I find quite anoying the maximize command. Because allows you to
hide windows to the user. I don't know if the right solution for this
would be to make maximize act as monocle, or avoid changing the
focus of the maximized client for the current tag, or making the
maximized flag be inheritable for
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:04:24AM +0100, pancake wrote:
I find quite anoying the maximize command. Because allows you to
hide windows to the user. I don't know if the right solution for this
would be to make maximize act as monocle, or avoid changing the
focus of the maximized client for the
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 01:49:27AM +0100, Engin Tola wrote:
comments are welcome.
I've bound next_client and prev_client to Shift-j and Shift-k respectively,
and I think this functionality integrates quite nicely with dwm. It saves a
keystroke zooming in the last client in the stack. :)
I
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:44:03AM +, Felix Leckow wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 01:49:27AM +0100, Engin Tola wrote:
comments are welcome.
I've bound next_client and prev_client to Shift-j and Shift-k respectively,
You never type J or K? ;)
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe
You never type J or K? ;)
that's what capslock is good for :)
--
http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro
http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy)
Hi there,
could you imagine that there is a way that dwm could be used in
a Xinerama environment and how that might look like?
Regardless if that is necessary or not for mainstream dwm,
I see the following possibilities:
- aim multihead setup (distinct bars, tag sets and layouts for
each
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 12:54:00PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
could you imagine that there is a way that dwm could be used in
a Xinerama environment and how that might look like?
Regardless if that is necessary or not for mainstream dwm,
I see the following possibilities:
- aim
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 12:59:21PM +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
A shared tagging setup, but a flag to indicate primary or secondary head.
Sort of like adding an extra dimension to dwm.
That sounds like a simple solution, but still very similiar to
aiming the multihead setup. But how to
On Dec 9, 2007 11:54 AM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could you imagine that there is a way that dwm could be used in
a Xinerama environment and how that might look like?
[A collective groan goes around as people realise I'm still around :-) ]
Yes and
Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both, type(1) and which(1) are not POSIX compliant and might be absent.
Though I'd use which(1) if you don't want to go the way used by
dmenu_path for instance.
Thanks to you and the others who answered.
I will use `which' now.
meillo
They're xterm instances, aren't they.
On Dec 9, 2007 8:28 AM, Engin Tola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
When I open more than 1 client in the tile() layout mode, the total height of
the display is changing with every client I open like this:
+-++
| ||
|
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 02:12:48PM +0100, Engin Tola wrote:
pancake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Recently I buyed a 20 16:10 tft, and i really feel interesting to have
xinerama with dwm. Thinking about that I got the idea that we should just
store two variables:
- selected tag for each
Try this in config.h:
#define RESIZEHINTS False
However, you only delegate the problem to the client app, and
you will get other side-effects from e.g. xterm then.
The behavior you notice is no bug/problem, but dwm provides two
ways two workaround, the default one which leads to some
non-used
Seems like this would call for an alternative layout to be #included,
which allows for the large-resolution screen-spanning desktop, and it
could just emulate multihead by tiling / maximizing windows to those
sections of the desktop which are displayed on each screen. These
boundaries could be
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2007-12-09, 18:27):
[snip]
One idea I was playing in my mind with for a while was assigning some of
the tags to the other display and move between the displays seamlessly
as if moving between the tags - I guess I'll still have the problem of
not being able to move
15 matches
Mail list logo
