Re: [dwm] is wmii dead?

On (17/08/08 14:48), rundstutzen wrote: > To: dwm@suckless.org > From: rundstutzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [dwm] is wmii dead? > User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) > Reply-To: dwm mail list > List-Id: dwm mail list > > Hi folks, > > the question arised in another email here.

[dwm] is wmii dead?

Hi folks, the question arised in another email here. the repository tells me the last commit is 2 month old. is there any ongoing development? i don't want to hassle people, i am satisfied with wmii the way it is, i am just curious. regards

Re: [dwm] dvtm suggestion

What about the ability to run different dvtm instances on different virtual terminals that share a common "session"? This could be seen as the tag/workspace concept. You could detach a window on /dev/tty1 and reattach it in your other dvtm on /dev/tty3. The only thing that comes to my mind is t

[dwm] dvtm suggestion

Hi there, I'm starting to use dvtm an a 17" TFT on a virtual console rather than on my tiny b/w serial terminal. It's even better than before :-) I've just had this idea, which I don't really need but perhaps it's an idea to toy around with: What about the ability to run different dvtm instance