[2009-02-03 22:33] Marcin Cieslak sa...@system.pl
I don't like this approach. I have always preferred software that fails
fast. As soon as something is wrong - just abort with debugging information
what went wrong.
I see some issues with the approach described in the paper. It assumes that
crash only... even the name sucks.
2009/2/4, markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de:
[2009-02-03 22:33] Marcin Cieslak sa...@system.pl
I don't like this approach. I have always preferred software that fails
fast. As soon as something is wrong - just abort with debugging
information
what
