Re: [dwm] Tagging rules regression in hg tip?

2008-03-04 Thread Jeremy O'Brien
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 07:13:33PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:55:46PM -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:34:49PM -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote: > > > Trying out the latest hg, and terminal tagging rules I had set up before > > > in dwm-4.7 no l

Re: [dwm] Tagging rules regression in hg tip?

2008-03-04 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:55:46PM -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:34:49PM -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote: > > Trying out the latest hg, and terminal tagging rules I had set up before > > in dwm-4.7 no longer work correctly. This is what I have: > > > > { MODKEY, X

Re: [dwm] Tagging rules regression in hg tip?

2008-03-04 Thread Jeremy O'Brien
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:34:49PM -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote: > Trying out the latest hg, and terminal tagging rules I had set up before > in dwm-4.7 no longer work correctly. This is what I have: > > { MODKEY, XK_Return, spawn, "exec urxvt" }, > { MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_Return, spawn,

Re: [dwm] Xinerama: back to the roots

2008-03-04 Thread Ritesh Kumar
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Ritesh Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:27 PM, y i y u s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > well, I agree that the current Xinerama support is al

[dwm] Tagging rules regression in hg tip?

2008-03-04 Thread Jeremy O'Brien
Trying out the latest hg, and terminal tagging rules I had set up before in dwm-4.7 no longer work correctly. This is what I have: { MODKEY, XK_Return, spawn, "exec urxvt" }, { MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_Return, spawn, "exec urxvt -title }, and for my tagging: const char tags[][MAXTAGLEN] =

Re: [dwm] visibility of focused windows

2008-03-04 Thread Jeremy O'Brien
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:11:02PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 04:44:34PM +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:51:30PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote: > > > * Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080304 17:21]: > > > > question 1: should no

Re: [dwm] visibility of focused windows

2008-03-04 Thread Jeremy O'Brien
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:11:02PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 04:44:34PM +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:51:30PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote: > > > * Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080304 17:21]: > > > > question 1: should no

Re: [dwm] visibility of focused windows

2008-03-04 Thread markus schnalke
Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > monocle will be in mainstream dwm tonight. Wee, yeah! *SCNR* meillo

Re: [dwm] visibility of focused windows

2008-03-04 Thread Alexander Polakov
* Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080304 18:50]: > > > question 2: is there a chance for real tabbing support (this > > > would seem more important than xinerama support to me)? or > > > at least a workspace (tag) specfic decision whether tiling > > > _or_ tabbing is used for arranging

Re: [dwm] visibility of focused windows

2008-03-04 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 04:44:34PM +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:51:30PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote: > > * Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080304 17:21]: > > > question 1: should not the focused window be always brought > > > to the foreground irrespecti

Re: [dwm] visibility of focused windows

2008-03-04 Thread Joerg van den Hoff
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:51:30PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote: > * Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080304 17:21]: > > question 1: should not the focused window be always brought > > to the foreground irrespective of whether it is currently > > maximized or not? it's even more irra

Re: [dwm] visibility of focused windows

2008-03-04 Thread Alexander Polakov
* Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080304 17:21]: > question 1: should not the focused window be always brought > to the foreground irrespective of whether it is currently > maximized or not? it's even more irrating when you already > have a few maximized windows and then open another

[dwm] visibility of focused windows

2008-03-04 Thread Joerg van den Hoff
dear list, consider the following scenario: 1. open at least two windows, e.g. xterms, in a previously empty view. these appear in the standard tiling layout of `dwm'. 2. maximize ('full screen') the window which currently has the focus (main window or the other one). 3. set focus (mod1-

Re: [dwm] Xinerama: back to the roots

2008-03-04 Thread markus schnalke
Ritesh Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I too like the idea of abstracting the Xinerama code away from the main dwm > codebase. Good decition in my eyes! meillo

Re: [dwm] Xinerama: back to the roots

2008-03-04 Thread Tuncer Ayaz
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Ritesh Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:27 PM, y i y u s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > well, I agree that the current Xinerama support is also not the > > > way to go. First of all it is far to complex in the code for > > >