Re: [dwm] savefloats isn't working in 5.1

2008-08-07 Thread RCarter
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > RCarter wrote: > > This page: http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/save_floates.html > > says about the save_floats patch: "Recently it became part of the main > > distribution of dwm" > > > > I'm just switching

Re: [dwm] savefloats isn't working in 5.1

2008-08-07 Thread Matthias-Christian Ott
RCarter wrote: > This page: http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/save_floates.html > says about the save_floats patch: "Recently it became part of the main > distribution of dwm" > > I'm just switching to 5.1, and have never used this functionality before. > I don't think its working. I hope

[dwm] Suggested enhancement to pertag

2008-08-07 Thread RCarter
5.1's mod-space toggling behavior is much better than it was several version ago. Thank you. Pertag should remember this toggling information for each (not sure what word to use) "workspace". So, it would remember two layouts per tag, instead of one.

[dwm] savefloats isn't working in 5.1

2008-08-07 Thread RCarter
This page: http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/save_floates.html says about the save_floats patch: "Recently it became part of the main distribution of dwm" I'm just switching to 5.1, and have never used this functionality before. I don't think its working.

Re: [dwm] What am I doing wrong with displaying utf-8 string?

2008-08-07 Thread Christian Garbs
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 12:19:26AM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > Antoni Grzymala dixit (2008-08-06, 23:28): > Actually, then don't work for me. dmenu shows these Asian characters > correctly but fails on simple Polish strings, strangely enough. Hmm, same here. This does not work for me: $ echo

Re: [dwm] Being not so elitist

2008-08-07 Thread Tube
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 09:48:04AM +0200, markus schnalke wrote: > > "This keeps its userbase small and elitist. No novices asking stupid > questions." > > The reason is, that I met people who thought, that the dwm-/suckless- > community is arrogant. good :) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ht

Re: [dwm] rationale for resizehints=False?

2008-08-07 Thread Sander van Dijk
On 8/7/08, Donald Chai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Aug 7, 2008, at 12:35 AM, Sander van Dijk wrote: >> I'm not sure what you mean by "having the inside border setup to >> follow resizehints, but the outside border does not follow >> resizehints"? Handling resizehints doesn't have an effect on

Re: [dwm] rationale for resizehints=False?

2008-08-07 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 8/7/08, Donald Chai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have "tile" set the height of A *precisely* to wh (A->h = wh). > Resize hints are used for the width (A->w = A->basew + n*A->incw for > some n such that |A->w - mfact*ww| < A->incw). For B and C, the width > is set precisely (B->w = ww - A->w),

Re: [dwm] Re: Digest of dwm (6370-6419)

2008-08-07 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Станислав dixit (2008-08-07, 12:35): > Hello! > How can I unsubscribe from this maillist? Really, Stanislav, we don't need the whole digest quoted to actually help you with that question. http://www.suckless.org/common/community.html -- [a] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [dwm] rationale for resizehints=False?

2008-08-07 Thread Donald Chai
On Aug 7, 2008, at 12:35 AM, Sander van Dijk wrote: On 8/6/08, Donald Chai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have the inside border set up to follow resize hints (this packs more text onscreen if my display's number of rows is not a multiple of 3). The outside border does not follow resize hints, b

Re: [dwm] rationale for resizehints=False?

2008-08-07 Thread Sander van Dijk
On 8/6/08, Donald Chai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have the inside border > set up to follow resize hints (this packs more text onscreen if my > display's number of rows is not a multiple of 3). The outside border > does not follow resize hints, because I have them set up to be > rendered exactl