[dwm] dvtm suggestion
Hi there, I'm starting to use dvtm an a 17 TFT on a virtual console rather than on my tiny b/w serial terminal. It's even better than before :-) I've just had this idea, which I don't really need but perhaps it's an idea to toy around with: What about the ability to run different dvtm instances on different virtual terminals that share a common session? This could be seen as the tag/workspace concept. You could detach a window on /dev/tty1 and reattach it in your other dvtm on /dev/tty3. The only thing that comes to my mind is that in order to get six workspaces you'd have to log in manually six times on different consoles. Or perhaps there is a getty out there that supports multi-logins... Regards, Christian -- Christian.Garbs.http://www.cgarbs.de Wolfgang Allinger in de.etc.fahrzeug.auto: ***Vergleich Golf TDI / Porsche Boxster*** Verbrauch Porsche Boxter: 0,0ltr Diesel auf 100km Verbrauch VW Golf TDI:6,5ltr Diesel auf 100km signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [dwm] dvtm suggestion
What about the ability to run different dvtm instances on different virtual terminals that share a common session? This could be seen as the tag/workspace concept. You could detach a window on /dev/tty1 and reattach it in your other dvtm on /dev/tty3. The only thing that comes to my mind is that in order to get six workspaces you'd have to log in manually six times on different consoles. Or perhaps there is a getty out there that supports multi-logins... Are you simply looking for a tag/workspace mechanism, or do you want the ability to detach and reattach sessions? - tags/workspaces are a straightforward addition to dvtm, since it was derived from dwm. (I have it mostly working for myself, but I had to rip out a lot of dvtm-specific things like 'minimize') - GNU Screen does detach/reattach.
[dwm] is wmii dead?
Hi folks, the question arised in another email here. the repository tells me the last commit is 2 month old. is there any ongoing development? i don't want to hassle people, i am satisfied with wmii the way it is, i am just curious. regards
Re: [dwm] is wmii dead?
On (17/08/08 14:48), rundstutzen wrote: To: dwm@suckless.org From: rundstutzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [dwm] is wmii dead? User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org Hi folks, the question arised in another email here. the repository tells me the last commit is 2 month old. is there any ongoing development? i don't want to hassle people, i am satisfied with wmii the way it is, i am just curious. regards Hi well, wouldn't be better to ask this question on wmii mail-list? :) -Ph -- Premysl Anydot Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/
