simple question , is it possible to have dwm without any status
> bar ? (just a blank screen in fact)
It is possible if you hack the code, though it is dependent from
your intention, there are two motivations for this:
a) You want
Hi all,
just a simple question , is it possible to have dwm without any status
bar ? (just a blank screen in fact)
Lobzang
___
http://lobzang.free.fr
Hi!
I have a few problems with mplayer, using tip.
How you should be able to reproduce them:
- Resize mplayer (MODKEY+right clic), move the pointer at the top and
right of the top-left corner of its window. It takes the aspect of a
few-pixel-high large rectangle.
- Use BORDERPX=2, put mpl
2007/5/11, Greg B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
thats true but if u do that (its the way i use it atm), the save as window
expands too much covering 1/3 of the whole desktop and eben though u can
make it smaller ,next time it opens again it has the same big size. that
seems to depend on the filename too
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:51:31PM +, David Tweed wrote:
> |Bug 35236 Z\200\223
> |
> |where Z is actually a square shape with p (unsigned char)sel->name[10] gives
> 226.
>
> Just as a quick debugging verification, I added a "scrubber" that replaced
> any bytes not in 0-127
> with spaces whe
13 matches
Mail list logo
