Re: [dwm] patch to not reparent children to init

"Anselm R Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I remember there was a problem with the SIGCHLD signal handler, > I need to recheck with Stevens tomorrow. It might be that this was on > some ancient UNIX though. But the double-fork is definately the most > portable solution. Page 267 in Stev

Re: [dwm] patch to not reparent children to init

Hi Neale, 2008/11/6 Neale Pickett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "Donald Chai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Neale Pickett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Reparenting everything to init with the double-fork is a nightmare on a >>> many-user machine, especially when I'm logg

[dwm] nokia on android LOCs

/I was just reading some news and got shocked by this sentence: USA/ - According to Niklas Savander, executive vice president of services and software at Nokia, Google Android isn't yet ready for Nokia to make an assessment on. "A platform has three to four million lines of code"

Re: [dwm] patch to not reparent children to init

On (06/11/08 09:53), Neale Pickett wrote: > To: dwm mail list > From: Neale Pickett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [dwm] patch to not reparent children to init > User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) > Reply-To: dwm mail list > List-Id: dwm mail list > > "Donald Ch

Re: [dwm] patch to not reparent children to init

"Donald Chai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Neale Pickett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Reparenting everything to init with the double-fork is a nightmare on a >> many-user machine, especially when I'm logged in more than once. pstree >> becomes useless. This sets