Re: [dwm] Freedom (was: Re: sic ipv6 patch)

2008-05-25 Thread Matthias Kirschner
Hello Archie, * Archie Elberling [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-24 23:02:09 +0100]: Second this change would make the license incompatible with the GPL (which should be obviated even if you do not agree with the GPL). If you do not agree with something, then what is the point in making effort

Re: [dwm] Freedom (was: Re: sic ipv6 patch)

2008-05-25 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Matthias Kirschner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As already said, please read http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/gpl-compatible.html for the answer. Resorting to argumentum ad internetum, eh? That link is crap. The whole argument is license your code GPL-compatible

[dwm] domax (again)

2008-05-25 Thread yy
domax is much better this way, using XMoveResizeWindow. I have removed ban/unban and merged it into arrange and added my tagkeys macro, so at the end it removes 25 lines to the dwm source. Some questions: 1. wouldn't it be a good idea moving the tagset definition to config.h? So everybody can

Re: [dwm] domax (again)

2008-05-25 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
Hi yiyus, this patch looks interesting. I will let you know tomorrow my thoughts. Kind regards, Anselm On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 05:48:05PM +0200, yy wrote: domax is much better this way, using XMoveResizeWindow. I have removed ban/unban and merged it into arrange and added my tagkeys

Re: [dwm] very experimental xinerama patch

2008-05-25 Thread Hugo Tavares Reis
Hi. Now this patch is fully functional, I'm using it on my main devel machine, but it need some improvements. br, -h On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Hugo Tavares Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi all. After a few hours testing things and learning how dwm works, I've a pseudo-functional