[dwm] [PATCH] small fix in propertynotify
looks like a typo. diff -r cf81cf8ab206 dwm.c --- a/dwm.c Sun Feb 08 12:11:35 2009 + +++ b/dwm.c Thu Feb 12 17:13:40 2009 +0100 @@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ Window trans; XPropertyEvent *ev = e-xproperty; - if((ev-window == root) (ev-atom = XA_WM_NAME)) + if((ev-window == root) (ev-atom == XA_WM_NAME)) updatestatus(); else if(ev-state == PropertyDelete) return; /* ignore */ -- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy)
Re: [dwm] [PATCH] small fix in propertynotify
On (12/02/09 17:16), Enno Gottox Boland wrote: To: dwm mail list d...@lists.suckless.org From: Enno Gottox Boland got...@gmail.com Subject: [dwm] [PATCH] small fix in propertynotify Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org looks like a typo. Yes, it was. Now it's gone thanks to you. -Ph -- Premysl Anydot Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/
Re: [dwm] [PATCH] small fix in propertynotify
Hi, - if((ev-window == root) (ev-atom = XA_WM_NAME)) + if((ev-window == root) (ev-atom == XA_WM_NAME)) Why not remove the inner parens as well? Without them, gcc would have noticed. Regards, Peter
Re: [dwm] nmaster strikes back
Yes I use it on all my comptuers! Especially on my 2650x1600.
=P
On Feb 11, 2009, at 9:59 AM, Jimmy Tang jt...@tchpc.tcd.ie wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:57:02AM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
this way master width cannot be set to a fixed value
i'd probably use a macro in the config:
.. {.v = REL(-10)},
.. {.v = ABS{2}},
is nmaster that useful?
for me it is useful, i would imagine it would be really useful to
people
with big high res displays (1920x1200 an larger panels) using smallish
font sizes.
jimmy
--
Jimmy Tang
Trinity Centre for High Performance Computing,
Lloyd Building, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
http://www.tchpc.tcd.ie/ | http://www.tchpc.tcd.ie/~jtang
Re: [dwm] solaris regression tests
Hi all, After some digging within Solaris PATH Settings, I managed to compile dwm-5.4.1 without problems: (So did others hopefully, but I want to collect nearly all plattforms) ,echo $PATH /usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin:/usr/ucb:/usr/dist/exe:/usr/sfw:/usr/sfw/bin ,CC=/usr/sfw/bin/gcc ,gmake dwm build options: CFLAGS = -std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -Os -I. -I/usr/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -DVERSION=5.4.1 LDFLAGS = -s -L/usr/lib -lc -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 CC = /usr/sfw/bin/gcc CC dwm.c CC -o dwm ,uname -a SunOS srm-hello-08 5.10 Generic_127111-07 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200 ,file dwm dwm:ELF 32-bit MSB executable SPARC Version 1, dynamically linked, stripped I got the idea of nightly regression tests for dwm (think Tinderbox). This could then be extended to match several patches against several Versions. regards Stefan -- Jetzt 1 Monat kostenlos! GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL für nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a
