Re: [dwm] Re: font problem
Try using xfontsel to see if there is a problem with the terminus package. Also let us know what your actual LC_* vars look like, e.g. ; env | grep LC Kind regards, Anselm 2008/9/21 Max Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 02:06:06AM +0200, Marcin Cieslak wrote: Max Fischer wrote: hi, i've lately some problems with using the terminus font. dwm responses missing font: ISO8859-1. terminus font is working in terminals etc. and many other fonts are working with dwm, too. I don't get what's wrong, my locale seems ok to me http://pastie.org/276377 That does not explain anything. What is your font specification in the config.h? Mine is (for example): static const char font[] = -*-terminus-medium-r-normal-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-*; (this is wrapped, it's one line). Make sure that there are no unwanted spaces in the specification. --m I've tried several specifications, at least -*-terminus-medium-r-normal-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-*-*. Your spec. did it neither. -- --Anselm
Re: [dwm] Re: font problem
Ahh, sry guys. I just checked my xorg.conf and noticed /usr/share/fonts/local/ wasn't specified as fontpath (me so dumb) :D so nevermind and thx anyway! On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:37:39AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote: Try using xfontsel to see if there is a problem with the terminus package. Also let us know what your actual LC_* vars look like, e.g. ; env | grep LC Kind regards, Anselm 2008/9/21 Max Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 02:06:06AM +0200, Marcin Cieslak wrote: Max Fischer wrote: hi, i've lately some problems with using the terminus font. dwm responses missing font: ISO8859-1. terminus font is working in terminals etc. and many other fonts are working with dwm, too. I don't get what's wrong, my locale seems ok to me http://pastie.org/276377 That does not explain anything. What is your font specification in the config.h? Mine is (for example): static const char font[] = -*-terminus-medium-r-normal-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-*; (this is wrapped, it's one line). Make sure that there are no unwanted spaces in the specification. --m I've tried several specifications, at least -*-terminus-medium-r-normal-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-*-*. Your spec. did it neither. -- --Anselm
[dwm] Web mail archives
I'm not happy with the archives of dwm: http://lists.suckless.org/dwm/0809/index.html An old program http://www.hypermail-project.org/ (51k SLOC) is used and I don't think it manages threads as well as mutt. Compare mutt's output: 2904 N 14/09 Johannes Wegener ( 0) [dwm] XCB? 2905 N 14/09 Anselm R Garbe( 0) |- 2906 N 14/09 Tobias Ulmer ( 0) | `- 2907 N 14/09 Don Stewart ( 0) | |- 2908 N 14/09 Kai Großjohann( 0) | | `- 2909 N 14/09 Anselm R Garbe( 0) | `- 2910 N 14/09 Donald Chai ( 0) `- 2911 N 14/09 Anselm R Garbe( 0) `- With hypermail's: # [dwm] XCB? Johannes Wegener (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 10:02:34 UTC) * Re: [dwm] XCB? Anselm R Garbe (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 11:32:25 UTC) o Re: [dwm] XCB? Tobias Ulmer (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 17:23:34 UTC) + Re: [dwm] XCB? Don Stewart (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 19:00:34 UTC) + Re: [dwm] XCB? Kai Großjohann (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 20:49:53 UTC) + Re: [dwm] XCB? Anselm R Garbe (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 20:02:02 UTC) * Re: [dwm] XCB? Donald Chai (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 15:28:24 UTC) o Re: [dwm] XCB? Anselm R Garbe (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 20:12:46 UTC) Besides looking ugly, Kai's reply isn't properly indented at the third(?) level. I was wondering if anyone more competent than I has looked through mutt's threading source or at least thought about writing a better Web mail archival tool. Or perhaps a better tool exists for putting mail boxes on the Web? I think in the case of the suckless community, you can perhaps assume message id references will not get b0rked, so the implementation could be simpler. nn,
