On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 07:13:33PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:55:46PM -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:34:49PM -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
> > > Trying out the latest hg, and terminal tagging rules I had set up before
> > > in dwm-4.7 no l
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:55:46PM -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:34:49PM -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
> > Trying out the latest hg, and terminal tagging rules I had set up before
> > in dwm-4.7 no longer work correctly. This is what I have:
> >
> > { MODKEY, X
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:34:49PM -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
> Trying out the latest hg, and terminal tagging rules I had set up before
> in dwm-4.7 no longer work correctly. This is what I have:
>
> { MODKEY, XK_Return, spawn, "exec urxvt" },
> { MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_Return, spawn,
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Ritesh Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:27 PM, y i y u s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > well, I agree that the current Xinerama support is al
Trying out the latest hg, and terminal tagging rules I had set up before
in dwm-4.7 no longer work correctly. This is what I have:
{ MODKEY, XK_Return, spawn, "exec urxvt" },
{ MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_Return, spawn, "exec urxvt -title },
and for my tagging:
const char tags[][MAXTAGLEN] =
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:11:02PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 04:44:34PM +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:51:30PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> > > * Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080304 17:21]:
> > > > question 1: should no
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:11:02PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 04:44:34PM +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:51:30PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> > > * Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080304 17:21]:
> > > > question 1: should no
Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> monocle will be in mainstream dwm tonight.
Wee, yeah!
*SCNR*
meillo
* Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080304 18:50]:
> > > question 2: is there a chance for real tabbing support (this
> > > would seem more important than xinerama support to me)? or
> > > at least a workspace (tag) specfic decision whether tiling
> > > _or_ tabbing is used for arranging
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 04:44:34PM +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:51:30PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> > * Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080304 17:21]:
> > > question 1: should not the focused window be always brought
> > > to the foreground irrespecti
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:51:30PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> * Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080304 17:21]:
> > question 1: should not the focused window be always brought
> > to the foreground irrespective of whether it is currently
> > maximized or not? it's even more irra
* Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080304 17:21]:
> question 1: should not the focused window be always brought
> to the foreground irrespective of whether it is currently
> maximized or not? it's even more irrating when you already
> have a few maximized windows and then open another
dear list,
consider the following scenario:
1. open at least two windows, e.g. xterms, in a previously
empty view. these appear in the standard tiling layout of
`dwm'.
2. maximize ('full screen') the window which currently has
the focus (main window or the other one).
3. set focus (mod1-
Ritesh Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I too like the idea of abstracting the Xinerama code away from the main dwm
> codebase.
Good decition in my eyes!
meillo
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Ritesh Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:27 PM, y i y u s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > > well, I agree that the current Xinerama support is also not the
> > > way to go. First of all it is far to complex in the code for
> > >
15 matches
Mail list logo